IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9209-d615730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrial Performance: An Evolution Incorporating Ethics in the Context of Industry 4.0

Author

Listed:
  • Lamia Berrah

    (LISTIC Laboratory, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, F-74940 Annecy, France)

  • Vincent Cliville

    (LISTIC Laboratory, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, F-74940 Annecy, France)

  • Damien Trentesaux

    (LAMIH, CNRS, UMR 8201, Univ. Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, F-59313 Valenciennes, France)

  • Claude Chapel

    (NTN-SNR Company, F-74010 Annecy, France)

Abstract

This article addresses the issue of the industrial performance model and its evolution to cope with the context of Industry 4.0. With its digitalisation, intelligent/autonomous systems and wealth of data, Industry 4.0 offers opportunities that can achieve objectives better. It also presents risks and uncertainties that question the autonomy of the systems, their interaction with humans and the use of available data. The hypothesis put forward in this work is that the efficiency–effectiveness–relevance performance triangle can no longer guarantee long-term performance under these conditions and needs to be associated with an ethical dimension that allows for the risks and uncertainties relating to Industry 4.0 to be considered. Ethics is therefore considered to extend the triangle to a tetrahedron. A brief analysis of current performance management will first show the limits of the current practice in the context of Industry 4.0. The frameworks that could overcome these limits in light of new needs are then recalled and discussed, leading to the choice of ethics, whose main definitions and use in the engineering field are also introduced. The proposed (efficiency–effectiveness–relevance–ethics tetrahedron-based methodology is illustrated through a case study related to an aeronautical supplier, regarding the consequences of the implementation of a MES (Manufacturing Execution System) in terms of product traceability and operator autonomy. The discussion and prospects finally conclude this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Lamia Berrah & Vincent Cliville & Damien Trentesaux & Claude Chapel, 2021. "Industrial Performance: An Evolution Incorporating Ethics in the Context of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9209-:d:615730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9209/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9209/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ducq, Yves & Vallespir, Bruno & Doumeingts, Guy, 2001. "Coherence analysis methods for production systems by performance aggregation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 23-37, January.
    2. Gasparatos, Alexandros & El-Haram, Mohamed & Horner, Malcolm, 2009. "The argument against a reductionist approach for measuring sustainable development performance and the need for methodological pluralism," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 245-256.
    3. Neely, Andy & Mills, John & Platts, Ken & Gregory, Mike & Richards, Huw, 1996. "Performance measurement system design: Should process based approaches be adopted?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 423-431, December.
    4. Melissa Liborio Zapata & Lamia Berrah & Laurent Tabourot, 2020. "Towards the Definition of an Impact Level Factor of SME Features Over Digital Transformation," Post-Print hal-03108969, HAL.
    5. Dalenogare, Lucas Santos & Benitez, Guilherme Brittes & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Frank, Alejandro Germán, 2018. "The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 383-394.
    6. Alexandros Gasparatos & Mohamed El-Haram & Malcolm Horner, 2009. "The argument against a reductionist approach for measuring sustainable development performance and the need for methodological pluralism," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 245-256, September.
    7. Johnson, H. Thomas, 1975. "Management Accounting in an Early Integrated Industrial: E. I. duPont de Nemours Powder Company, 1903-1912," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 184-204, July.
    8. Alan Murray & Keith Skene & Kathryn Haynes, 2017. "The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 369-380, February.
    9. Bentham, Jeremy, 1781. "An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number bentham1781.
    10. Gunasekaran, A. & Ngai, E. W. T., 2004. "Information systems in supply chain integration and management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(2), pages 269-295, December.
    11. Frank, Alejandro G. & Mendes, Glauco H.S. & Ayala, Néstor F. & Ghezzi, Antonio, 2019. "Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 341-351.
    12. Jamieson, Dale, 2007. "When Utilitarians Should Be Virtue Theorists," Utilitas, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 160-183, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moad Hamod Saleh & Mohammed A. Al-Hakimi, 2022. "The Effect of Marketing Ethics as a Moderator on the Relationship Between Competitor Orientation and SMEs’ Performance in Saudi Arabia," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    2. Brigita Gajšek & Anca Draghici & Maria Elena Boatca & Alin Gaureanu & Diana Robescu, 2022. "Linking the Use of Ergonomics Methods to Workplace Social Sustainability: The Ovako Working Posture Assessment System and Rapid Entire Body Assessment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Rimalini Gadekar & Bijan Sarkar & Ashish Gadekar, 2022. "Key performance indicator based dynamic decision-making framework for sustainable Industry 4.0 implementation risks evaluation: reference to the Indian manufacturing industries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 189-249, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Figge, Frank & Hahn, Tobias & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "The If, How and Where of assessing sustainable resource use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 274-283.
    2. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan & Thurer, Matthias, 2021. "Identifying pathways to a high-performing lean automation implementation: An empirical study in the manufacturing industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    3. Gasparatos, Alexandros, 2011. "Resource consumption in Japanese agriculture and its link to food security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1101-1112, March.
    4. Mohammadreza Akbari & John L. Hopkins, 2022. "Digital technologies as enablers of supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 689-710, December.
    5. Giannetti, B.F. & Almeida, C.M.V.B. & Bonilla, S.H., 2010. "Comparing emergy accounting with well-known sustainability metrics: The case of Southern Cone Common Market, Mercosur," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3518-3526, July.
    6. Rafael, Lizarralde Dorronsoro & Jaione, Ganzarain Epelde & Cristina, López & Ibon, Serrano Lasa, 2020. "An Industry 4.0 maturity model for machine tool companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    7. Shet, Sateesh V. & Pereira, Vijay, 2021. "Proposed managerial competencies for Industry 4.0 – Implications for social sustainability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    8. Gillani, Fatima & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Sadiq Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel & Farooq, Sami, 2020. "Implementation of digital manufacturing technologies: Antecedents and consequences," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    9. Xing, Yangang & Horner, R. Malcolm W. & El-Haram, Mohamed A. & Bebbington, Jan, 2009. "A framework model for assessing sustainability impacts of urban development," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 209-224.
    10. Holden, Erling & Linnerud, Kristin & Banister, David, 2013. "Sustainable passenger transport: Back to Brundtland," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 67-77.
    11. Sehrish Atif & Shehzad Ahmed & Muhammad Wasim & Bassam Zeb & Zeeshan Pervez & Lorraine Quinn, 2021. "Towards a Conceptual Development of Industry 4.0, Servitisation, and Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, June.
    12. Purvis, Ben & Genovese, Andrea, 2023. "Better or different? A reflection on the suitability of indicator methods for a just transition to a circular economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    13. Kahle, Júlia Hofmeister & Marcon, Érico & Ghezzi, Antonio & Frank, Alejandro G., 2020. "Smart Products value creation in SMEs innovation ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Anja Jankovic-Zugic & Nenad Medic & Marko Pavlovic & Tanja Todorovic & Slavko Rakic, 2023. "Servitization 4.0 as a Trigger for Sustainable Business: Evidence from Automotive Digital Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    15. Büchi, Giacomo & Cugno, Monica & Castagnoli, Rebecca, 2020. "Smart factory performance and Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    16. Jeffrey Unerman & Jan Bebbington & Brendan O’dwyer, 2018. "Corporate reporting and accounting for externalities," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 497-522, July.
    17. Marcon, Érico & Le Dain, Marie-Anne & Frank, Alejandro G., 2022. "Designing business models for Industry 4.0 technologies provision: Changes in business dimensions through digital transformation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    18. Ewa Stawiarska & Danuta Szwajca & Mirosław Matusek & Radosław Wolniak, 2021. "Diagnosis of the Maturity Level of Implementing Industry 4.0 Solutions in Selected Functional Areas of Management of Automotive Companies in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-38, April.
    19. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Cawley Vergara, Alejandro Mac & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Sawhney, Rapinder, 2020. "Organizational learning paths based upon industry 4.0 adoption: An empirical study with Brazilian manufacturers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 284-294.
    20. Joan Torrent‐Sellens & Pilar Ficapal‐Cusí & Mihaela Enache‐Zegheru, 2023. "Boosting environmental management: The mediating role of Industry 4.0 between environmental assets and economic and social firm performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 753-768, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9209-:d:615730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.