IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7671-d591213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Trust and Risk in Citizens’ E-Government Services Adoption: A Perspective of the Extended UTAUT Model

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjuan Li

    (School of Public Management and Public Policy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Centre for Crisis Management Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Centre for Social Risk Assessment in China, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

This research particularly aims to investigate how trust and perceived risk influence citizens’ e-government adoption. The findings of the study reveal that citizens’ trust of the government (TOG) and trust of the internet (TOI) positively affect citizens’ e-government adoption (EGA); perceived risk (PR) is negatively associated with citizens’ EGA. Interestingly, this study also demonstrates the negative moderating effect of PR on the relationship between TOG and EGA, TOI and EGA. The results also indicate that performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), and facilitation conditions (FC) influence citizens’ EGA positively. Lastly, implications for practice and research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjuan Li, 2021. "The Role of Trust and Risk in Citizens’ E-Government Services Adoption: A Perspective of the Extended UTAUT Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7671-:d:591213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7671/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7671/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seunghwan Myeong & Yongmin Kwon & Hyungjun Seo, 2014. "Sustainable E-Governance: The Relationship among Trust, Digital Divide, and E-Government," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Lemuria Carter & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2008. "E-government adoption: A cultural comparison," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 473-482, September.
    3. Wannasiri Bhuasiri & Hangjung Zo & Hwansoo Lee & Andrew P. Ciganek, 2016. "User Acceptance of e-government Services: Examining an e-tax Filing and Payment System in Thailand," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 672-695, October.
    4. Andrei Vladimirovich Glotko & Aleksandra Grigorievna Polyakova & Aleksandra Grigorievna Polyakova & Mariya Yurievna Kuznetsova & Kseniya E. Kovalenko & Rustem Adamovich Shichiyakh & Margarita V. Melni, 2020. "Main trends of government regulation of sectoral digitalization," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 2181-2195, March.
    5. Mohammad Razif & Bobby Ardiansyah Miraja & Satria Fadil Persada & Reny Nadlifatin & Prawira Fajarindra Belgiawan & Anak Agung Ngurah Perwira Redi & Shu-Chiang Lin, 2020. "Investigating the role of environmental concern and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology on working from home technologies adoption during COVID-19," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(1), pages 795-808, September.
    6. Jacek Woźniak & Alexandra Zbuchea, 2021. "Give or buy contexts and internet experience as a factor differentiating of readiness to provide different types of personal data in m-commerce," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 53-67, June.
    7. Tomas PlÄ—ta & Manuela TvaronaviÄ ienÄ— & Manuela TvaronaviÄ ienÄ— & Silvia Della Casa & Silvia Della Casa & Konstantin Agafonov, 2020. "Cyber-attacks to critical energy infrastructure and management issues: overview of selected cases," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(3), pages 703-715, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodrigo Andrés Crisóstomo Zúñiga & Juan Pablo Núñez Morales & Nicolas A. Nunez, 2024. "Cryptocurrencies as Catalysts for Financial Inclusion in Latin America," The Anahuac Journal, Business and Economics School. Anahuac University (Mexico)., vol. 24(2), pages 1-32, December.
    2. Galina Ilieva & Tania Yankova & Margarita Ruseva & Yulia Dzhabarova & Veselina Zhekova & Stanislava Klisarova-Belcheva & Tanya Mollova & Angel Dimitrov, 2024. "Factors Influencing User Perception and Adoption of E-Government Services," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-30, March.
    3. Issam AlHadid & Evon Abu-Taieh & Rami S. Alkhawaldeh & Sufian Khwaldeh & Ra’ed Masa’deh & Khalid Kaabneh & Ala’Aldin Alrowwad, 2022. "Predictors for E-Government Adoption of SANAD App Services Integrating UTAUT, TPB, TAM, Trust, and Perceived Risk," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Lavaei Adaryani, Rasool & Palouj, Mojtaba & Karbasioun, Mostafa & Asadi, Ali & Gholami, Hesamedin & Kianirad, Ali & Joodi Damirchi, Milad, 2024. "Antecedents of blockchain adoption in the poultry supply chain: An extended UTAUT model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Muhammad Hasibul Hasan & Syed Zulkarnain Bin Syed Idrus & Norshahrian Binti Nordin, 2024. "E-Government Adoption Intention among Bangladeshi Citizens a Conceptual Model," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(12), pages 457-467, December.
    6. Adeyeye, Kemi, 2024. "Controlling the ‘elephant in the room’: A new protocol for sharing data from home performance monitoring systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Ji-Hye Kim & Eungoo Kang, 2023. "An Empirical Research: Incorporation of User Innovativeness into TAM and UTAUT in Adopting a Golf App," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenjuan Li & Lan Xue, 2021. "Analyzing the Critical Factors Influencing Post-Use Trust and Its Impact on Citizens’ Continuous-Use Intention of E-Government: Evidence from Chinese Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Elena Vechkinzova & Yelena Petrenko & Yana S. Matkovskaya & Gaukhar Koshebayeva, 2021. "The Dilemma of Long-Term Development of the Electric Power Industry in Kazakhstan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Garín-Muñoz, Teresa & López, Rafael & Pérez-Amaral, Teodosio & Herguera, Iñigo & Valarezo, Angel, 2019. "Models for individual adoption of eCommerce, eBanking and eGovernment in Spain," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 100-111.
    4. Kumju Hwang & Hyemi Um, 2021. "Social Controls and Bonds of Public Information Consumer on Sustainable Utilization and Provision for Computing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Yongrok Choi & Ning Zhang, 2015. "Introduction to the Special Issue on “the Sustainable Asia Conference 2014”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-8, February.
    6. Joachim P. Hasebrook & Leonie Michalak & Anna Wessels & Sabine Koenig & Stefan Spierling & Stefan Kirmsse, 2022. "Green Behavior: Factors Influencing Behavioral Intention and Actual Environmental Behavior of Employees in the Financial Service Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-35, August.
    7. repec:ddj:parsro:y:2013:i:2:p:53-61 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Huiying Zhang & Zijian Zhu, 2024. "Mobile Government Service Promotion Strategies: Exploring Sustainable Development Pathways Based on Provincial Government Practices in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Wadim Strielkowski & Irina Firsova & Inna Lukashenko & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2021. "Effective Management of Energy Consumption during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of ICT Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Lyulyov, Oleksii & Pimonenko, Tetyana & Saura, Jose Ramon & Barbosa, Belem, 2024. "How do e-governance and e-business drive sustainable development goals?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Syed Sardar Muhammad & Bidit Lal Dey & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2018. "Analysis of Factors that Influence Customers’ Willingness to Leave Big Data Digital Footprints on Social Media: A Systematic Review of Literature," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 559-576, June.
    12. Pynnönen, Sari & Haltia, Emmi & Hujala, Teppo, 2021. "Digital forest information platform as service innovation: Finnish Metsaan.fi service use, users and utilisation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Gijón, Covadonga & Fernández-Bonilla, Fernando & Ruíz-Rúa, Aurora, 2025. "Different approaches to Spanish e-government: From use to impact," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    14. Yueping Zheng & Liang Ma, 2022. "How Citizen Demand Affects the Process of M-Government Adoption: An Empirical Study in China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1407-1433, December.
    15. Małgorzata Dzimińska & Justyna Fijałkowska & Łukasz Sułkowski, 2018. "Trust-Based Quality Culture Conceptual Model for Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Srinuan, Chalita & Bohlin, Erik, 2011. "Understanding the digital divide: A literature survey and ways forward," 22nd European Regional ITS Conference, Budapest 2011: Innovative ICT Applications - Emerging Regulatory, Economic and Policy Issues 52191, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    17. T. Santhanamery & T. Ramayah, 2015. "Understanding the Effect of Demographic and Personality Traits on the E-Filing Continuance Usage Intention in Malaysia," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Yue Guo & Lei Zhou & Jidong Chen, 2023. "The persuasive role of the past: Policy feedback and citizens' acceptance of information communication technologies during the COVID‐19 pandemic in China," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(4), pages 573-588, July.
    19. Jana Stofkova & Adela Poliakova & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Peter Malega & Matej Krejnus & Vladimira Binasova & Naqibullah Daneshjo, 2022. "Digital Skills as a Significant Factor of Human Resources Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Michael J. Magro, 2012. "A Review of Social Media Use in E-Government," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-14, April.
    21. Igor Denisov & Yelena Petrenko & Irina Koretskaya & Stanislav Benčič, 2021. "The Gameover in Universities Education Management during the Pandemic COVID-19: Challenges to Sustainable Development in a Digitalized Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7671-:d:591213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.