IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8465-d603868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Technologies for Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Morato

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Spain)

  • Sonia Sanchez-Cuadrado

    (Department of Library and Information Science, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28010 Madrid, Spain)

  • Ana Iglesias

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Spain)

  • Adrián Campillo

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Spain)

  • Carmen Fernández-Panadero

    (Department of Telematic Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Spain)

Abstract

The exponential evolution of technology and the growth of the elderly population are two phenomena that will inevitably interact with increasing frequency in the future. This paper analyses scientific literature as a means of furthering progress in sustainable technology for senior living. We carried out a bibliometric analysis of papers published in this area and compiled by the Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus, examining the main participants and advances in the field from 2000 to the first quarter of 2021. The study describes some interesting research projects addressing three different aspects of older adults’ daily lives—health, daily activities and wellbeing—and policies to promote healthy aging and improve the sustainability of the healthcare system. It also looks at lines of research into transversal characteristics of technology. Our analysis showed that publications mentioning sustainability technologies for older adults have been growing progressively since the 2000s, but that the big increase in the number of research works in this area took place during the period 2016–2021. These more recent works show a tendency to study those factors that improve healthy aging, ensure the social inclusion of the elderly through technology and prolong the time in which they can live independent lives thanks to smart environments. Current research gaps in the literature are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Morato & Sonia Sanchez-Cuadrado & Ana Iglesias & Adrián Campillo & Carmen Fernández-Panadero, 2021. "Sustainable Technologies for Older Adults," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-35, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8465-:d:603868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8465/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8465/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed Ismail & Samir Abdlerazek & Ibrahim M. El-Henawy, 2020. "Development of Smart Healthcare System Based on Speech Recognition Using Support Vector Machine and Dynamic Time Warping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Wenlai Wang & Tao Pei & Jie Chen & Ci Song & Xi Wang & Hua Shu & Ting Ma & Yunyan Du, 2019. "Population Distributions of Age Groups and Their Influencing Factors Based on Mobile Phone Location Data: A Case Study of Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Philippe Mongeon & Adèle Paul-Hus, 2016. "The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 213-228, January.
    4. Pei-Jarn Chen & Szu-Yueh Yang & Chung-Sheng Wang & Muslikhin Muslikhin & Ming-Shyan Wang, 2020. "Development of a Chinese Chess Robotic System for the Elderly Using Convolutional Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Papa, Armando & Mital, Monika & Pisano, Paola & Del Giudice, Manlio, 2020. "E-health and wellbeing monitoring using smart healthcare devices: An empirical investigation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    7. Eun Ji Lee & Sung Jun Park, 2020. "A Framework of Smart-Home Service for Elderly’s Biophilic Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    8. Winger Sei-Wo Tseng & Chih-Wei Hsu, 2019. "A Smart, Caring, Interactive Chair Designed for Improving Emotional Support and Parent-Child Interactions to Promote Sustainable Relationships Between Elderly and Other Family Members," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-32, February.
    9. Xingquan Cai & Yufeng Gao & Mengxuan Li & Wei Song, 2016. "Infrared Human Posture Recognition Method for Monitoring in Smart Homes Based on Hidden Markov Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinyue Zhang & Xiaolu Gao & Danxian Wu & Zening Xu & Hongjie Wang, 2021. "The Role of Big Data in Aging and Older People’s Health Research: A Systematic Review and Ecological Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Maria José Sá & Sandro Serpa & Carlos Miguel Ferreira, 2022. "Citizen Science in the Promotion of Sustainability: The Importance of Smart Education for Smart Societies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Olga Tena-Bernal & Marta Sánchez-Peña & Alba Gómez-Cabello & Carlos Salavera & Pablo Usán & Estela Calatayud, 2021. "Cognitive and Functional Differences in Aging with and without Intellectual Disabilities: Observational Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Sylwia Łukasik & Sławomir Tobis & Julia Suwalska & Dorota Łojko & Maria Napierała & Marek Proch & Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska & Aleksandra Suwalska, 2021. "The Role of Socially Assistive Robots in the Care of Older People: To Assist in Cognitive Training, to Remind or to Accompany?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Maksym Gaiduk & Ralf Seepold & Natividad Martínez Madrid & Juan Antonio Ortega, 2021. "Digital Health and Care Study on Elderly Monitoring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, December.
    6. P. V. Thayyib & Rajesh Mamilla & Mohsin Khan & Humaira Fatima & Mohd Asim & Imran Anwar & M. K. Shamsudheen & Mohd Asif Khan, 2023. "State-of-the-Art of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Analytics Reviews in Five Different Domains: A Bibliometric Summary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-38, February.
    7. Valentina Caiola & Elina Moreira Kares & Margherita Pillan & Davide Spallazzo & Aarni Tuomi, 2023. "Remote Cultural Events: Investigating the Usefulness of Live Streaming for Creating Cultural and Social Engagement in Communities of Older Adults," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon Zaby, 2019. "Science Mapping of the Global Knowledge Base on Microfinance: Influential Authors and Documents, 1989–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Jaspreet Kaur & Madhu Vij & Ajay Kumar Chauhan, 2023. "Signals influencing corporate credit ratings—a systematic literature review," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 50(1), pages 91-114, March.
    3. Turgut Karakose & Ibrahim Kocabas & Ramazan Yirci & Stamatios Papadakis & Tuncay Yavuz Ozdemir & Murat Demirkol, 2022. "The Development and Evolution of Digital Leadership: A Bibliometric Mapping Approach-Based Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Pattarin Sanguankaew & Vichita Vathanophas Ractham, 2019. "Bibliometric Review of Research on Knowledge Management and Sustainability, 1994–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Philip Hallinger & Ray Wang, 2020. "The Evolution of Simulation-Based Learning Across the Disciplines, 1965–2018: A Science Map of the Literature," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(1), pages 9-32, February.
    6. Astrid Kainzbauer & Parisa Rungruang & Philip Hallinger, 2021. "How Does Research on Sustainable Human Resource Management Contribute to Corporate Sustainability: A Document Co-Citation Analysis, 1982–2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Christopher Hansen & Holger Steinmetz & Jörn Block, 2022. "How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Huixian Shen & Ivan Ka Wai Lai, 2022. "Souvenirs: A Systematic Literature Review (1981–2020) and Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    9. Yi Lu & Gayani Karunasena & Chunlu Liu, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review of Non-Compliance with Low-Carbon Building Regulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Emilio Abad-Segura & Alfonso Infante-Moro & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Eloy López-Meneses, 2021. "Blockchain Technology for Secure Accounting Management: Research Trends Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Prattana Punnakitikashem & Philip Hallinger, 2019. "Bibliometric Review of the Knowledge Base on Healthcare Management for Sustainability, 1994–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Andrea Caputo & Mariya Kargina, 2022. "A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 82-88, March.
    13. Andreas Ch. Hadjichambis & Demetra Paraskeva-Hadjichambi & Eleni Sinakou & Anastasia Adamou & Yiannis Georgiou, 2022. "Green Cities for Environmental Citizenship: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research from 31 Green Cities of the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-30, December.
    14. Bao Hoang Nguyen & Robin C. Sickles & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2021. "What do we know from the vast literature on efficiency and productivity in healthcare? A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis," CEPA Working Papers Series WP092021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    15. Suparak Suriyankietkaew & Phallapa Petison, 2019. "A Retrospective and Foresight: Bibliometric Review of International Research on Strategic Management for Sustainability, 1991–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    16. Celeste Vong & Paulo Rita & Nuno António, 2021. "Health-Related Crises in Tourism Destination Management: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-28, December.
    17. Eduardo Augusto Machado & Luiz Felipe Scavarda & Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Caiado & Renan Silva Santos, 2024. "Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Integration in the Supply Chains of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises through People, Process, and Technology within the Triple Bottom Line Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, January.
    18. Shubham Singhania & Jagvinder Singh & Deepti Aggrawal, 2023. "Gender diversity on board and corporate sustainability: a quantitative review based on bibliometric mapping," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 267-286, February.
    19. Philip Hallinger & Vien-Thong Nguyen, 2020. "Mapping the Landscape and Structure of Research on Education for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Yue Guiling & Siti Aisyah Panatik & Mohammad Saipol Mohd Sukor & Noraini Rusbadrol & Li Cunlin, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Organizational Citizenship Behavior From 2000 to 2019," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8465-:d:603868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.