IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1478-d906303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Structure and Corridor Construction of Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of the Ming Great Wall

Author

Listed:
  • Feiyang Lin

    (School of International Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Xuan Zhang

    (School of Marxism, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China)

  • Zhiyao Ma

    (School of International Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
    Key Laboratory of Department of Culture and Tourism of Information Technology of Architectural Heritage Inheritance, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Yifu Zhang

    (School of International Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

Abstract

Exploring the spatial structure of intangible cultural heritage (ICH) and constructing heritage corridors are conducive to the adaptive reuse of heritage and the improvement of the surviving environment, which is of great significance to the living inheritance of ICH. Guided by the concept of the heritage corridor, this study took the ICH along the Ming Great Wall as the research object. Kernel density estimation and a standard deviation ellipse analysis were used to explore the spatial structure and then combined with a suitability analysis of heritage corridors to further explore the spatial locations of corridors. A multifactor spatial superposition was carried out with the minimal cumulative resistance (MCR) method. The resistance factors, including land use type, elevation, slope, road system, river system, and the heritage corridors, were constructed. The results show that: (1) ICH along the Ming Great Wall forms a spatial pattern of “three cores and one belt”. The high-density core areas exist in Beijing and Liaoning, and the secondary core areas exist in northern Ningxia and southwestern Inner Mongolia. This results from the joint action of the natural, economic, and social environment. (2) On the whole, all kinds of ICH are distributed from southwest to northeast, among which folk art is particularly obvious. (3) The distribution trend of suitability is “high in the east and low in the west”. The high-suitability areas are mainly concentrated in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Liaoning regions, while the low-suitability areas are concentrated in Gansu, Ningxia, and northern Inner Mongolia. Finally, this study discusses the appropriate development mode of the heritage corridors of the Ming Great Wall from the macrolevel to the mesolevel.

Suggested Citation

  • Feiyang Lin & Xuan Zhang & Zhiyao Ma & Yifu Zhang, 2022. "Spatial Structure and Corridor Construction of Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of the Ming Great Wall," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1478-:d:906303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    2. Yang, Chih-Hai & Lin, Hui-Lin & Han, Chia-Chun, 2010. "Analysis of international tourist arrivals in China: The role of World Heritage Sites," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 827-837.
    3. Hongru Wang & Jun He & Noshaba Aziz & Yue Wang, 2022. "Spatial Distribution and Driving Forces of the Vegetable Industry in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Macharis, Cathy & Springael, Johan & De Brucker, Klaas & Verbeke, Alain, 2004. "PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 307-317, March.
    5. Guanglian Luo & Bin Wang & Dongqi Luo & Chaofu Wei, 2020. "Spatial Agglomeration Characteristics of Rural Settlements in Poor Mountainous Areas of Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Chuanchuan Yuan & Li Gan & Huili Zhuo, 2022. "Coupling Mechanisms and Development Patterns of Revitalizing Intangible Cultural Heritage by Integrating Cultural Tourism: The Case of Hunan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianxin Zhang & Yuliang Yang & Xin Fan & Shengya Ou, 2023. "Corridors Construction and Development Strategies for Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Study about the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Yu Chen & Jingwen Zhao & Xinyi Zhao & Zeyi Wang & Zhe Xu & Shilin Li & Weishang Liu, 2025. "Study on the Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Intangible Cultural Heritage Along the Great Wall of Hebei Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Haisheng Hu, 2025. "Spatial Synergy Between Cultural Heritage and Metro Networks: A Case Study of Distribution Patterns and Value Assessment in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Run Wang & Jiahui Lou & Shengqin Huang & Jiarui Xiao & Fei Long, 2025. "Balancing Safety and Growth: An Ecological Resilience Framework for Great Wall Tourism Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Liwen Jiang & Jun Cai & Yilun Fan, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Distribution and Heritage Corridor Construction of Vernacular Architectural Heritage in the Cao’e River, Jiaojiang River, and Oujiang River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Bowen Yang & Xinmiao Yang & Huang Xiao, 2025. "Public interest litigation protection policy of commemorative architectural cultural heritage: a case study from China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Jingyi Xiong & Chunshan Ke & Mingjing Xie & Kaida Chen & Xiaodong Wang, 2025. "A Study on the Defensive Characteristics and Sustainable Conservation Strategies of Ming Dynasty Coastal Defence Settlements in Fujian," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-29, September.
    8. Xin Liu & Tangxia Wu & Ziyi Xie & Weijing Yuan & Huan Yang, 2025. "Creating the Spatial Utilization Pattern of Traditional Villages in the Yellow River by Connecting the Heritage Corridors System with the Assessment of Tourism Potential," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, July.
    9. Runmo Liu & Dan Meng & Ming Wang & Huili Gong & Xiaojuan Li, 2025. "Analysis of Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Mechanisms of Cultural Heritage Distribution Along the Jiangnan Canal, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-25, May.
    10. Weicheng Han & Zele Mo & Wei Wang & Yicheng Zhou, 2025. "Research on Vegetation Removal Strategies for the Ming Guangwu Great Wall Based on Clearance Resistance Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Fanlei Meng & Xinyi Xiao, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Distribution and Adaptive Reuse Results Assessment of Beijing Industrial Heritage Based on the Sustainable Renewal Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Chunlan Du & Di Pan & Qingying Liu, 2025. "The Construction of a Protection Network for Traditional Settlements Across Regions: A Case Study of the Chengdu–Chongqing Ancient Post Road Heritage Corridor in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-24, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Mohsin & Hengbin Yin & Weilun Huang & Shijun Zhang & Luyao Zhang & Ana Mehak, 2022. "Evaluation of Occupational Health Risk Management and Performance in China: A Case Study of Gas Station Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Bianrong Chang & Xinjun Ding & Jianchao Xi & Ruiying Zhang & Xianhong Lv, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Distribution Pattern and Tourism Utilization Potential of Intangible Cultural Heritage Resources in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Qinghua Mao & Guihan Dong & Yang Xiao & Hao Wu & Yaqing Gao & Jiacheng Fan, 2025. "Risk Assessment of Microalgae Carbon Sequestration Projects Under Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Tiziana Cuccia, 2012. "Is it worth being inscribed in the world heritage list? A case study of �The Baroque cities in Val di Noto� (Sicily)," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 66(2), pages 169-190.
    5. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    6. Honghong Wei & Mingming Cheng & Li Huang, 2024. "5A accreditation of tourist attractions in China and international tourist arrivals: A system generalised method of moments approach," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(4), pages 627-645, December.
    7. Sindhwani, Rahul & Pereira, Vijay & Sampat, Brinda & Shankar, Amit & Nigam, Achint & Salwan, Prashant, 2025. "Exploring barriers to social robot adoption: A mixed-method study in the Indian retail sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    8. Ouyang, Yao & Pedrycz, Witold, 2016. "A new model for intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attributes decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 677-682.
    9. Lupo, Toni, 2015. "Fuzzy ServPerf model combined with ELECTRE III to comparatively evaluate service quality of international airports in Sicily," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 249-259.
    10. Min Gon Chung & Tao Pan & Xintong Zou & Jianguo Liu, 2018. "Complex Interrelationships between Ecosystem Services Supply and Tourism Demand: General Framework and Evidence from the Origin of Three Asian Rivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Ruben Loon & Tom Gosens & Jan Rouwendal, 2014. "Cultural heritage and the attractiveness of cities: evidence from recreation trips," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 38(3), pages 253-285, August.
    12. Jian Xu & Liangjun Zheng & Ruiqu Ma & Han Tian, 2023. "Correlation between Distribution of Rural Settlements and Topography in Plateau-Mountain Area: A Study of Yunnan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Albadvi, Amir & Chaharsooghi, S. Kamal & Esfahanipour, Akbar, 2007. "Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 673-683, March.
    14. Wang, Xiaojun & Chan, Hing Kai & Li, Dong, 2015. "A case study of an integrated fuzzy methodology for green product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 212-223.
    15. Can, Ali Selcuk & Ekinci, Yuksel & Pino, Giovanni, 2021. "Joint brand advertising for emerging heritage sites," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Hsu, C.-H. & Wang, Fu-Kwun & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2012. "The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 95-111.
    17. Wang, Ying-Ming & Luo, Ying & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 735-747, April.
    18. Rui Guo & Zhenyong Wu, 2023. "Social sustainable supply chain performance assessment using hybrid fuzzy-AHP–DEMATEL–VIKOR: a case study in manufacturing enterprises," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12273-12301, November.
    19. Tsita, Katerina G. & Pilavachi, Petros A., 2012. "Evaluation of alternative fuels for the Greek road transport sector using the analytic hierarchy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 677-686.
    20. Faiza Hamdi & Ahmed Ghorbel & Faouzi Masmoudi & Lionel Dupont, 2018. "Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 763-788, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1478-:d:906303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.