IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p8005-d852767.html

Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Network Resilience in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: A Structural Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jialu Shi

    (School of Economics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China
    College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Xuan Wang

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Chengxin Wang

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Haimeng Liu

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yi Miao

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Fuyi Ci

    (School of Economics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

Abstract

Currently, urban crises are spreading, even tending to be magnified along the urban networks. Improving urban network resilience can effectively reduce the loss and cope with sudden disasters. Based on the dimensions of regional resilience and the framework of urban network, a new evaluation system of network resilience, including economic, social, and engineering networks, was established to assess the network resilience of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) from a structural perspective. We analyzed the spatial characteristics and influencing factors of network resilience using social network analysis and quadratic assignment procedure. The results were as follows: (1) regional difference was biggest in GBA’s economic network strength while smallest in its transportation network strength, and the east bank of the Pearl River represented an extremely resilient connection axis; (2) the structures of network resilience and its subsystems were heterogeneous, and the connection paths of network resilience were more heterogeneous and diversified than those of the subsystems; (3) network resilience presented an obvious core–edge structure, and the spatial correlation and spillover effect between blocks were substantial; and (4) geographical proximity, as well as differences in economic development, urban agglomeration, and market development, had a significant impact on network resilience. This study provides a more systematic approach to evaluate the regional network resilience, and the results provide references for the construction of bay areas in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Jialu Shi & Xuan Wang & Chengxin Wang & Haimeng Liu & Yi Miao & Fuyi Ci, 2022. "Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Network Resilience in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: A Structural Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8005-:d:852767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8005/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8005/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minmin Li & Wenhua Guo & Renzhong Guo & Biao He & Zhichao Li & Xiaoming Li & Wenchao Liu & Yong Fan, 2022. "Urban Network Spatial Connection and Structure in China Based on Railway Passenger Flow Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Wenjia Zhang & Jean-Claude Thill, 2019. "Mesoscale Structures in World City Networks," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(3), pages 887-908, May.
    3. Ruiying Li & Qiang Dong & Chong Jin & Rui Kang, 2017. "A New Resilience Measure for Supply Chain Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Yi Cheng & Haimeng Liu & Shaobin Wang & Xuegang Cui & Qirui Li, 2021. "Global Action on SDGs: Policy Review and Outlook in a Post-Pandemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Kyujin Jung, 2017. "Sources of Organizational Resilience for Sustainable Communities: An Institutional Collective Action Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaqing Hu & Haitao Ma, 2025. "Understanding the resilience of intercity innovation networks," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Yu, Yu & Ma, Daipeng & Qian, Yingmiao, 2023. "A resilience measure for the international nickel trade network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    3. Zhao, Na & Zhang, Yan & Chen, Xinyan & Xiao, Junjie & Lu, Yuwen & Zhai, Wei & Zhai, Guofang, 2025. "Resilience measurement and enhancement of population mobility network in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration under extreme rainfall impact," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    4. Sun, Xiaoqian & Zheng, Changhong & Chen, Xinyue & Wandelt, Sebastian, 2024. "Multiple airport regions: A review of concepts, insights and challenges," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trucco, Paolo & Petrenj, Boris, 2023. "Characterisation of resilience metrics in full-scale applications to interdependent infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Xing, Kexin & Yuan, Yuan, 2025. "Will Sino–U.S. trade friction affect the resilience of the global backbone industry network?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 893-908.
    3. Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez & Stephanie Rodriguez-Besteiro & Juan José Cabello-Eras & Alvaro Bustamante-Sanchez & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & Macarena Donoso-Gonzalez & Ana Isabel Beltrán-Velasco & J, 2022. "Sustainable Development Goals in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Moslem Alimohammadlou & Zahra Khoshsepehr, 2025. "Green-resilient supplier selection: a hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 22107-22143, September.
    5. Pawlicka Kinga & Bal Monika, 2022. "Sustainable Supply Chain Finances implementation model and Artificial Intelligence for innovative omnichannel logistics," Management, Sciendo, vol. 26(1), pages 19-35, January.
    6. Zhaoming Yang & Qi Xiang & Yuxuan He & Shiliang Peng & Michael Havbro Faber & Enrico Zio & Lili Zuo & Huai Su & Jinjun Zhang, 2023. "Resilience of Natural Gas Pipeline System: A Review and Outlook," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Lei Du & Yingbin Feng & Li Yaning Tang & Wei Kang & Wei Lu, 2020. "Networks in disaster emergency management: a systematic review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1-27, August.
    8. Lorenzo Bruno Prataviera & Alessandro Creazza & Marco Melacini & Fabrizio Dallari, 2022. "Heading for Tomorrow: Resilience Strategies for Post-COVID-19 Grocery Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Maureen S. Golan & Laura H. Jernegan & Igor Linkov, 2020. "Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 222-243, June.
    10. Daniel Kangogo & Domenico Dentoni & Jos Bijman, 2020. "Determinants of Farm Resilience to Climate Change: The Role of Farmer Entrepreneurship and Value Chain Collaborations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    11. Ziming Gao, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Shadow of Technology: Robotics Development and Regional Economic Inequality," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 2249-2282, March.
    12. Ben Derudder, 2021. "Network Analysis of ‘Urban Systems’: Potential, Challenges, and Pitfalls," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(4), pages 404-420, September.
    13. Alhidaifi, Saleh Mohammed & Asghar, Muhammad Rizwan & Ansari, Imran Shafique, 2026. "Cyber resilience quantification: A probabilistic estimation model for IT infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PB).
    14. Julie L. Nagoshi & Vijayan K. Pillai & Mashooq A. Salehin, 2025. "Evolving Roles for International Social Work in Addressing Climate Change," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, January.
    15. Mark Elder & Elli Newman, 2023. "Monitoring G20 Countries’ SDG Implementation Policies and Budgets Reported in Their Voluntary National Reviews (VNRs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-27, November.
    16. Haimeng Liu & Liwei Wang & Jinzhou Wang & Hangtian Ming & Xuankuang Wu & Gang Xu & Shengwu Zhang, 2024. "Multidimensional spatial inequality in China and its relationship with economic growth," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Minsun Song, 2018. "Does having a strong commitment matter in building sustainable networks?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 551-564, March.
    18. Wu, Yue & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2026. "Strategic investment in supply chain resilience: A study of fast-moving consumer goods under demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    19. Olivera Kostoska & Sonja Mitikj & Petar Jovanovski & Ljupco Kocarev, 2020. "Core-periphery structure in sectoral international trade networks: A new approach to an old theory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, April.
    20. Vasile Dragu & Floriana Cristina Oprea & Eugenia Alina Roman, 2025. "Assessment of Bucharest Metro Expansion and Its Correlation with the Territorial System," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8005-:d:852767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.