IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p648-d478657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Team Dynamics Perceptions, Motivation, and Anxiety in University Athletes

Author

Listed:
  • Orlando Reyes-Hernández

    (Faculty of Sports Organization, Autonomous University of Nuevo León, 66455 San Nicolás de los Garza, Mexico)

  • José Tristán

    (Faculty of Sports Organization, Autonomous University of Nuevo León, 66455 San Nicolás de los Garza, Mexico)

  • Jeanette M. López-Walle

    (Faculty of Sports Organization, Autonomous University of Nuevo León, 66455 San Nicolás de los Garza, Mexico)

  • Alexandre García-Mas

    (Faculty of Psychology, GICAFE Research Group, University of Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma, Spain)

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the interrelation between team dynamics with motivation types and anxiety factors in university athletes, highlighting the role played by team members’ point of view and coach’s point of view. Participants were 674 university athletes, men (46.4%) and women (53.6%), from different sports, with an age range between 18 and 28 years ( M = 21.06; SD = 2.07). Instruments used were Cooperation Workteam Questionnaire (CWQ), the Sports Motivation Scale (SMS-II), and the Sports Anxiety Scale (SAS-2). The model from the team member’s point of view presented adequate fit indices (χ 2 ( 924 ) = 2690.17, χ 2 /df = 2.91, CFI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.05), same as the model from the coach’s point of view (χ 2 ( 924 ) = 2692.82, χ 2 /df = 2.99, CFI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.05). The results obtained in both models show five indirect effects, two of them between team dynamics from both points of view with somatic anxiety and deconcentration, with autonomous motivation as a mediator, and the other three between the team dynamics from both perspectives with somatic anxiety, worry, and deconcentration, having controlled motivation as a mediator.

Suggested Citation

  • Orlando Reyes-Hernández & José Tristán & Jeanette M. López-Walle & Alexandre García-Mas, 2021. "Team Dynamics Perceptions, Motivation, and Anxiety in University Athletes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:648-:d:478657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandre García-Mas & Antonio Núñez Prats & Aurelio Olmedilla & Roberto Ruiz-Barquín & Enrique Cantón, 2019. "Levels of Cognitive Congruence between Managers and Team Members’ Perceptions of Cooperation at Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Yan Ling & Zeki Simsek & Michael Lubatkin & John F. Veiga, 2008. "The impact of transformational CEOs on the performance of small- to medium-sized firms : Does organizational context matter?," Post-Print hal-02312589, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silke Eisenbeiss & Daan Knippenberg & Clemens Fahrbach, 2015. "Doing Well by Doing Good? Analyzing the Relationship Between CEO Ethical Leadership and Firm Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 635-651, May.
    2. Meissner, Philip & Wulf, Torsten, 2014. "Antecendents and effects of decision comprehensiveness: The role of decision quality and perceived uncertainty," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 625-635.
    3. Yan Ling & Michelle Hammond & Li-Qun Wei, 2022. "Ethical leadership and ambidexterity in young firms: examining the CEO-TMT Interface," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 25-48, March.
    4. Jacek WOŹNIAK, 2017. "Some Factors Hindering Acceptance of Three Gamification Solutions in Motivation Systems, in Small and Medium Enterprises," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(4), pages 663-680, December.
    5. Long Lam & Xu Huang & Dora Lau, 2012. "Leadership research in Asia: Taking the road less traveled?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 195-204, June.
    6. Kang, Jae Hyeung & Matusik, James G. & Kim, Tae-Yeol & Phillips, J. Mark, 2016. "Interactive effects of multiple organizational climates on employee innovative behavior in entrepreneurial firms: A cross-level investigation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 628-642.
    7. Debasis Bharadwaj & Ayesha Farooq & Biranchi N Jena, 2017. "Value Discipline Dimensions on Organisational Performance and Competitive Advantage: A Study on Pharmaceutical Companies in Diabetes Care," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 88-102, April.
    8. D’Allura, Giorgia Maria, 2019. "The leading role of the top management team in understanding family firms: Past research and future directions," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 87-104.
    9. Katharina Fellnhofer, 2019. "The Complementary Effects Of Firms’ And Team Leaders’ Entrepreneurial Orientation On Innovation Success And Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-32, June.
    10. Philip Meissner & Torsten Wulf, 2016. "Debiasing illusion of control in individual judgment: the role of internal and external advice seeking," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 245-263, March.
    11. Erkki Laitinen, 2014. "The association between CEO work, management accounting information, and financial performance: evidence from Finnish top managers," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 25(3), pages 221-257, December.
    12. Sureka, Riya & Kumar, Satish & Colombage, Sisira & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul, 2022. "Five decades of research on capital budgeting – A systematic review and future research agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    13. Wei, Li-Qun & Ling, Yan, 2015. "CEO characteristics and corporate entrepreneurship in transition economies: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1157-1165.
    14. Kristina Reineke & Holger Steinmetz & Rodrigo Isidor & Rüdiger Kabst, 2020. "Women on Top Management Teams and Firm Performance in German Medium-Sized Enterprises: The Moderating Role of Recruiting Source," Working Papers Dissertations 60, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    15. Kwon, Shin Hyoung & Kim, Joongseo & Yim, Hyunsoon (Sean), 2023. "Looking far or close: The explanatory role of myopic management in the relationship between CEO-TMT power disparity and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Sarabi, Almasa & Froese, Fabian J. & Chng, Daniel H.M. & Meyer, Klaus E., 2020. "Entrepreneurial leadership and MNE subsidiary performance: The moderating role of subsidiary context," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    17. Donze, Jocelyn & Simard-Casanova, Olivier, 2018. "Managing Employees 'Insides' to Remedy Agency Problems? A Model of Transformational Leadership," MPRA Paper 94459, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Haber, Liat & Carmeli, Abraham, 2023. "Leading the challenges of implementing new technologies in organizations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    19. Neale J. Slack & Gurmeet Singh & Jashwini Narayan & Shavneet Sharma, 2020. "Servant Leadership in the Public Sector: Employee Perspective," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 631-646, December.
    20. Riya Sureka & Satish Kumar & Deepraj Mukherjee & Christina Theodoraki, 2023. "What restricts SMEs from adopting sophisticated capital budgeting practices?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 265-290, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:648-:d:478657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.