IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i9d10.1007_s10668-022-02454-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green-resilient supplier selection: a hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model

Author

Listed:
  • Moslem Alimohammadlou

    (Shiraz University)

  • Zahra Khoshsepehr

    (Shiraz University)

Abstract

The supply chain (SC) represents a network of activities that seeks to deliver products to consumers all around the world. Globalization has led to fluctuations and disruptions in the SC. Presently, alarming disruptions are caused by increasing amounts of industrial waste, greenhouse gasses, and other types of wastage that have engendered environmental pollution. To reduce these disruptions and control environmental impacts, the notion of the green-resilient (G-resilient) SC can prove to be particularly helpful. One of the most important processes of the G-resilient SC is supplier selection. The purpose of this study was to identify the criteria for evaluating G-resilient suppliers. To accomplish its objectives, the study proposed two hypotheses: (a) G-resilient supplier selection could bring about acceptable results and (b) the proposed hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model could help to validly select G-resilient suppliers. To test the above hypotheses, the criteria were primarily extracted through reviewing the literature. The hesitant fuzzy best–worst method was used to determine the weights of the criteria, while the hesitant fuzzy evaluation based on distance from average solution method was employed to rank the G-resilient suppliers. Then, sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the hypotheses. The results revealed that, to evaluate G-resilient suppliers, four dimensions must be considered: production, green quality, organizational aspects, and resilience. Considering these four dimensions would provide a more comprehensive insight into evaluating G-resilient suppliers. Results of the ranking also clarified that the suppliers were similarly ranked through different hesitant fuzzy methods. As such, the two hypotheses were confirmed. Findings also demonstrated that “technology” was the most important indicator in evaluating G-resilient suppliers. Using new technologies, organizations cannot only select best suppliers by having full access to their information, but also they can register smart orders, which would help to desist from wasting resources, improve organizational performance, and reduce environmental pollution. This study suggested practical implications that could guide decision-makers in organizations on how to implement G-resilient factors in their supplier selection process, especially when they faced hesitations in supplier evaluation. The novelty of the study were the construction of a G-resilient supplier evaluation model and the application of hesitant fuzzy methods in analyzing the data.

Suggested Citation

  • Moslem Alimohammadlou & Zahra Khoshsepehr, 2025. "Green-resilient supplier selection: a hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 22107-22143, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02454-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02454-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02454-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02454-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02454-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.