IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p1818-d326360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Agglomeration Characteristics of Rural Settlements in Poor Mountainous Areas of Southwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Guanglian Luo

    (College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
    College of Tourism and Land resources, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China)

  • Bin Wang

    (Chongqing Zhiheng Land Planning and Design co., LTD, Chongqing 400067, China)

  • Dongqi Luo

    (Research Center of the Economy of the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River of the Key Research Base of Humanities, Ministry of Education, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China)

  • Chaofu Wei

    (College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)

Abstract

The rural settlements in poverty-stricken mountainous areas are the "living fossils" of an economic society with the characteristics of spatial dispersion and are slowly changing. Spatial agglomeration is the development direction of rural settlements. In-depth exploration of the spatial agglomeration characteristics and influencing factors of rural settlements in poverty-stricken mountainous areas is a way to provide a basis for rural settlement restructuring. We selected Pengshui County, a national poverty-stricken county in the southwestern mountainous area of China, as the research area. Spatial buffer and kernel density analysis were used to analyze the agglomeration characteristics of rural settlements and influencing factors. The results show that: (1) The rural settlements are small in scale and the space is evenly dispersed. 55.63% of the rural settlements’ sizes are less than 1000 m 2 , 84.15% of the rural settlements’ sizes are less than 2500 m 2 , and 92.81% of the rural settlements are within 200 m. (2) The elevation and slope of topographic factors have a significant agglomeration effect on rural settlements. However, the slope direction has no agglomeration effect. 85.41% of rural settlements (52.75% of rural settlements are gathered between 400 and 800 m above sea level) are gathered at an altitude of 1000 m or less, and 77.59% of rural settlements are gathered with a slope of 6~25°. Additionally, there are few rural settlements with a slope of 0~2°. Moreover, the distribution of residential areas has no agglomeration effect on rural settlements. (3) The cultivated land exerts the most significant effect on rural settlements followed by roads and water sources, while the role of urban land is weak. 99.48% of rural settlements are concentrated in the 100 m area of cultivated land. Therefore, in the poverty-stricken mountainous areas in the southwestern mountainous areas of China, convenient farming is the primary condition for production and living. Rural settlements are highly correlated with cultivated land. Rural settlements are scattered and concentrated with the scattered cultivated land. The rural settlements were leaded by the distribution of cultivated land. Less high-quality cultivated land with less slope were occupied or not by rural residential areas’ people.

Suggested Citation

  • Guanglian Luo & Bin Wang & Dongqi Luo & Chaofu Wei, 2020. "Spatial Agglomeration Characteristics of Rural Settlements in Poor Mountainous Areas of Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1818-:d:326360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1818/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1818/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xuedong Li & Yunhui Liu & Yajuan Chen & Pengyao Li & Zhenrong Yu, 2019. "Village Regrouping in the Eastern Plains of China: A Perspective on Home-Field Distance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Jie Wang & Weiwei Zhang & Zengxiang Zhang, 2018. "Quantifying the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Rural Settlements and the Associated Impacts on Land Use in an Undeveloped Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Yi Peng & Xuewen Li & Li Huang & Shuli Jiang & Yelin Xu & Yani Lai, 2018. "Risks of Developing Concentrated Rural Settlement after the Wenchuan Earthquake in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiajun He & Xin Fan & Lin Chen & Haoruo Chen & Jin Luo & Zirui Huang, 2023. "Influencing Factors of the Post-Relocation Support Policy’s Satisfaction Degree for Rural Household: A Case Study of County M, Sichuan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Yanbo Qu & Xiaozhen Dong & Lingyun Zhan & Weiya Zhu & Sen Wang & Zongli Ping & Bailin Zhang, 2022. "Achieving rural revitalization in China: A suitable framework to understand the coordination of material and social space quality of rural residential areas in the plain," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1052-1081, September.
    3. Sen Chen & Muhammad Sajid Mehmood & Shuchen Liu & Yimin Gao, 2022. "Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Rural Settlements in Qinba Mountains, Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Guiwen Liu & Cheng Li & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuhan Zheng & Hongjuan Wu & Jian Tang, 2022. "Determining the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Urban Regeneration Projects in China on the City Scale: The Case of Shenzhen," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    5. Jingyu Liu & Qiong Song & Xiaomin Wang, 2023. "Spatial Morphology Evolution of Rural Settlements in the Lower Yellow River Plain: The Case of Menggang Town in Changyuan City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Zongfeng Chen & Xueqi Liu & Zhi Lu & Yurui Li, 2021. "The Expansion Mechanism of Rural Residential Land and Implications for Sustainable Regional Development: Evidence from the Baota District in China’s Loess Plateau," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Rong Ran & Lei Hua & Tingrou Li & Yejing Chen & Junfu Xiao, 2023. "Why Have China’s Poverty Eradication Policy Resulted in the Decline of Arable Land in Poverty-Stricken Areas?," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Lishan Xiao & Peiqi Shi & Tong Lin & Ning Chen & Sha Huang, 2021. "Rural Morphology and Forces Driving Change in Rapidly Urbanizing Areas: A Case Study in Fujian, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-15, April.
    9. He Zhang & Yutong Wang & Yu Qi & Siwei Chen & Zhengkai Zhang, 2024. "Assessment of Yellow River Region Cultural Heritage Value and Corridor Construction across Urban Scales: A Case Study in Shaanxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Guanglian Luo & Bin Wang & Bin Li & Ruiwei Li & Dongqi Luo, 2022. "Quantitative Analysis of Spatial–Temporal Differentiation of Rural Settlements Extinction in Mountainous Areas Based on Reclamation Projects: A Case Study of Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Geng, Bo & Tian, Yugang & Zhang, Lihao & Chen, Bo, 2023. "Evolution and its driving forces of rural settlements along the roadsides in the northeast of Jianghan Plain, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    12. Feiyang Lin & Xuan Zhang & Zhiyao Ma & Yifu Zhang, 2022. "Spatial Structure and Corridor Construction of Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of the Ming Great Wall," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Zehong Li & Xinran Miao & Mengyuan Wang & Shuguang Jiang & Yuxian Wang, 2022. "The Classification and Regulation of Mountain Villages in the Context of Rural Revitalization—The Example of Zhaotong, Yunnan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Jian Xu & Liangjun Zheng & Ruiqu Ma & Han Tian, 2023. "Correlation between Distribution of Rural Settlements and Topography in Plateau-Mountain Area: A Study of Yunnan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    15. Shangqian Li & Yutian Liang & Xin Deng & Weipan Xu & Xun Li, 2023. "Exploring the Spatial Heterogeneity of Rural Development in Laos Based on Rural Building Spatial Database," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bo Liu & Desheng Xue & Yiming Tan, 2019. "Deciphering the Manufacturing Production Space in Global City-Regions of Developing Countries—a Case of Pearl River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Chunliu Gao & Li Cheng & Javed Iqbal & Deqiang Cheng, 2019. "An Integrated Rural Development Mode Based on a Tourism-Oriented Approach: Exploring the Beautiful Village Project in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Haorui Wu, 2021. "When Housing and Communities Were Delivered: A Case Study of Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Rural Reconstruction and Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Yanbo Qu & Xiaozhen Dong & Lingyun Zhan & Weiya Zhu & Sen Wang & Zongli Ping & Bailin Zhang, 2022. "Achieving rural revitalization in China: A suitable framework to understand the coordination of material and social space quality of rural residential areas in the plain," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1052-1081, September.
    5. Zongfeng Chen & Xueqi Liu & Zhi Lu & Yurui Li, 2021. "The Expansion Mechanism of Rural Residential Land and Implications for Sustainable Regional Development: Evidence from the Baota District in China’s Loess Plateau," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Su, Kangchuan & Hu, Baoqing & Shi, Kaifang & Zhang, Zhongxun & Yang, Qingyuan, 2019. "The structural and functional evolution of rural homesteads in mountainous areas: A case study of Sujiaying village in Yunnan province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Shixiong Yan & Yuannan Long & Huaiguang He & Xiaofeng Wen & Qian Lv & Moruo Zheng, 2023. "Flood response to urban expansion in the Lushui River Basin," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(1), pages 779-805, January.
    8. Zhichao Li & Xihan Tan, 2018. "Revitalization of Trust in Local Government after Wenchuan Earthquake: Constraints and Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Huanhuan Li & Wei Song, 2019. "Expansion of Rural Settlements on High-Quality Arable Land in Tongzhou District in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Jieyong Wang & Xiaoyang Wang & Guoming Du & Haonan Zhang, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Changes of Rural Settlements and Their Influencing Factors in Northeast China from 2000 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Fayazi, Mahmood & Yeh, Emily T. & Li, Fan, 2019. "Development and divergent post-disaster trajectories in a mountain village: Temporal dynamics of differentiation after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Lei He & Ziang Xie & Yi Peng & Yan Song & Shenzhi Dai, 2019. "How Can Post-Disaster Recovery Plans Be Improved Based on Historical Learning? A Comparison of Wenchuan Earthquake and Lushan Earthquake Recovery Plans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Binglu Wu & Di Mu & Yi Luo & Zhengguang Xiao & Jilong Zhao & Dongxu Cui, 2022. "Rural Ecological Problems in China from 2013 to 2022: A Review of Research Hotspots, Geographical Distribution, and Countermeasures," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1818-:d:326360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.