IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7813-d593317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Residents’ Cognition and Behavior Related to Eco-Environmental Risks from the Development of Large Coal Power Plants: A Case Study in Xilinhot, Inner Mongolia

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Ma

    (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yan Ma

    (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhiguo Cao

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining, China Energy Investment Corporation, Beijing 100011, China)

  • Shuyi Li

    (Guorui Ward Low Carbon Economy and Technology Center, Beijing 100031, China)

  • Bowen Lv

    (Policy Research Center for Environment and Economy, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing 100011, China)

  • Ziyuan Ruan

    (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Lina Wang

    (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Hong Yu

    (State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Simulation and Control of Groundwater Pollution, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Science, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Zhaohua Lu

    (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

The development of large coal power plants is often accompanied by environmental pollution, thereby influencing the lives of the surrounding residents, resulting in a “not-in-my-backyard” effect and associated social injustice. To mitigate these influences, we conducted field research and questionnaire surveys with individuals living in areas around the Xilinhot coal power plant to explore their cognitive and behavioral psychological changes in response to the environmental risks of the coal power plant and the factors influencing such changes. A “cognition-perception-behavior” model was constructed for residents coping with the ecological environment influenced by the development of the coal power plant. Cognition of eco-environmental risks had a significant effect on the perception of eco-environmental risks which, in turn, significantly promoted the adoption of adaptive behaviors. Residents had a strong cognition and perception of eco-environmental risks but an extremely low likelihood of adopting relevant adaptive behaviors. Thus, affective responses can increase the residents’ cognition and perception of eco-environmental risks, and the communication of risk information can help them evaluate eco-environmental risks rationally.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Ma & Yan Ma & Zhiguo Cao & Shuyi Li & Bowen Lv & Ziyuan Ruan & Lina Wang & Hong Yu & Zhaohua Lu, 2021. "Residents’ Cognition and Behavior Related to Eco-Environmental Risks from the Development of Large Coal Power Plants: A Case Study in Xilinhot, Inner Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7813-:d:593317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7813/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7813/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Chunqin & Liu, Yong & Lu, Weite & Xiao, Guangnian, 2019. "Evaluating passenger satisfaction index based on PLS-SEM model: Evidence from Chinese public transport service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 149-164.
    2. Bayard, Budry & Jolly, Curtis, 2007. "Environmental behavior structure and socio-economic conditions of hillside farmers: A multiple-group structural equation modeling approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(3-4), pages 433-440, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abadi, Bijan & Yadollahi, Arash & Bybordi, Ahmad & Rahmati, Mehdi, 2020. "The discrimination of adopters and non-adopters of conservation agricultural initiatives in northwest Iran: Attitudinal, soil testing, and topographical modules," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Xu-Hui Li & Lin Huang & Qiang Li & Hu-Chen Liu, 2020. "Passenger Satisfaction Evaluation of Public Transportation Using Pythagorean Fuzzy MULTIMOORA Method under Large Group Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Aghajanzadeh, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2022. "Has COVID-19 changed our loyalty towards public transport? Understanding the moderating role of the pandemic in the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 80-103.
    4. Maria & Irham & Slamet Hartono & Lestari Rahayu Waluyati, 2022. "The effect of environmental awareness on motivation in adopting farming conservation techniques in the various agro-ecological zones: a case study in critical land of Java Island, Indonesia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1878-1896, February.
    5. Tuochen Li & Siran Wang, 2021. "How to Improve the Public Trust of the Intelligent Aging Community: An Empirical Study Based on the ACSI Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. de Oña, Juan, 2020. "The role of involvement with public transport in the relationship between service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 296-318.
    7. Hasanburak Yucel & Murat Ergün & Gozde Bakioglu, 2025. "Will Conventional Public Transport Users Adopt Autonomous Public Transport? A Model Integrating UTAUT Model and Satisfaction–Loyalty Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-31, October.
    8. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Abrari Vajari, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2020. "Importance – Performance Analysis (IPA) of bus service attributes: A case study in a developing country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 129-150.
    9. Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi Ibrahim & Muhamad Nazri Borhan & Nur Izzi Md. Yusoff & Amiruddin Ismail & Muhamad Razuhanafi Mat Yazid & Nor Aznirahani Mhd Yunin & Sotaro Yukawa, 2021. "Gender and Age Do Matter: Exploring the Effect of Passengers’ Gender and Age on the Perception of Light Rail Transit Service Quality in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Yaoyang Zhao & Scott Cloutier & Hongqing Li, 2020. "Farmers’ Economic Status and Satisfaction with Homestead Withdrawal Policy: Expectation and Perceived Value," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Margarita Bagamanova & Miguel Mujica Mota & Vittorio Di Vito, 2022. "Exploring the Efficiency of Future Multimodal Networks: A Door-to-Door Case in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Raphael Nawrotzki & Gilvan Guedes & Roberto Carmo, 2014. "Affluence and Objective Environmental Conditions: Evidence of Differences in Environmental Concern in Metropolitan Brazil," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(2), pages 173-173, February.
    13. Singh, Harpreet & Kathuria, Ankit, 2023. "Heterogeneity in passenger satisfaction of bus rapid transit system among age and gender groups: A PLS-SEM Multi-group analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 27-41.
    14. Ding, Hongxiang & Zhang, Junyi, 2021. "Dynamic associations between temporal behavior changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and subjective assessments of policymaking: A case study in Japan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 58-70.
    15. Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi Ibrahim & Muhamad Nazri Borhan & Mohd Haniff Osman & Faridah Hanim Khairuddin & Nur Mustakiza Zakaria, 2022. "An Empirical Study of Passengers’ Perceived Satisfaction with Monorail Service Quality: Case of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Mandhani, Jyoti & Nayak, Jogendra Kumar & Parida, Manoranjan, 2020. "Interrelationships among service quality factors of Metro Rail Transit System: An integrated Bayesian networks and PLS-SEM approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 320-336.
    17. Ni, Anning & Zhang, Chunqin & Hu, Yuting & Lu, Weite & Li, Hongwei, 2020. "Influence mechanism of the corporate image on passenger satisfaction with public transport in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 54-65.
    18. Shaghayegh Rahnama & Adriana Cortez & Andres Monzon, 2024. "Navigating Passenger Satisfaction: A Structural Equation Modeling–Artificial Neural Network Approach to Intercity Bus Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-33, May.
    19. Munoz, Claudia & Laniado, Henry, 2021. "Airline choice model for international round-trip flights: The role of travelers’ satisfaction and personality traits," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    20. Toma, Luiza & Sutherland, Lee-Ann & Barnes, Andrew Peter & Renwick, Alan W. & McCrum, Gillian & Blackstock, Kirsty, 2011. "Policy Implications of a Behavioural Economics Analysis of Land Use Determinants in Rural Scotland," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 116086, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7813-:d:593317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.