IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p4791-d542789.html

Impacts of Composition and Canopy Characteristics of Plant Communities on Microclimate and Airborne Particles in Beijing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Shuxin Fan

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    Laboratory of Beijing Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Beijing 100083, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Mengyuan Zhang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    Laboratory of Beijing Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Beijing 100083, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yilun Li

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    Laboratory of Beijing Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Beijing 100083, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Kun Li

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    Laboratory of Beijing Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Beijing 100083, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Li Dong

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    Laboratory of Beijing Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Beijing 100083, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

As the basic component of urban green-spaces, plant communities regulate both the microclimate and air particle levels. Understanding the regulatory mechanism of plant communities represents the theoretical basis for using green spaces to improve the urban climate and mitigate air particle pollution. Based on field investigations, differences in the daily air temperatures (AT), relative humidity (RH), and PM 10 and PM 2.5 concentrations in eight compositional types of plant communities were quantitatively analyzed. In addition, the correlations between these variables and various canopy parameters were further established in order to detect critical thresholds. The results showed that, among the eight compositional types, significant differences existed in daily AT, RH, PM 10 and PM 2.5 levels. The mixed tree, shrub and grass (M-TSG) community had the strongest cooling and PM 10 reduction effects; the broad-leafed tree, shrub and grass (B-TSG) community had the best humidifying effect; while the mixed tree and grass (M-TG) community most effectively reduced PM 2.5 concentrations. The daily AT and PM 10 concentrations were significantly negatively correlated with canopy density (CD) and leaf area index (LAI), but positively correlated with canopy porosity (CP) and sky view factor (SVF), while these correlations were opposite for daily RH. The response of daily PM 2.5 concentrations to canopy characteristics was complex, featuring multiple non-linear relations. Critical thresholds were found in some cases. Overall, M-TSG or M-TG communities with about 75% CD, 55% CP, 2.5 LAI and 0.18 SVF perform most noticeable both microclimate and air particle regulation services.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuxin Fan & Mengyuan Zhang & Yilun Li & Kun Li & Li Dong, 2021. "Impacts of Composition and Canopy Characteristics of Plant Communities on Microclimate and Airborne Particles in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4791-:d:542789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4791/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4791/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marando, Federica & Salvatori, Elisabetta & Sebastiani, Alessandro & Fusaro, Lina & Manes, Fausto, 2019. "Regulating Ecosystem Services and Green Infrastructure: assessment of Urban Heat Island effect mitigation in the municipality of Rome, Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 92-102.
    2. Xuan Zhao & Jianjun Liu & Yuankun Bu, 2021. "Quantitative Analysis of Spatial Heterogeneity and Driving Forces of the Thermal Environment in Urban Built-up Areas: A Case Study in Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Filoteo Gomez-Martinez & Kirsten M. de Beurs & Jennifer Koch & Jeffrey Widener, 2021. "Multi-Temporal Land Surface Temperature and Vegetation Greenness in Urban Green Spaces of Puebla, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-25, February.
    4. Yu Song & Xiaodong Song & Guofan Shao, 2020. "Effects of Green Space Patterns on Urban Thermal Environment at Multiple Spatial–Temporal Scales," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rui Wang & Qi Chen & Dexiang Wang, 2022. "Effects of Altitude, Plant Communities, and Canopies on the Thermal Comfort, Negative Air Ions, and Airborne Particles of Mountain Forests in Summer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunyu Chen & Linglan Bi & Kuanfan Zhu, 2021. "Study on Spatial-Temporal Change of Urban Green Space in Yangtze River Economic Belt and Its Driving Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Susca, T. & Zanghirella, F. & Colasuonno, L. & Del Fatto, V., 2022. "Effect of green wall installation on urban heat island and building energy use: A climate-informed systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Yu Qiao & Zehui Yang & Yi-Xuan Li, 2025. "Urban Thermal Regulation Through Cold Island Network Evolution: Patterns, Drivers, and Scenario-Based Planning Insights from Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Enrico Gottero & Claudia Cassatella & Federica Larcher, 2021. "Planning Peri-Urban Open Spaces: Methods and Tools for Interpretation and Classification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Carla Balocco & Giacomo Pierucci & Cristina Piselli, 2025. "Green System Effects on Energy Environmental Sustainability of Urban Built-Up Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Rifat Olgun & Nihat Karakuş & Serdar Selim & Tahsin Yilmaz & Reyhan Erdoğan & Meliha Aklıbaşında & Burçin Dönmez & Mert Çakır & Zeynep R. Ardahanlıoğlu, 2025. "Impacts of Landscape Composition on Land Surface Temperature in Expanding Desert Cities: A Case Study in Arizona, USA," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-30, June.
    7. Gabriele Battista & Emanuele de Lieto Vollaro & Luca Evangelisti & Roberto de Lieto Vollaro, 2022. "Urban Overheating Mitigation Strategies Opportunities: A Case Study of a Square in Rome (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Lin, Zih-Hong & Laffan, Shawn W. & Metternicht, Graciela, 2025. "Strategically identifying optimal locations for multifunctional green infrastructure: A case study in the Taipei Basin," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Abdul Naser Majidi & Zoran Vojinovic & Alida Alves & Sutat Weesakul & Arlex Sanchez & Floris Boogaard & Jeroen Kluck, 2019. "Planning Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Flood Reduction and Thermal Comfort Enhancement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-27, November.
    10. Chen Qu & Wen Li & Jia Xu & Song Shi, 2023. "Blackland Conservation and Utilization, Carbon Storage and Ecological Risk in Green Space: A Case Study from Heilongjiang Province in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Dechao Chen & Xinliang Xu & Zongyao Sun & Luo Liu & Zhi Qiao & Tai Huang, 2019. "Assessment of Urban Heat Risk in Mountain Environments: A Case Study of Chongqing Metropolitan Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Maryam Norouzi & Hing-Wah Chau & Elmira Jamei, 2024. "Design and Site-Related Factors Impacting the Cooling Performance of Urban Parks in Different Climate Zones: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-42, December.
    13. Patrycia Brzoska & Aiga Spāģe, 2020. "From City- to Site-Dimension: Assessing the Urban Ecosystem Services of Different Types of Green Infrastructure," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Dikman Maheng & Assela Pathirana & Chris Zevenbergen, 2021. "A Preliminary Study on the Impact of Landscape Pattern Changes Due to Urbanization: Case Study of Jakarta, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Sorin Geacu & Ines Grigorescu, 2022. "Historical Changes in Urban and Peri-Urban Forests: Evidence from the Galați Area, Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, November.
    16. Sebastiani, A. & Buonocore, E. & Franzese, P.P. & Riccio, A. & Chianese, E. & Nardella, L. & Manes, F., 2021. "Modeling air quality regulation by green infrastructure in a Mediterranean coastal urban area: The removal of PM10 in the Metropolitan City of Naples (Italy)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    17. Uta Schirpke & Erich Tasser, 2021. "Trends in Ecosystem Services across Europe Due to Land-Use/Cover Changes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, June.
    18. Lin Wang & Tian Chen & Yang Yu & Liuying Wang & Huiyi Zang & Yun Cang & Ya’ou Zhang & Xiaowen Ma, 2024. "Impacts of Vegetation Ratio, Street Orientation, and Aspect Ratio on Thermal Comfort and Building Carbon Emissions in Cold Zones: A Case Study of Tianjin," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Lei Li & Ali Cheshmehzangi & Faith Ka Shun Chan & Christopher D. Ives, 2021. "Mapping the Research Landscape of Nature-Based Solutions in Urbanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-41, April.
    20. Joanna Badach & Jakub Szczepański & Wojciech Bonenberg & Jacek Gębicki & Lucyna Nyka, 2022. "Developing the Urban Blue-Green Infrastructure as a Tool for Urban Air Quality Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4791-:d:542789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.