IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6734-d574873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural Relationship of Key Factors for Student Satisfaction and Achievement in Asynchronous Online Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Sohee Kim

    (Center for Teaching and Learning, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea)

  • Dae-Jin Kim

    (Center for Teaching and Learning, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea)

Abstract

This study examines the structural relationship among key factors influencing student satisfaction and achievement in online learning. A structural model was developed by considering course structure, student–student interaction, instructor presence, student engagement, student satisfaction and achievement as key factors. In order to verify the effectiveness of the developed structural model, we utilized the survey data collected from a total of 250 students enrolled in two asynchronous online courses offered at Kyung Hee University in Korea in the fall semester of 2020. Then, the collected survey data were analyzed using the structural equation model. The verification of the statistical analysis results indicates that the course structure has a more significant effect on the student satisfaction and achievement than the other key factors such as the student–student interaction, instructor presence and student engagement. It also reveals that the student engagement affects only the student satisfaction and has a mediated effect between student–student interaction and student satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Sohee Kim & Dae-Jin Kim, 2021. "Structural Relationship of Key Factors for Student Satisfaction and Achievement in Asynchronous Online Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6734-:d:574873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6734/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6734/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeongju Lee & Hae-Deok Song & Ah Jeong Hong, 2019. "Exploring Factors, and Indicators for Measuring Students’ Sustainable Engagement in e-Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiying Han & Xiaohui Geng & Qinxiang Wang, 2021. "Sustainable Development of University EFL Learners’ Engagement, Satisfaction, and Self-Efficacy in Online Learning Environments: Chinese Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Giero Krissianne Frances Concepcion & Francheska Mikaela B. Navata & Raphael Andrei V. Robles & Isaiash Jeremy T. Tomagos & Michael Nayat Young & John Franci, 2021. "Determining Factors Affecting Acceptance of E-Learning Platforms during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Integrating Extended Technology Acceptance Model and DeLone & McLean IS Success Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Fenglong Yu & Qian Chen & Bing Hou, 2021. "Understanding the Impacts of Chinese Undergraduate Tourism Students’ Professional Identity on Learning Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Sohee Kim & Sunghee Cho & Joo Yeun Kim & Dae-Jin Kim, 2023. "Statistical Assessment on Student Engagement in Asynchronous Online Learning Using the k -Means Clustering Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William Villegas-Ch & Xavier Palacios-Pacheco & Sergio Luján-Mora, 2019. "Application of a Smart City Model to a Traditional University Campus with a Big Data Architecture: A Sustainable Smart Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Bumho Lee & Jinwoo Kim, 2023. "Managing Social Presence in Collaborative Learning with Agent Facilitation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Tidarat Luangrungruang & Urachart Kokaew, 2022. "E-Learning Model to Identify the Learning Styles of Hearing-Impaired Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Annchen Mielmann, 2021. "Being Innovative in Running an Online Food Research Project in Consumer Sciences during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Asheena Singh-Pillay, 2023. "Pre-Service Teachers’ Experience of Learning about Sustainability in Technology Education in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Younyoung Choi & Jigeun Kim, 2021. "Learning Analytics for Diagnosing Cognitive Load in E-Learning Using Bayesian Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Dianne Forbes & Dilani Gedera & Maggie Hartnett & Ashwini Datt & Cheryl Brown, 2023. "Sustainable Strategies for Teaching and Learning Online," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Kuo-Kuang Fan & Xue-Hui Li & Meng-Jia Lu, 2020. "Sustainability Research on Promoting the Inheritance of Lacquer Art Based on the E-learning Mode—Case Study of the Popularization of Lacquer Art Education in Primary Schools in Guangzhou Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Alzbeta Kucharcikova & Martin Miciak & Eva Malichova & Maria Durisova & Emese Tokarcikova, 2019. "The Motivation of Students at Universities as a Prerequisite of the Education’s Sustainability within the Business Value Generation Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-25, October.
    10. Eduard Edelhauser & Lucian Lupu-Dima, 2020. "Is Romania Prepared for eLearning during the COVID-19 Pandemic?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-30, July.
    11. Prakash Singh & Ibrahim Alhassan & Nasser Binsaif & Thamer Alhussain, 2023. "Standard Measuring of E-Learning to Assess the Quality Level of E-Learning Outcomes: Saudi Electronic University Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-28, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6734-:d:574873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.