IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p8992-d612539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping Participatory Methods in the Urban Development Process: A Systematic Review and Case-Based Evidence Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Devindi Geekiyanage

    (School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Maxwell Building, 43 Crescent, Salford M5 4WT, UK)

  • Terrence Fernando

    (School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Maxwell Building, 43 Crescent, Salford M5 4WT, UK)

  • Kaushal Keraminiyage

    (School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Maxwell Building, 43 Crescent, Salford M5 4WT, UK)

Abstract

Despite the fact that vulnerable communities are the most affected by unplanned cities, considerably less attention has been given to involving them in urban development in order to ensure equitable outcomes. In this regard, there is an urgent need for governments to introduce and enforce processes that allow citizens, including vulnerable communities, to participate in development planning and policymaking. However, at present, there is a lack of guidance for practitioners regarding the definition of a clear purpose of community engagement and the selection of appropriate participatory methods to fulfil the set purpose. This study provides a thorough account of the participatory methods that can be used to achieve various engagement goals throughout the urban development process. This structured literature review used 71 reports published from 2000 to 2020. The review revealed 34 participatory methods, wherein most of the methods are devoted to informing, consulting and involving communities, whilst only a few methods are available for interactive public participation that supports true collaboration and empowerment. The study identified 12 purposes of community engagement in urban development, and mapped the 34 participatory methods for achieving them. The analysed case studies showed that the current community engagement practices are mainly in the pre-design and briefing stages of the urban development processes, and that most projects are aiming to achieve the ‘inform’ and ‘consult’ levels of engagement, with a few aiming to achieve the ‘involve’ and ‘collaborate’ levels. This study shows that community engagement is often overlooked during the professional design, development and post-development phases. The paper presents an onion model which can be used by practitioners to choose appropriate participatory methods based on the intended urban development phase, the engagement level and the purpose of the community engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Devindi Geekiyanage & Terrence Fernando & Kaushal Keraminiyage, 2021. "Mapping Participatory Methods in the Urban Development Process: A Systematic Review and Case-Based Evidence Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8992-:d:612539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8992/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8992/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lily O. Rodríguez & Elías Cisneros & Tatiana Pequeño & Maria T. Fuentes & Yves Zinngrebe, 2018. "Building Adaptive Capacity in Changing Social-Ecological Systems: Integrating Knowledge in Communal Land-Use Planning in the Peruvian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, February.
    2. D F Andersen & J A M Vennix & G P Richardson & E A J A Rouwette, 2007. "Group model building: problem structuring, policy simulation and decision support," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(5), pages 691-694, May.
    3. Tess Pickering & John Minnery, 2012. "Scale and Public Participation: Issues in Metropolitan Regional Planning," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 249-262.
    4. Priscilla T. Apronti & Saito Osamu & Kei Otsuki & Gordana Kranjac-Berisavljevic, 2015. "Education for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR): Linking Theory with Practice in Ghana’s Basic Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-27, July.
    5. Hedelin, Beatrice & Evers, Mariele & Alkan-Olsson, Johanna & Jonsson, Anna, 2017. "Participatory modelling for sustainable development: Key issues derived from five cases of natural resource and disaster risk management," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 185-196.
    6. Krystyna A. Stave, 2002. "Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 18(2), pages 139-167, June.
    7. Peter Walters, 2018. "The limits to participation: Urban poverty and community driven development in Rajshahi City, Bangladesh," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 539-555, October.
    8. Ricciardi, Francesca & De Bernardi, Paola & Cantino, Valter, 2020. "System dynamics modeling as a circular process: The smart commons approach to impact management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Christopher M. Chini & James F. Canning & Kelsey L. Schreiber & Joshua M. Peschel & Ashlynn S. Stillwell, 2017. "The Green Experiment: Cities, Green Stormwater Infrastructure, and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Gábor Király & Péter Miskolczi, 2019. "Dynamics of participation: System dynamics and participation—An empirical review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 199-210, March.
    11. Stańczuk-Gałwiaczek, Małgorzata & Sobolewska-Mikulska, Katarzyna & Ritzema, Henk & van Loon-Steensma, Jantsje M., 2018. "Integration of water management and land consolidation in rural areas to adapt to climate change: Experiences from Poland and the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 498-511.
    12. Raymond, Christopher M. & Frantzeskaki, Niki & Kabisch, Nadja & Berry, Pam & Breil, Margaretha & Nita, Mihai Razvan & Geneletti, Davide & Calfapietra, Carlo, 2017. "A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 15-24.
    13. Greg Brown & Sean Yeong Wei Chin, 2013. "Assessing the Effectiveness of Public Participation in Neighbourhood Planning," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 563-588, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Flora Fessler & Florian Reinwald & Roswitha Weichselbaumer & Jana Wentz & Ernst Gebetsroither-Geringer, 2024. "Digitally Supported Participation Processes and Tools to Promote Gender-Responsive Public Spaces," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Anna Staniewska & Izabela Sykta & Agnieszka Ozimek & Krzysztof Barnaś & Mariusz Dudek & Magdalena Marasik & Kinga Racoń-Leja, 2023. "Framework for the Design of a Small Transport Hub as an Interdisciplinary Challenge to Implement Sustainable Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-32, July.
    3. Norhasni Zainal Abiddin & Ihsan Ro’is, 2023. "A Systematic Review on Non-Governmental Organization Role and Strategies During COVID-19 Pandemic," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 12, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ricciardi, Francesca & De Bernardi, Paola & Cantino, Valter, 2020. "System dynamics modeling as a circular process: The smart commons approach to impact management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Maruccia, Ylenia & Solazzo, Gianluca & Del Vecchio, Pasquale & Passiante, Giuseppina, 2020. "Evidence from Network Analysis application to Innovation Systems and Quintuple Helix," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Nuno Videira & Rita Lopes & Paula Antunes & Rui Santos & José Luís Casanova, 2012. "Mapping Maritime Sustainability Issues with Stakeholder Groups," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 596-619, November.
    4. Veronica Alejandra Neumann & Jochen Hack, 2019. "A Methodology of Policy Assessment at the Municipal Level: Costa Rica´s Readiness for the Implementation of Nature-Based-Solutions for Urban Stormwater Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-38, December.
    5. Datola, Giulia & Bottero, Marta & De Angelis, Elena & Romagnoli, Francesco, 2022. "Operationalising resilience: A methodological framework for assessing urban resilience through System Dynamics Model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).
    6. Carissa J Champlin & Johannes Flacke & Geert PMR Dewulf, 2022. "A game co-design method to elicit knowledge for the contextualization of spatial models," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(3), pages 1074-1090, March.
    7. Nina Tura & Lea Hannola & Mikko Pynnönen, 2017. "Agile Methods for Boosting the Commercialization Process of New Technology," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Laura Schmitt Olabisi & Amadou Sidibé, 2023. "Observations from a system dynamics modeling field school in Mali," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(1), pages 80-94, January.
    9. Tandarić, Neven & Ives, Christopher D. & Watkins, Charles, 2022. "From city in the park to “greenery in plant pots”: The influence of socialist and post-socialist planning on opportunities for cultural ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Floris C. Boogaard & Guri Venvik & Rui L. Pedroso de Lima & Ana C. Cassanti & Allard H. Roest & Antal Zuurman, 2020. "ClimateCafé: An Interdisciplinary Educational Tool for Sustainable Climate Adaptation and Lessons Learned," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Nancy Andrea Ramírez-Agudelo & Roger Porcar Anento & Miriam Villares & Elisabet Roca, 2020. "Nature-Based Solutions for Water Management in Peri-Urban Areas: Barriers and Lessons Learned from Implementation Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-36, November.
    12. Adams, Clare & Frantzeskaki, Niki & Moglia, Magnus, 2023. "Mainstreaming nature-based solutions in cities: A systematic literature review and a proposal for facilitating urban transitions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    13. Wójcik - Leń, Justyna & Postek, Paweł & Stręk, Żanna & Leń, Przemysław, 2020. "Proposed algorithm for the identification of land for consolidation with regard to spatial variability of soil quality," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Ali, Muhammad Fadzli & Akber, Md. Ali & Smith, Carl & Aziz, Ammar Abdul, 2021. "The dynamics of rubber production in Malaysia: Potential impacts, challenges and proposed interventions," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    15. Jesus R. Gastelum & Ganesh Krishnamurthy & Nemesciano Ochoa & Shane Sibbett & Margie Armstrong & Parag Kalaria, 2018. "The Use of System Dynamics Model to Enhance Integrated Resources Planning Implementation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(7), pages 2247-2260, May.
    16. Mutlu, Asli & Roy, Debraj & Filatova, Tatiana, 2023. "Capitalized value of evolving flood risks discount and nature-based solution premiums on property prices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    17. Kimberly Jones, 2023. "Community Engagement in Local Communities: Hearing the Voices of the Public," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 16(32), October.
    18. Silverio HERNANDEZ-MORENO, 2019. "International Experiences On The Implementation Of Public Policies For Urban Planning To Face Climate Change," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(2), pages 72-88, May.
    19. David C. Lane & Özge Pala & Yaman Barlas & Lambertus P. J. Nistelrooij & Etiënne A.J.A. Rouwette & Ilse M. Verstijnen & Jac A.M. Vennix, 2015. "The Eye of the Beholder: A Case Example of Changing Clients' Perspectives Through Involvement in the Model Validation Process," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 437-449, July.
    20. Rodney J. Scott & Robert Y. Cavana & Donald Cameron, 2016. "Client Perceptions of Reported Outcomes of Group Model Building in the New Zealand Public Sector," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 77-101, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8992-:d:612539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.