IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3378-d519957.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Dissection of Salt Tolerance for Sustainable Wheat Production in Sodic Agro-Ecosystems through Farmers’ Participatory Approach: An Indian Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Parvender Sheoran

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)

  • Arvind Kumar

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)

  • Raman Sharma

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)

  • Kailash Prajapat

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)

  • Ashwani Kumar

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)

  • Arijit Barman

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)

  • R. Raju

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)

  • Satyendra Kumar

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)

  • Yousuf Jaffer Dar

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)

  • Ranjay K. Singh

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)

  • Satish Kumar Sanwal

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)

  • Rajender Kumar Yadav

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)

  • Ved Prakash Chahal

    (Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 110001, India)

  • Parbodh Chander Sharma

    (ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)

Abstract

To explore the comparative effects of field sodicity (soil pH) and irrigation water residual alkalinity (RSC iw ) on physiological and biochemical attributes of salt tolerance, and crop performance of two wheat varieties (KRL 210, HD 2967), a total of 308 on-farm trials were carried out in sodicity affected Ghaghar Basin of Haryana, India. Salt tolerant variety KRL 210 maintained relatively higher leaf relative water content (RWC; 1.9%), photosynthetic rate (Pn; 5.1%), stomatal conductance (gS; 6.6%), and transpiration (E; 4.1%) with lower membrane injury (MII; −8.5%), and better control on accumulation of free proline (P; −18.4%), Na + /K + in shoot (NaK_S; −23.1%) and root (NaK_R; −18.7%) portion compared to traditional HD 2967. Altered physiological response suppressed important yield-related traits revealing repressive effects of sodicity stress on wheat yields; albeit to a lesser extent in KRL 210 with each gradual increase in soil pH (0.77–1.10 t ha −1 ) and RSC iw (0.29–0.33 t ha −1 ). HD 2967 significantly outyielded KRL 210 only at soil pH ≤ 8.2 and RSC iw ≤ 2.5 me L −1 . By comparisons, substantial improvements in salt tolerance potential of KRL 210 with increasing sodicity stress compensated in attaining significantly higher yields as and when soil pH becomes >8.7 and RSC iw > 4 me L −1 . Designing such variety-oriented threshold limits of sodicity tolerance in wheat will help address the challenge to enhance crop resilience, closing the yield gaps and improve rural livelihood under the existing or predicted levels of salt stress.

Suggested Citation

  • Parvender Sheoran & Arvind Kumar & Raman Sharma & Kailash Prajapat & Ashwani Kumar & Arijit Barman & R. Raju & Satyendra Kumar & Yousuf Jaffer Dar & Ranjay K. Singh & Satish Kumar Sanwal & Rajender Ku, 2021. "Quantitative Dissection of Salt Tolerance for Sustainable Wheat Production in Sodic Agro-Ecosystems through Farmers’ Participatory Approach: An Indian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3378-:d:519957
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3378/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3378/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farooq Shah & Wei Wu, 2019. "Soil and Crop Management Strategies to Ensure Higher Crop Productivity within Sustainable Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Tingting Liu & Randall J. F. Bruins & Matthew T. Heberling, 2018. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Adoption of Best Management Practices: A Review and Synthesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.
    3. van Straten, G. & de Vos, A.C. & Rozema, J. & Bruning, B. & van Bodegom, P.M., 2019. "An improved methodology to evaluate crop salt tolerance from field trials," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 375-387.
    4. Sheoran, Parvender & Basak, Nirmalendu & Kumar, Ashwani & Yadav, R.K. & Singh, Randhir & Sharma, Raman & Kumar, Satyendra & Singh, Ranjay K. & Sharma, P.C., 2021. "Ameliorants and salt tolerant varieties improve rice-wheat production in soils undergoing sodification with alkali water irrigation in Indo–Gangetic Plains of India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Qadir, M. & Sharma, B.R. & Bruggeman, A. & Choukr-Allah, R. & Karajeh, F., 2007. "Non-conventional water resources and opportunities for water augmentation to achieve food security in water scarce countries," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 2-22, January.
    6. Minhas, P.S. & Qadir, Manzoor & Yadav, R.K., 2019. "Groundwater irrigation induced soil sodification and response options," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 74-85.
    7. Minhas, Paramjit Singh & Bali, Aradhana & Bhardwaj, Ajay Kumar & Singh, Awtar & Yadav, Rajender Kumar, 2021. "Structural stability and hydraulic characteristics of soils irrigated for two decades with waters having residual alkalinity and its neutralization with gypsum and sulfuric acid," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    8. Rhoades, J. D., 1989. "Intercepting, isolating and reusing drainage waters for irrigation to conserve water and protect water quality," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(1-2), pages 37-52, August.
    9. Murtaza, G. & Ghafoor, A. & Qadir, M., 2006. "Irrigation and soil management strategies for using saline-sodic water in a cotton-wheat rotation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(1-2), pages 98-114, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seidu, Razak & Drechsel, Pay, 2011. "Analyse cout-efficacite des interventions pour reduire les maladies diarrheiques chez les consommateurs de laitues irriguees avec des eaux usees au Ghana. In French," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Minhas, Paramjit Singh & Bali, Aradhana & Bhardwaj, Ajay Kumar & Singh, Awtar & Yadav, Rajender Kumar, 2021. "Structural stability and hydraulic characteristics of soils irrigated for two decades with waters having residual alkalinity and its neutralization with gypsum and sulfuric acid," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    3. Wang, He & Zheng, Chunlian & Ning, Songrui & Cao, Caiyun & Li, Kejiang & Dang, Hongkai & Wu, Yuqing & Zhang, Junpeng, 2023. "Impacts of long-term saline water irrigation on soil properties and crop yields under maize-wheat crop rotation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    4. Vinod Phogat & Tim Pitt & Paul Petrie & Jirka Šimůnek & Michael Cutting, 2023. "Optimization of Irrigation of Wine Grapes with Brackish Water for Managing Soil Salinization," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-29, October.
    5. Heidarpour, M. & Mostafazadeh-Fard, B. & Abedi Koupai, J. & Malekian, R., 2007. "The effects of treated wastewater on soil chemical properties using subsurface and surface irrigation methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(1-2), pages 87-94, May.
    6. Manogna R. L. & Aswini Kumar Mishra, 2022. "Agricultural production efficiency of Indian states: Evidence from data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 4244-4255, October.
    7. Zehra Ekin, 2019. "Integrated Use of Humic Acid and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria to Ensure Higher Potato Productivity in Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, June.
    8. Zvi Baum & Ruslana Rachel Palatnik & Iddo Kan & Mickey Rapaport-Rom, 2016. "Economic Impacts of Water Scarcity Under Diverse Water Salinities," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(01), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Sicheng Zhang & Rui Zhao & Kening Wu & Qin Huang & Long Kang, 2021. "Effects of the Rapid Construction of a High-Quality Plough Layer Based on Woody Peat in a Newly Reclaimed Cultivated Land Area," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Ghalia Saleem Aljeddani, 2022. "Reusing Sewage Effluent in Greening Urban Areas: A Case Study of: Southern Jeddah, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Calzadilla, Alvaro & Rehdanz, Katrin & Tol, Richard S.J., 2008. "Water scarcity and the impact of improved irrigation management: A CGE analysis," Conference papers 331788, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Zijie Sang & Ge Zhang & Haiqing Wang & Wangyang Zhang & Yuxiu Chen & Mingyang Han & Ke Yang, 2023. "Effective Solutions to Ecological and Water Environment Problems in the Sanjiang Plain: Utilization of Farmland Drainage Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, November.
    13. Massamba Diop & Ngonidzashe Chirinda & Adnane Beniaich & Mohamed El Gharous & Khalil El Mejahed, 2022. "Soil and Water Conservation in Africa: State of Play and Potential Role in Tackling Soil Degradation and Building Soil Health in Agricultural Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-29, October.
    14. Oscar Montes de Oca Munguia & Rick Llewellyn, 2020. "The Adopters versus the Technology: Which Matters More when Predicting or Explaining Adoption?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 80-91, March.
    15. Kristina Beethem & Sandra T. Marquart-Pyatt & Jennifer Lai & Tian Guo, 2023. "Navigating the information landscape: public and private information source access by midwest farmers," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1117-1135, September.
    16. Mabasa, Nyiko C. & Jones, Clifford L.W. & Laing, Mark, 2021. "The use of treated brewery effluent for salt tolerant crop irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    17. Yun Wu & Hui Wang & Jinbin Zhu, 2022. "Influence of Reclaimed Water Quality on Infiltration Characteristics of Typical Subtropical Zone Soils: A Case Study in South China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    18. Massey, J.H. & Reba, M.L. & Adviento-Borbe, M.A. & Chiu, Y.L. & Payne, G.K., 2022. "Direct comparisons of four irrigation systems on a commercial rice farm: Irrigation water use efficiencies and water dynamics," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    19. Pongspikul, Tayatorn & McCann, Laura M., 2020. "Farmers’ Adoption of Pressure Irrigation Systems: The Case of Cotton Producers in the Southeastern versus Southwestern U.S," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304332, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Mohamed Ghali & Maha Ben Jaballah & Nejla Ben Arfa & Annie Sigwalt, 2022. "Analysis of factors that influence adoption of agroecological practices in viticulture," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 179-209, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3378-:d:519957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.