IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p8683-d607920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expectations of Production Companies Operating in Poland towards Suppliers with Regards to Implementation of the Sustainability Concept

Author

Listed:
  • Maciej Urbaniak

    (Faculty of Management, University of Lodz, Matejki 22-26, 90-237 Łódź, Poland)

  • Blanka Tundys

    (Institute of Management, Faculty of Economics, Finance and Management, Logistics, University of Szczecin, Cukrowa 8, 71-004 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Magdalena Ankiel

    (Institute of Marketing, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Aleja Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

It can be observed that manufacturing companies (especially Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs)), by promoting the implementation of the sustainability concept among their suppliers, refer to the requirements included in international standards which constitute guidelines for the implementation of quality, environmental and safety management systems. The effective implementation of these guidelines of the standards are often subject to initial and periodic evaluation as well as self-evaluation by suppliers. It can be seen that OEMs not only require effective implementation of quality, environmental and security management systems, but also offer a supplier a development program to improve their processes and products. The aim of the article was to try to define the expectations of production companies towards their suppliers regarding the implementation of the sustainability concept. The study presents the results of empirical research conducted with the computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) technique in medium and large manufacturing companies operating in Poland. The results of these studies indicate the important role of the requirements included in international management standards as the expectations of manufacturing companies towards suppliers. The surveyed manufacturing companies focus in particular on reducing the risk of noncompliance and limiting the negative environmental impact by suppliers on the processes and products.

Suggested Citation

  • Maciej Urbaniak & Blanka Tundys & Magdalena Ankiel, 2021. "Expectations of Production Companies Operating in Poland towards Suppliers with Regards to Implementation of the Sustainability Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8683-:d:607920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8683/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8683/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ching-Ching Liu & Yue-Hwa Yu & Iddo K. Wernick & Ching-Yuan Chang, 2015. "Using the Electronic Industry Code of Conduct to Evaluate Green Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Study of Taiwan’s Computer Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Amir Hossein Azadnia & Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman & Kuan Yew Wong, 2015. "Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: an integrated multi-objective decision-making process," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 383-408, January.
    3. Mani, Venkatesh & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Delgado, Catarina, 2018. "Enhancing supply chain performance through supplier social sustainability: An emerging economy perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 259-272.
    4. Yoo, Seung Ho & Shin, Hojung & Park, Myung-Sub, 2015. "New product development and the effect of supplier involvement," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 107-120.
    5. Nikoofal, Mohammad E. & Gümüş, Mehmet, 2020. "Value of audit for supply chains with hidden action and information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 902-915.
    6. Govindan, Kannan & Shankar, Madan & Kannan, Devika, 2018. "Supplier selection based on corporate social responsibility practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 353-379.
    7. Azimifard, Arezoo & Moosavirad, Seyed Hamed & Ariafar, Shahram, 2018. "Selecting sustainable supplier countries for Iran's steel industry at three levels by using AHP and TOPSIS methods," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 30-44.
    8. Awasthi, Anjali & Govindan, Kannan & Gold, Stefan, 2018. "Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 106-117.
    9. Xiongyong Zhou & Zhiduan Xu, 2018. "An Integrated Sustainable Supplier Selection Approach Based on Hybrid Information Aggregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-49, July.
    10. Dou, Yijie & Zhu, Qinghua & Sarkis, Joseph, 2014. "Evaluating green supplier development programs with a grey-analytical network process-based methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 420-431.
    11. Cai, Shaohan & Jun, Minjoon, 2018. "A qualitative study of the internalization of ISO 9000 standards: The linkages among firms' motivations, internalization processes, and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 248-260.
    12. Govindan, Kannan & Soleimani, Hamed & Kannan, Devika, 2015. "Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 603-626.
    13. Yang, Yang & Jia, Fu & Chen, Lujie & Wang, Yichuan & Xiong, Yu, 2021. "Adoption timing of OHSAS 18001 and firm performance: An institutional theory perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    14. Quigley, John & Walls, Lesley & Demirel, Güven & MacCarthy, Bart L. & Parsa, Mahdi, 2018. "Supplier quality improvement: The value of information under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 932-947.
    15. Zhang, Chun & Henke, John W. & Viswanathan, Sridhar, 2015. "Reciprocity between buyer cost sharing and supplier technology sharing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 61-70.
    16. Saghiri, Soroosh Sam & Mirzabeiki, Vahid, 2021. "Buyer-led environmental supplier development: Can suppliers really help it?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    17. Kuo, Tsai Chi & Chen, Gary Yu-Hsin & Wang, Miao Ling & Ho, Ming Way, 2014. "Carbon footprint inventory route planning and selection of hot spot suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 125-139.
    18. Chunguang Bai & Simonov Kusi-Sarpong & Hadi Badri Ahmadi & Joseph Sarkis, 2019. "Social sustainable supplier evaluation and selection: a group decision-support approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(22), pages 7046-7067, November.
    19. Pascal Paillé & Yang Chen & Olivier Boiral & Jiafei Jin, 2014. "The Impact of Human Resource Management on Environmental Performance: An Employee-Level Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 451-466, May.
    20. Wang, Yuan & Modi, Sachin B. & Schoenherr, Tobias, 2021. "Leveraging sustainable design practices through supplier involvement in new product development: The role of the suppliers' environmental management capability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    21. Gallego-Álvarez, Prof. Isabel & Ortas, Prof. Eduardo, 2017. "Corporate environmental sustainability reporting in the context of national cultures: A quantile regression approach," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 337-353.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barbara Ocicka & Anna Baraniecka & Bartłomiej Jefmański, 2022. "Exploring Supply Chain Collaboration for Green Innovations: Evidence from the High-Tech Industry in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Zhigang Fan & Tae-Won Kang, 2023. "Linking Sustainable Supplier Selection to Firm’s Sustainable Performance: The Moderated Mediating Role of Supplier Development and Leadership for Functional Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ananna Paul & Nagesh Shukla & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Andrea Trianni, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, June.
    2. Abdullah Yıldızbaşı & Cihat Öztürk & Deniz Efendioğlu & Serol Bulkan, 2021. "Assessing the social sustainable supply chain indicators using an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods: a case study of Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4285-4320, March.
    3. Chong Li & He Huang & Ya Luo, 2022. "An Integrated Two-Dimension Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Supplier Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Esra Boz & Sinan Çizmecioğlu & Ahmet Çalık, 2022. "A Novel MDCM Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Healthcare System in the Era of Logistics 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Zhan, Yuanzhu & Chung, Leanne & Lim, Ming K. & Ye, Fei & Kumar, Ajay & Tan, Kim Hua, 2021. "The impact of sustainability on supplier selection: A behavioural study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    6. Ngoc Bao Tu Nguyen & Gu-Hong Lin & Thanh-Tuan Dang, 2021. "A Two Phase Integrated Fuzzy Decision-Making Framework for Green Supplier Selection in the Coffee Bean Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Patchara Phochanikorn & Chunqiao Tan, 2019. "A New Extension to a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection under an Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Morteza Yazdani & Dragan Pamucar & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Ali Ebadi Torkayesh, 2022. "“A multi-tier sustainable food supplier selection model under uncertainty”," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 116-145, June.
    9. Kannan Govindan & Aditi & Jyoti Dhingra Darbari & Arshia Kaul & PC Jha, 2021. "Structural model for analysis of key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturer–supplier collaboration: A grey‐decision‐making trial and evaluation laboratory‐based approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1702-1722, May.
    10. Chen Wang & Qingyan Yang & Shufen Dai, 2019. "Supplier Selection and Order Allocation under a Carbon Emission Trading Scheme: A Case Study from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Roya Ghamari & Mohammad Mahdavi-Mazdeh & Seyed Farid Ghannadpour, 2022. "Resilient and sustainable supplier selection via a new framework: a case study from the steel industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 10403-10441, August.
    12. Selçuk Perçin, 2022. "Circular supplier selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5551-5581, April.
    13. Maciej Urbaniak & Piotr Rogala & Piotr Kafel, 2023. "Expectations of manufacturing companies regarding future priorities of improvement actions taken by their suppliers," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 296-310, March.
    14. Amin Mahmoudi & Saad Ahmed Javed, 2022. "Probabilistic Approach to Multi-Stage Supplier Evaluation: Confidence Level Measurement in Ordinal Priority Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 1051-1096, October.
    15. Rui Guo & Zhenyong Wu, 2023. "Social sustainable supply chain performance assessment using hybrid fuzzy-AHP–DEMATEL–VIKOR: a case study in manufacturing enterprises," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12273-12301, November.
    16. Nihan Kabadayı, 2020. "An Integrated Fuzzy DEMATEL and Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method to Evaluate Sustainable Suppliers," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 8(2), pages 201-226, December.
    17. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Ahmad Jusoh & Habib Zare, 2017. "Application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Solve Environmental Sustainability Problems: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-65, October.
    18. Alireza Arshadi Khamseh, 2021. "A Time-Dependent Sustainable–Flexible Supplier Selection Considering Uncertainty and TODIM Method in Iranian Dairy Industries," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 113-126, June.
    19. Golmohammadi, Amirmohsen & Taghavi, Majid & Farivar, Samira & Azad, Nader, 2018. "Three strategies for engaging a buyer in supplier development efforts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1-14.
    20. Nadine Kafa & Anicia Jaegler & Joseph Sarkis, 2020. "Harnessing Corporate Sustainability Decision-Making Complexity: A Field Study of Complementary Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8683-:d:607920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.