IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9658-d881355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government Subsidy Policy and Online Selling Strategy in a Platform Supply Chain with Green R&D and DDM Activities

Author

Listed:
  • Zongyu Mu

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Qiujie Li

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Gengxin Dai

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Ke Li

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Guangming Zhang

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Fan Zhang

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

Abstract

Many governments actively subsidize the green activities of manufacturers and consumers to effectively realize the achievement of carbon emissions peak and carbon-neutral goals, while the development of a platform economy can effectively contribute to sustainable development. Therefore, we have modeled a platform supply chain using game theory, in which the manufacturer conducts green research and development (R&D) activities, the third-party platform conducts data-driven marketing (DDM) activities to promote green products, and all consumers have green preferences. The numerical example and empirical analysis methods are used to mine management insights. The government subsidizes the manufacturer’s green R&D, the third-party platform’s DDM, and the consumers’ green consumption. The third-party platform provides an agency selling or reselling strategy to sell products. Our results show that: (1) the sensitivity coefficient of consumers to green R&D and DDM activities has positive impacts on all members’ profits and on the green R&D level of products in the platform supply chain, with three kinds of government subsidy policies. (2) The levels of the three kinds of government subsidies mainly have an impact on all members’ profits and on the green R&D level of products in the platform supply chain with an agency selling or reselling strategy; government subsidies to the manufacturer are more conducive to improving the green R&D level of products. (3) The levels of the three government subsidies and the unit service commissioning fee for selling products are the main factors affecting the preferred selling strategy of each member and the equilibrium of the selling strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Zongyu Mu & Qiujie Li & Gengxin Dai & Ke Li & Guangming Zhang & Fan Zhang, 2022. "Government Subsidy Policy and Online Selling Strategy in a Platform Supply Chain with Green R&D and DDM Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9658-:d:881355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9658/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9658/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Wenge & He, Yuanjie, 2017. "Green product design in supply chains under competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 165-180.
    2. Zhang, Linghong & Wang, Jingguo & You, Jianxin, 2015. "Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 63-73.
    3. Maxime C. Cohen, 2018. "Big Data and Service Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(9), pages 1709-1723, September.
    4. Cristian Huse & Claudio Lucinda, 2014. "The Market Impact and the Cost of Environmental Policy: Evidence from the Swedish Green Car Rebate," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 124(578), pages 393-419, August.
    5. Jiayi Joey Yu & Christopher S. Tang & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2018. "Improving Consumer Welfare and Manufacturer Profit via Government Subsidy Programs: Subsidizing Consumers or Manufacturers?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 752-766, October.
    6. Jung, Seung Hwan & Feng, Tianjun, 2020. "Government subsidies for green technology development under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 726-739.
    7. Kathy Baylis & Don Fullerton & Daniel H. Karney, 2013. "Leakage, Welfare, and Cost-Effectiveness of Carbon Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(3), pages 332-337, May.
    8. Xianjun Geng & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Lai Wei, 2018. "How Add†on Pricing Interacts with Distribution Contracts," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(4), pages 605-623, April.
    9. Hong, Zhaofu & Guo, Xiaolong, 2019. "Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 155-166.
    10. Vibhanshu Abhishek & Kinshuk Jerath & Z. John Zhang, 2016. "Agency Selling or Reselling? Channel Structures in Electronic Retailing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(8), pages 2259-2280, August.
    11. Agi, Maher A.N. & Yan, Xinghao, 2020. "Greening products in a supply chain under market segmentation and different channel power structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    12. Abhijeet Ghoshal & Subodha Kumar & Vijay Mookerjee, 2020. "Dilemma of Data Sharing Alliance: When Do Competing Personalizing and Non‐Personalizing Firms Share Data," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(8), pages 1918-1936, August.
    13. Jian Xue & Ruifeng Gong & Laijun Zhao & Xiaoqing Ji & Yan Xu, 2019. "A Green Supply-Chain Decision Model for Energy-Saving Products That Accounts for Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Xu, Xiaoping & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Supply chain operations with online platforms under the cap-and-trade regulation: Impacts of using blockchain technology," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Chen, Jen-Yi & Dimitrov, Stanko & Pun, Hubert, 2019. "The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains’ sustainability innovation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 42-58.
    16. Maher Agi & Xinghao Yan, 2020. "Greening products in a supply chain under market segmentation and different channel power structures," Post-Print hal-02898158, HAL.
    17. Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2015. "Marketplace or Reseller?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 184-203, January.
    18. Bian, Junsong & Zhang, Guoqing & Zhou, Guanghui, 2020. "Manufacturer vs. Consumer Subsidy with Green Technology Investment and Environmental Concern," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 832-843.
    19. Shao, Lulu & Yang, Jun & Zhang, Min, 2017. "Subsidy scheme or price discount scheme? Mass adoption of electric vehicles under different market structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1181-1195.
    20. Li, Xiang, 2020. "Reducing channel costs by investing in smart supply chain technologies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    21. Yu-Shan Chen, 2008. "The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image – Green Core Competence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(3), pages 531-543, September.
    22. David F. Drake, 2018. "Carbon Tariffs: Effects in Settings with Technology Choice and Foreign Production Cost Advantage," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 667-686, October.
    23. Gongbing Bi & Minyue Jin & Liuyi Ling & Feng Yang, 2017. "Environmental subsidy and the choice of green technology in the presence of green consumers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 255(1), pages 547-568, August.
    24. Shan Chen & Xu Wang & Lin Ni & Yingbo Wu, 2017. "Pricing Policies in Green Supply Chains with Vertical and Horizontal Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, December.
    25. Zhang, Zhichao & Xu, Haiyan & Ke, Ginger Y. & Chen, Kebing, 2022. "Selecting online distribution modes for differentiated products in a platform supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    26. Yu, Yugang & Han, Xiaoya & Hu, Guiping, 2016. "Optimal production for manufacturers considering consumer environmental awareness and green subsidies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 397-408.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ke Li & Gengxin Dai & Yanfei Xia & Zongyu Mu & Guitao Zhang & Yangyan Shi, 2022. "Green Technology Investment with Data-Driven Marketing and Government Subsidy in a Platform Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Jiguang Wang & Jianhong Chang & Yucai Wu, 2020. "The Optimal Production Decision of Competing Supply Chains When Considering Green Degree: A Game-Theoretic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Kelei Xue & Guohua Sun & Yuyan Wang & Shuiye Niu, 2021. "Optimal Pricing and Green Product Design Strategies in a Sustainable Supply Chain Considering Government Subsidy and Different Channel Power Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Yanfei Xia & Quan Guo & Hao Sun & Ke Li & Zongyu Mu, 2022. "Green R&D Financing Strategy in Platform Supply Chain with Data-Driven Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Zheng, Shiyuan & Jiang, Changmin & Fu, Xiaowen & Ge, Ying-En & Shu, Jia, 2022. "Subsidies for green technology adoption under uncertain demand and incomplete information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. Qinghua Feng & Tong Liu, 2022. "Selection Strategy and Coordination of Green Product R&D in Sustainable Competitive Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Juan Zhang & Ziyue Wang & Huiju Zhao, 2020. "The Impact of Consumer Subsidy on Green Technology Innovations for Vehicles and Environmental Impact," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Huang, Shuai & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Wang, Ningning, 2020. "Green subsidy modes and pricing strategy in a capital-constrained supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Junjian Wu & Jennifer Shang, 2021. "Optimal Green Operation and Information Leakage Decisions under Government Subsidy and Supply Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Liu, Samuel Shuai & Hua, Guowei & Ma, Benedict Jun & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Competition between green and non-green products in the blockchain era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    11. Zhang, Zhichao & Xu, Haiyan & Zhao, Yingxue & Liu, Zhi & Chen, Kebing, 2023. "Extended warranty service provision: A strategic analysis for the E-commerce platform supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    12. Han, Xiaoya & Khouja, Moutaz & Liu, Xin, 2023. "A dynamic model considering consumer green awareness and environmental subsidy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    13. Lai, Zhixuan & Lou, Gaoxiang & Ma, Haicheng & Chung, Sai-Ho & Wen, Xin & Fan, Tijun, 2022. "Optimal green supply chain financing strategy: Internal collaborative financing and external investments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    14. Suyuan Luo & Tsan‐Ming Choi, 2022. "E‐commerce supply chains with considerations of cyber‐security: Should governments play a role?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 2107-2126, May.
    15. Yumin Fu & Jianyun Wu & Cheng Ma & Xiaoyu Fu, 2023. "Agency, Reselling, or Hybrid: Strategic Channel Selection in a Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Xia, Jing & Niu, Wenju, 2021. "Carbon-reducing contract design for a supply chain with environmental responsibility under asymmetric information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    17. Zhao, Meng & Li, Bin & Ren, Jiali & Hao, Zhihua, 2023. "Competition equilibrium of ride-sourcing platforms and optimal government subsidies considering customers’ green preference under peak carbon dioxide emissions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    18. Cheng, Fei & Chen, Tong & Chen, Qiao, 2022. "Cost-reducing strategy or emission-reducing strategy? The choice of low-carbon decisions under price threshold subsidy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Zangiabadi, Maryam & Hafezi, Maryam, 2023. "How much is enough? Government subsidies in supporting green product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1316-1333.
    20. Zhou, Yu & Yan, Shuangqi & Li, Gendao & Xiong, Yu & Lin, Zhibin, 2023. "The impact of consumer skepticism on blockchain-enabled sustainability disclosure in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9658-:d:881355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.