IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i6p1268-d1677804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Pattern and Driving Mechanisms of Settlements in the Agro-Pastoral Ecotone of Northern China: A Case Study of Eastern Inner Mongolia

Author

Listed:
  • Ziqi Zhang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xiaotong Wu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Song Chen

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Lyuyuan Jia

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Qianhui Wang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhiqing Zhang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Mingzhe Li

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Ruofei Jia

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Qing Lin

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Rural settlements in agro-pastoral ecotones reflect the complex interplay between natural constraints and human land use, particularly in ecologically sensitive and climatically transitional regions. This study investigated the agro-pastoral ecotone of eastern Inner Mongolia, a representative region characterized by environmental heterogeneity and competing land use functions. Landscape pattern indices, ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, and geographically weighted regression (GWR) were employed to analyze settlement morphology and its environmental determinants. The results reveal a distinct east–west spatial gradient: settlements are larger and more concentrated in low-elevation plains with favorable hydrothermal conditions, whereas those in mountainous and pastoral areas are smaller, sparser, and more fragmented. OLS regression revealed a strong positive correlation between arable land and settlement density ( r > 0.8), whereas elevation and slope were significantly negatively correlated. GWR results further highlight spatial non-stationarity in the influence of key environmental factors. Average annual temperature generally shows a positive influence on settlement density, particularly in the central and eastern agricultural areas. In contrast, forest cover is predominantly negative, especially in the Greater Khingan Mountains. Proximity to water resources consistently enhances settlement density, although the magnitude of this effect varies across regions. Based on spatial characteristics and land use structure, rural settlements were categorized into four types: alpine pastoral, agro-pastoral transitional, river valley agricultural, and forest ecological. This study provides empirical evidence that natural factors (topography, climate, and hydrology) and land use variables (farmland, pasture, and woodland) collectively shape rural settlement patterns in transitional landscapes. The findings offer methodological and practical insights for targeted land management and sustainable rural development in agro-pastoral regions under ecological and socioeconomic pressures.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziqi Zhang & Xiaotong Wu & Song Chen & Lyuyuan Jia & Qianhui Wang & Zhiqing Zhang & Mingzhe Li & Ruofei Jia & Qing Lin, 2025. "Spatial Pattern and Driving Mechanisms of Settlements in the Agro-Pastoral Ecotone of Northern China: A Case Study of Eastern Inner Mongolia," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1268-:d:1677804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1268-:d:1677804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.