IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i18p10372-d637242.html

Effect of Environmental Management Practices and Sustainability on Some Selected Manufacturing Firms in South East Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Obamen

    (Management Department, University of Nigeria, Enugu 400213, Nigeria)

  • Solomon Omonona

    (Business Management Department, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, South Africa)

  • Olabanji Oni

    (Business Management Department, University of Fort Hare, Alice 5700, South Africa)

  • Olamide Felix Ohunyeye

    (Management Department, University of Nigeria, Enugu 400213, Nigeria)

Abstract

The manufacturing sector in South East Nigeria has many challenges concerning the incorporation of sustainability into the corporate strategies and operations of the industry, given its extractive nature and the numerous social and environmental impacts related to production activity. Attaining organizational sustainability requires the implementation of environmental management practice tools that create long-term value by embracing opportunities and managing risks derived from economic, environmental, and social developments. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of environmental management practice tools on the sustainability of manufacturing organizations. The goal of the study was to determine the relationship between environmental management practice tools and sustainability. A survey design was used for this study. A total of 363 questionnaires were distributed to the employees of the manufacturing firms, which included managers, supervisors, and line staff. The data collected were analyzed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Primarily, the study established that environmental management practice tools were significantly and positively related to sustainability. Thus, the study concluded that environmental management practice tools contribute significantly and positively to firms’ social, economic, and environmental sustainability. Additionally, the result of this study underlines the significance to manufacturing firms of carrying out environmental management practices. The ramifications are that manufacturing firms attempting to assert sustainability through EMP should have related knowledge with EMP. Furthermore, their environmental advantages will not convert into sustainability. The study adds to the body of knowledge by giving experimental pieces of proof identifying the interrelationships between EMP and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Obamen & Solomon Omonona & Olabanji Oni & Olamide Felix Ohunyeye, 2021. "Effect of Environmental Management Practices and Sustainability on Some Selected Manufacturing Firms in South East Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10372-:d:637242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10372/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10372/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lingming Chen & Wenzhong Ye & Congjia Huo & Kieran James, 2020. "Environmental Regulations, the Industrial Structure, and High-Quality Regional Economic Development: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Nicole Darnall & G. Jason Jolley & Robert Handfield, 2008. "Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: complements for sustainability?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 30-45, January.
    3. Henri, Jean-François & Journeault, Marc, 2010. "Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 63-80, January.
    4. Sarkis, Joseph & Zhu, Qinghua & Lai, Kee-hung, 2011. "An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Mundaca, Luis & Markandya, Anil, 2016. "Assessing regional progress towards a ‘Green Energy Economy’," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1372-1394.
    6. C. Trumpp & J. Endrikat & C. Zopf & E. Guenther, 2015. "Definition, Conceptualization, and Measurement of Corporate Environmental Performance: A Critical Examination of a Multidimensional Construct," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(2), pages 185-204, January.
    7. Longyu Shi & Linwei Han & Fengmei Yang & Lijie Gao, 2019. "The Evolution of Sustainable Development Theory: Types, Goals, and Research Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Ibrahim Falqi & Saleh Alsulamy & Mohamed Mansour, 2020. "Environmental Performance Evaluation and Analysis Using ISO 14031 Guidelines in Construction Sector Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Ionut Viorel Herghiligiu & Ioan-Bogdan Robu & Marius Pislaru & Adrian Vilcu & Anca Laura Asandului & Silvia Avasilcăi & Catalin Balan, 2019. "Sustainable Environmental Management System Integration and Business Performance: A Balance Assessment Approach Using Fuzzy Logic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-30, September.
    10. Tatbita Titin Suhariyanto & Dzuraidah Abd Wahab & Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman, 2018. "Product Design Evaluation Using Life Cycle Assessment and Design for Assembly: A Case Study of a Water Leakage Alarm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.
    11. Dayna Simpson & Danny Samson, 2010. "Environmental strategy and low waste operations: exploring complementarities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 104-118, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kurniawati, 2023. "Sustainable Textile Practices by Integrated Viscose Rayon and Yarn Producers: An Empirical Study," GATR Journals jfbr210, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    2. Maryam Jamilah Asha’ari & Salina Daud & Norazah Mohd Suki, 2023. "Linking Sustainable Design and Social Sustainability Performance of Chemical Manufacturing Firms: Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Hartmann & Stephan Vachon, 2018. "Linking Environmental Management to Environmental Performance: The Interactive Role of Industry Context," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 359-374, March.
    2. Guo Li & Ming K. Lim & Zhaohua Wang, 2020. "Stakeholders, green manufacturing, and practice performance: empirical evidence from Chinese fashion businesses," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 961-982, July.
    3. S. Maryam Masoumi & Nima Kazemi & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid, 2019. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Automotive Industry: A Process-Oriented Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-30, July.
    4. Cosmina L. Voinea & Bas-Jan Hoogenberg & Cosmin Fratostiteanu & Hammad Bin Azam Hashmi, 2020. "The Relation between Environmental Management Systems and Environmental and Financial Performance in Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Zhifeng Wu & Senjing Zhai & Jiangtao Hong & Yibin Zhang & Keren Shi, 2018. "Building Sustainable Supply Chains for Organizations Based on QFD: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Xiangmeng Huang & Shuai Yang & Xiaolan Shi, 2021. "How Corporate Social Responsibility and External Stakeholder Concerns Affect Green Supply Chain Cooperation among Manufacturers: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Adrian SOLOMON & Panagiotis KETIKIDIS & Felicia SIAVALAS, 2017. "Institutional Co-Creation Interfaces for Innovation Diffusion during Disaster Management," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(1), pages 77-95, March.
    8. A.D. Nuwan Gunarathne & Ki‐Hoon Lee & Pubudu K. Hitigala Kaluarachchilage, 2021. "Institutional pressures, environmental management strategy, and organizational performance: The role of environmental management accounting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 825-839, February.
    9. Sarah Elena Windolph & Dorli Harms & Stefan Schaltegger, 2014. "Motivations for Corporate Sustainability Management: Contrasting Survey Results and Implementation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5), pages 272-285, September.
    10. Samuel Adomako, 2020. "Environmental collaboration, sustainable innovation, and small and medium‐sized enterprise growth in sub‐Saharan Africa: Evidence from Ghana," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1609-1619, November.
    11. Kaveh Asiaei & Ruzita Jusoh & Omid Barani & Arash Asiaei, 2022. "How does green intellectual capital boost performance? The mediating role of environmental performance measurement systems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1587-1606, May.
    12. Wu, Guo-Ciang & Ding, Jyh-Hong & Chen, Ping-Shun, 2012. "The effects of GSCM drivers and institutional pressures on GSCM practices in Taiwan’s textile and apparel industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 618-636.
    13. Tiberio Daddi & Iñaki Heras‐Saizarbitoria & Luca Marrucci & Francesco Rizzi & Francesco Testa, 2021. "The effects of green supply chain management capability on the internalisation of environmental management systems and organisation performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1241-1253, July.
    14. Amna Farrukh & Sanjay Mathrani & Aymen Sajjad, 2022. "A natural resource and institutional theory‐based view of green‐lean‐six sigma drivers for environmental management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1074-1090, March.
    15. Kimitaka Nishitani & Katsuhiko Kokubu & Takehisa Kajiwara, 2016. "Does low-carbon supply chain management reduce greenhouse gas emissions more effectively than existing environmental initiatives? An empirical analysis of Japanese manufacturing firms," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 33-60, February.
    16. Vera Ferrón Vílchez & Nicole Darnall, 2016. "Two are Better Than One: The Link Between Management Systems and Business Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 221-240, May.
    17. Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Latan, Hengky & Teixeira, Adriano Alves & de Oliveira, Jorge Henrique Caldeira, 2014. "Quality management, environmental management maturity, green supply chain practices and green performance of Brazilian companies with ISO 14001 certification: Direct and indirect effects," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 39-51.
    18. Dayal S. Prasad & Rudra P. Pradhan & Kunal Gaurav & Partha P. Chatterjee & Inderpal Kaur & Saurav Dash & Sagar Nayak, 2018. "Analysing the critical success factors for implementation of sustainable supply chain management: an Indian case study," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 45(1), pages 3-25, March.
    19. Kamala kanta Muduli & Sunil Luthra & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Satyabrata Aich & Julio Cesar Ferro de Guimarães, 2020. "Environmental management and the “soft side” of organisations: Discovering the most relevant behavioural factors in green supply chains," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1647-1665, May.
    20. Wang, Haiyan & Masi, Donato & Dhamotharan, Lalitha & Day, Steven & Kumar, Ajay & Li, Tong & Singh, Gurmeet, 2022. "Unconventional path dependence: How adopting product take-back and recycling systems contributes to future eco-innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 707-717.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10372-:d:637242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.