IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11566-d660324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between the Implementation of ERP Systems and the Financial and Non-Financial Reporting of Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Laura-Eugenia-Lavinia Barna

    (Accounting Doctoral School, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Bogdan-Ștefan Ionescu

    (Management Informatics Systems Department, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Liliana Ionescu-Feleagă

    (Accounting Department, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that ERP systems can improve organizational performance and efficiency. Thus, the main concepts addressed in the paper are ERP systems, their performance and the manner in which they improve financial and non-financial reporting. The purpose of this paper is to observe the relationship between ERP systems and financial reporting. The role of these systems is to ensure transparency over the financial and non-financial reporting process of an organization. The research method is represented by an archival analysis (organization’s annual reports) to highlight the relationship between ERP systems and financial and non-financial reporting, given the impact of ERP systems on the information used to prepare financial and non-financial reports and how the organization changes after implementing these systems. The results highlight the significant role of ERP systems within an organization, in terms of performance and improvements in financial and non-financial reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura-Eugenia-Lavinia Barna & Bogdan-Ștefan Ionescu & Liliana Ionescu-Feleagă, 2021. "The Relationship between the Implementation of ERP Systems and the Financial and Non-Financial Reporting of Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11566-:d:660324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11566/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11566/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valentin Florentin Dumitru & Nadia Albu & Cătălin Nicolae Albu & Mădălina Dumitru, 2013. "ERP implementation and organizational performance. A Romanian case study of best practices," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(34), pages 518-531, June.
    2. Mandal, Purnendu & Gunasekaran, A., 2003. "Issues in implementing ERP: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 274-283, April.
    3. Claudia Catalina CIOCAN & Mihai CARP & Iuliana GEORGESCU, 2021. "The Determinants of the Financial Reporting Quality: Empirical Evidence for Romania," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 19(162), pages 301-301, May.
    4. Cristóbal Sánchez‐Rodríguez & Gary Spraakman, 2012. "ERP systems and management accounting: a multiple case study," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(4), pages 398-414, November.
    5. Michal Pohludka & Hana Stverkova & Beata Ślusarczyk, 2018. "Implementation and Unification of the ERP System in a Global Company as a Strategic Decision for Sustainable Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Soukaina Elhasnaoui, 2021. "Analysis of the Role of IT Governance on ERP Systems Implementation," International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), IGI Global, vol. 16(1), pages 18-26, January.
    7. Elena NECHITA, 2021. "The Value Relevance of Non-Financial Reporting in Determining the Market Value of Equity," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 19(162), pages 320-320, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alin Marius Andrieș & Iulia Ungureanu, 2022. "ERP and Performance of Companies in Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Florin Mihai & Ofelia Ema Aleca & Andrei Stanciu & Mirela Gheorghe & Mirela Stan, 2022. "Digitalization—The Engine of Sustainability in the Energy Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justyna Patalas-Maliszewska & Hanna Łosyk, 2020. "An Approach to Assessing Sustainability in the Development of a Manufacturing Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Aloini, Davide & Dulmin, Riccardo & Mininno, Valeria, 2012. "Modelling and assessing ERP project risks: A Petri Net approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 484-495.
    3. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:37-48 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Tetiana Vlasenko & Anatolii Hatsko & Tetiana Larina & Yevhen Hryn & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis, 2019. "Fuzzy Evaluation of Change Management Processes in the Context of Enterprise Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-11, November.
    5. Victoria Bogdan & Luminita Rus & Dana Simona Gherai & Adrian Gheorghe Florea & Nicoleta Georgeta Bugnar, 2023. "A Streamline Sustainable Business Performance Reporting Model by an Integrated FinESG Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Petra Horváthová & Marie Mikušová & Kateřina Kashi, 2020. "Comparison of Human Resources Management in Non-Family and Family Businesses: Case Study of the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Minodora Ursacescu & Dan Popescu & Cristina State & Ion Smeureanu, 2019. "Assessing the Greenness of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems through Green IT Solutions: A Romanian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-32, August.
    8. Laura-Eugenia-Lavinia BARNA & Bogdan-Åžtefan IONESCU, 2021. "The Process Of Digitalization Of An Accounting Organization Using Erp Systems," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(23), pages 1-1.
    9. Lauri Lepistö, 2014. "Taking information technology seriously: on the legitimating discourses of enterprise resource planning system adoption," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 25(3), pages 193-219, December.
    10. Sameh Ammar & Ghassan H. Mardini, 2021. "Enterprise resource planning enabling segmental information reporting practices of UK‐FTSE 100," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 1205-1237, March.
    11. Zheng Tang & Yuemeng Ge, 2022. "CNN model optimization and intelligent balance model for material demand forecast," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(3), pages 978-986, December.
    12. Dana Kiseľáková & Beáta Šofranková & Miroslav Gombár & Veronika Čabinová & Erika Onuferová, 2019. "Competitiveness and Its Impact on Sustainability, Business Environment, and Human Development of EU (28) Countries in terms of Global Multi-Criteria Indices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-25, June.
    13. Cao Minh Anh Nguyen & Minh-Tri Ha, 2023. "The interplay between internal communication, employee engagement, job satisfaction, and employee loyalty in higher education institutions in Vietnam," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Raul Oltra-Badenes & Hermenegildo Gil-Gomez & Vicente Guerola-Navarro & Pau Vicedo, 2019. "Is It Possible to Manage the Product Recovery Processes in an ERP? Analysis of Functional Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Barna Laura-Eugenia-Lavinia & Igna Roxana Dana, 2021. "The influence of the implementation of ERP systems on the performance of an organization," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 268-279, December.
    16. Yeh, Chung-Hsing & Xu, Yan, 2013. "Managing critical success strategies for an enterprise resource planning project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 604-614.
    17. Mojtaba Ashja & Akram Hadizadeh Moghadam & Hamid Bidram, 2015. "Comparative study of large information systems’ CSFs during their life cycle," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 619-628, June.
    18. Iskander Zouaghi & Abderrazak Laghouag, 2016. "Aligning key success factors to ERP implementation strategy: learning from a case study," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(1), pages 100-115.
    19. Clyde Holsapple & Mark Sena & William Wagner, 2019. "The perceived success of ERP systems for decision support," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-7, March.
    20. Kamaruzzaman Muhammad & Nor’Azam Mastuki & Faizah Darus & Erlane K Ghani*, 2018. "Critical Success Factors for AIS Change: A Case Study in an Agricultural Company," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 904-915:5.
    21. Tatijana Minic & Bratislav Petrovic & Oliver Ilic, 2013. "A new approach to integral information system of a company for business and sustainable development," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(Special 7), pages 769-783, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11566-:d:660324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.