IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p11042-d650490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Potential Barriers to the Implementation of an Innovative AB-FB Energy Storage System under a Sustainable Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • María Blecua-de-Pedro

    (Research Centre for Energy Resources and Consumption (CIRCE), 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Maryori C. Díaz-Ramírez

    (Research Centre for Energy Resources and Consumption (CIRCE), 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
    Instituto Universitario de Investigación CIRCE, Fundación CIRCE, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

Abstract

The novel acid–base flow battery technology stores electrical energy using pH and salinity gradients in water and is suitable for different capacities (kWh–MWh scale) because of its scalable technology. Due to the flexibility of this system, it is predicted to provide technical, economic, and environmental benefits for supporting renewable energy integration, such as wind and solar energy, within the electricity generation system. However, its level of acceptance might be affected by additional conditioning factors in terms of policies and maintenance. To elucidate the relevance of the possible barriers to the implementation of the innovative AB-FB system, this work introduces an approach based on the analytic hierarchy process developed at three levels of hierarchy under a sustainability perspective. An exhaustive literature review as well as an assessment of experts’ evaluations were performed to identify the barriers in terms of technical, economic, environmental, policy, and maintenance aspects. Based on the results, the cost parameters (mostly attributed to the stack cost), followed by technical and environmental criteria, were deemed to be of the highest priority.

Suggested Citation

  • María Blecua-de-Pedro & Maryori C. Díaz-Ramírez, 2021. "Assessment of Potential Barriers to the Implementation of an Innovative AB-FB Energy Storage System under a Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:11042-:d:650490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/11042/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/11042/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mao, Jiachen & Jafari, Mehdi & Botterud, Audun, 2022. "Planning low-carbon distributed power systems: Evaluating the role of energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    2. Escalante Soberanis, M.A. & Mithrush, T. & Bassam, A. & Mérida, W., 2018. "A sensitivity analysis to determine technical and economic feasibility of energy storage systems implementation: A flow battery case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 547-557.
    3. Keck, Felix & Lenzen, Manfred & Vassallo, Anthony & Li, Mengyu, 2019. "The impact of battery energy storage for renewable energy power grids in Australia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 647-657.
    4. Pusceddu, Elian & Zakeri, Behnam & Castagneto Gissey, Giorgio, 2021. "Synergies between energy arbitrage and fast frequency response for battery energy storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. Ribeiro, Fernando & Ferreira, Paula & Araújo, Madalena, 2013. "Evaluating future scenarios for the power generation sector using a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) tool: The Portuguese case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 126-136.
    6. Andrea Zaffora & Andrea Culcasi & Luigi Gurreri & Alessandro Cosenza & Alessandro Tamburini & Monica Santamaria & Giorgio Micale, 2020. "Energy Harvesting by Waste Acid/Base Neutralization via Bipolar Membrane Reverse Electrodialysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    7. Maryori C. Díaz-Ramírez & Victor J. Ferreira & Tatiana García-Armingol & Ana M. López-Sabirón & Germán Ferreira, 2020. "Battery Manufacturing Resource Assessment to Minimise Component Production Environmental Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Anna Kurbatova & Hani Ahmed Abu-Qdais, 2020. "Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Select Waste to Energy Technology for a Mega City: The Case of Moscow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Haisheng Chen & Xinjing Zhang & Jinchao Liu & Chunqing Tan, 2013. "Compressed Air Energy Storage," Chapters, in: Ahmed F. Zobaa (ed.), Energy Storage - Technologies and Applications, IntechOpen.
    10. Culcasi, Andrea & Gurreri, Luigi & Zaffora, Andrea & Cosenza, Alessandro & Tamburini, Alessandro & Micale, Giorgio, 2020. "On the modelling of an Acid/Base Flow Battery: An innovative electrical energy storage device based on pH and salinity gradients," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    11. repec:eco:journ2:2017-04-06 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Stefano Ubertini & Andrea Luigi Facci & Luca Andreassi, 2017. "Hybrid Hydrogen and Mechanical Distributed Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Kapila, Sahil & Oni, Abayomi Olufemi & Kumar, Amit, 2017. "The development of techno-economic models for large-scale energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 656-672.
    14. Maryori C. Díaz-Ramírez & Víctor J. Ferreira & Tatiana García-Armingol & Ana María López-Sabirón & Germán Ferreira, 2020. "Environmental Assessment of Electrochemical Energy Storage Device Manufacturing to Identify Drivers for Attaining Goals of Sustainable Materials 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    15. He, Guannan & Ciez, Rebecca & Moutis, Panayiotis & Kar, Soummya & Whitacre, Jay F., 2020. "The economic end of life of electrochemical energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    16. Mardani, Abbas & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Khalifah, Zainab & Zakuan, Norhayati & Jusoh, Ahmad & Nor, Khalil Md & Khoshnoudi, Masoumeh, 2017. "A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 216-256.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María Dolores Mainar-Toledo & Maryori Díaz-Ramírez & Snorri J. Egilsson & Claudio Zuffi & Giampaolo Manfrida & Héctor Leiva, 2023. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Nesjavellir Geothermal Power Plant for Heat and Electricity Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. María Dolores Mainar-Toledo & Maider Gómez Palmero & Maryori Díaz-Ramírez & Iñaki Mendioroz & David Zambrana-Vasquez, 2023. "A Multi-Criteria Approach to Evaluate Sustainability: A Case Study of the Navarrese Wine Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Jinyang & Liu, Wei & Jiang, Deyi & Chen, Junchao & Ngaha Tiedeu, William & Chen, Jie & JJK, Deaman, 2018. "Thermodynamic and applicability analysis of a hybrid CAES system using abandoned coal mine in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 31-44.
    2. Cheayb, Mohamad & Marin Gallego, Mylène & Tazerout, Mohand & Poncet, Sébastien, 2022. "A techno-economic analysis of small-scale trigenerative compressed air energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    3. McKenna, R. & Bertsch, V. & Mainzer, K. & Fichtner, W., 2018. "Combining local preferences with multi-criteria decision analysis and linear optimization to develop feasible energy concepts in small communities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1092-1110.
    4. María Dolores Mainar-Toledo & Maryori Díaz-Ramírez & Snorri J. Egilsson & Claudio Zuffi & Giampaolo Manfrida & Héctor Leiva, 2023. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Nesjavellir Geothermal Power Plant for Heat and Electricity Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    5. McIlwaine, Neil & Foley, Aoife M. & Best, Robert & Morrow, D. John & Kez, Dlzar Al, 2023. "Modelling the effect of distributed battery energy storage in an isolated power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    6. Schleifer, Anna H. & Murphy, Caitlin A. & Cole, Wesley J. & Denholm, Paul, 2022. "Exploring the design space of PV-plus-battery system configurations under evolving grid conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    7. Zhang, Wenyi & Wei, Wei & Chen, Laijun & Zheng, Boshen & Mei, Shengwei, 2020. "Service pricing and load dispatch of residential shared energy storage unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    8. Wang, Xing & Li, Wen & Zhang, Xuehui & Zhu, Yangli & Zuo, Zhitao & Chen, Haisheng, 2019. "Efficiency improvement of a CAES low aspect ratio radial inflow turbine by NACA blade profile," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1214-1231.
    9. Widjonarko & Rudy Soenoko & Slamet Wahyudi & Eko Siswanto, 2019. "Comparison of Intelligence Control Systems for Voltage Controlling on Small Scale Compressed Air Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Fan, Jinyang & Xie, Heping & Chen, Jie & Jiang, Deyi & Li, Cunbao & Ngaha Tiedeu, William & Ambre, Julien, 2020. "Preliminary feasibility analysis of a hybrid pumped-hydro energy storage system using abandoned coal mine goafs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    11. Rahman, Md Mustafizur & Oni, Abayomi Olufemi & Gemechu, Eskinder & Kumar, Amit, 2021. "The development of techno-economic models for the assessment of utility-scale electro-chemical battery storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    12. Chen, Long Xiang & Xie, Mei Na & Zhao, Pan Pan & Wang, Feng Xiang & Hu, Peng & Wang, Dong Xiang, 2018. "A novel isobaric adiabatic compressed air energy storage (IA-CAES) system on the base of volatile fluid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 198-210.
    13. Qian, Jiaxin & Wu, Jiahui & Yao, Lei & Mahmut, Saniye & Zhang, Qiang, 2021. "Comprehensive performance evaluation of Wind-Solar-CCHP system based on emergy analysis and multi-objective decision method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    14. Yang, Dechang & Wang, Ming & Yang, Ruiqi & Zheng, Yingying & Pandzic, Hrvoje, 2021. "Optimal dispatching of an energy system with integrated compressed air energy storage and demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    15. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid & Nemery, Philippe, 2016. "Which energy mix for the UK (United Kingdom)? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA (graphical analysis for interactive aid)–AHP (analytic hierarchy process) visualization tool," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 602-611.
    16. Houssainy, Sammy & Janbozorgi, Mohammad & Ip, Peggy & Kavehpour, Pirouz, 2018. "Thermodynamic analysis of a high temperature hybrid compressed air energy storage (HTH-CAES) system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1043-1054.
    17. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    18. Gennadiy Stroykov & Alexey Y. Cherepovitsyn & Elizaveta A. Iamshchikova, 2020. "Powering Multiple Gas Condensate Wells in Russia’s Arctic: Power Supply Systems Based on Renewable Energy Sources," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Liu, Jin-Long & Wang, Jian-Hua, 2015. "Thermodynamic analysis of a novel tri-generation system based on compressed air energy storage and pneumatic motor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 420-429.
    20. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:11042-:d:650490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.