IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p961-d1645898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Barriers and Challenges to Green Infrastructure Implementation: Policy Insights from the Melbourne Case

Author

Listed:
  • Hing-Wah Chau

    (Institute of Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 8001, Australia
    College of Sport, Health and Engineering, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

  • Majed Abuseif

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)

  • Shiran Geng

    (Institute of Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 8001, Australia
    First Year College, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

  • Elmira Jamei

    (Institute of Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 8001, Australia
    College of Sport, Health and Engineering, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

Abstract

Urbanisation has resulted in significant environmental challenges, particularly the phenomenon of urban overheating, with a significant increase in temperatures in urban environments. To tackle the adverse impact of urban overheating, the implementation of green infrastructure (GI) has been considered particularly effective. Although there are various benefits of GI for sustainable urban management, its widespread implementation faces numerous challenges. To effectively scale up the deployment of GI, it is crucial to develop political and institutional frameworks that are both responsive and adaptable to the evolving complexities inherent in human–nature interactions. The barriers to implementation are not merely technical but also embedded in organisational norms, social practices, and governance systems, which makes them particularly difficult to overcome. This paper identifies five key categories of barriers: technical limitations, financial impediments, regulatory constraints, weak political leadership, and governance and coordination challenges. Through a targeted literature review and a detailed case study of Melbourne, the paper explores the city’s primary greening initiatives and examines how these barriers have influenced implementation. By linking specific policy responses to each barrier, this study provides new insights into the institutional and policy dynamics affecting GI adoption. The findings offer lessons for other cities seeking to better implement nature-based solutions through integrated and scalable GI strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Hing-Wah Chau & Majed Abuseif & Shiran Geng & Elmira Jamei, 2025. "Key Barriers and Challenges to Green Infrastructure Implementation: Policy Insights from the Melbourne Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:961-:d:1645898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/961/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/961/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:961-:d:1645898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.