IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6181-d566034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BIM for Smart Hospital Management during COVID-19 Using MCDM

Author

Listed:
  • Chih-Lung Lin

    (Department of Neurosurgery, Asia University Hospital, Taichung 413, Taiwan)

  • James K. C. Chen

    (Department of Business Administration, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan)

  • Han-Hsi Ho

    (Department of Business Administration, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan)

Abstract

In context of the recent COVID-19 pandemic, smart hospitals’ contributions to pre-medical, remote diagnosis, and social distancing has been further vetted. Smart hospital management evolves with new technology and knowledge management, which needs an evaluation system to prioritize its associated criteria and sub-criteria. The global effect of the COVID-19 pandemic further necessitates a comprehensive research of smart hospital management. This paper will utilize Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) within Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) to establish a smart hospital evaluation system with evaluation criteria and sub-criteria, which were then further prioritized and mapped to BIM-related alternatives to inform asset information management (AIM) practices. This context of this study included the expert opinions of six professionals in the smart hospital field and collected 113 responses from hospital-related personnel. The results indicated that functionalities connected to end users are critical, in particular IoT’s Network Core Functionalities, AI’s Deep Learning and CPS’s Special Network Technologies. Furthermore, BIM’s capability to contribute to the lifecycle management of assets can relate and contribute to the asset-intensive physical criteria of smart hospitals, in particular IoT, service technology innovations and their sub-criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Chih-Lung Lin & James K. C. Chen & Han-Hsi Ho, 2021. "BIM for Smart Hospital Management during COVID-19 Using MCDM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6181-:d:566034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6181/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6181/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jason Papathanasiou & Nikolaos Ploskas, 2018. "Multiple Criteria Decision Aid," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, number 978-3-319-91648-4, June.
    2. Barbara Aquilani & Michela Piccarozzi & Tindara Abbate & Anna Codini, 2020. "The Role of Open Innovation and Value Co-creation in the Challenging Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0: Toward a Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thien Khai Tran & Hoa Dinh & Hien Nguyen & Dac-Nhuong Le & Dong-Ky Nguyen & An C. Tran & Viet Nguyen-Hoang & Ha Nguyen Thi Thu & Dinh Hung & Suong Tieu & Canh Khuu & Tuan A. Nguyen, 2021. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on College Students: An Online Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Cunwei Yang & Weiqing Wang & Fengying Li & Degang Yang, 2022. "One-Size-Fits-All Policies Are Unacceptable: A Sustainable Management and Decision-Making Model for Schools in the Post-COVID-19 Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Esra Boz & Sinan Çizmecioğlu & Ahmet Çalık, 2022. "A Novel MDCM Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Healthcare System in the Era of Logistics 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Merello, Paloma & Barberá, Antonio & la Poza, Elena De, 2022. "Is the sustainability profile of FinTech companies a key driver of their value?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Guilherme F. Frederico, 2021. "From Supply Chain 4.0 to Supply Chain 5.0: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review and Research Directions," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Joana Costa & Inês Amorim & João Reis & Nuno Melão, 2023. "User communities: from nice-to-have to must-have," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, December.
    4. Amin Salehpour Jam & Jamal Mosaffaie & Faramarz Sarfaraz & Samad Shadfar & Rouhangiz Akhtari, 2021. "GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 1025-1046, August.
    5. Chenguang Li & Zhenjun Qiu & Tao Fu, 2021. "The Role of Policy Perceptions and Entrepreneurs’ Preferences in Firms’ Response to Industry 4.0: The Case of Chinese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Rabin K. Jana & Dinesh K. Sharma & Peeyush Mehta, 2022. "A probabilistic fuzzy goal programming model for managing the supply of emergency relief materials," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 149-172, December.
    7. Chia-Liang Lin & Jwu-Jenq Chen & Yu-Yu Ma, 2023. "Ranking of Service Quality Solution for Blended Design Teaching Using Fuzzy ANP and TOPSIS in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, March.
    8. Granacher, Julia & Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Castro-Amoedo, Rafael & Maréchal, François, 2022. "Overcoming decision paralysis—A digital twin for decision making in energy system design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    9. Wagner Silva Costa & Plácido R. Pinheiro & Nádia M. dos Santos & Lucídio dos A. F. Cabral, 2023. "Aligning the Goals Hybrid Model for the Diagnosis of Mental Health Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-31, March.
    10. Tzu-Fei Hsiung & Yueh-Hsiu Cheng & Zi-Xun Han, 2021. "Sustainable Partnership: Operational Condition Analysis for Brand Value Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Ayough, Ashkan & Boshruei, Setareh & Khorshidvand, Behrooz, 2022. "A new interactive method based on multi-criteria preference degree functions for solar power plant site selection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1165-1173.
    12. Dimitris Mourtzis & John Angelopoulos & Nikos Panopoulos, 2022. "A Literature Review of the Challenges and Opportunities of the Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-29, August.
    13. Maria Morfoulaki & Jason Papathanasiou, 2021. "Use of PROMETHEE MCDA Method for Ranking Alternative Measures of Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Carolina Narvaez Rojas & Gustavo Adolfo Alomia Peñafiel & Diego Fernando Loaiza Buitrago & Carlos Andrés Tavera Romero, 2021. "Society 5.0: A Japanese Concept for a Superintelligent Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Andrii Shekhovtsov & Volodymyr Kozlov & Viktor Nosov & Wojciech Sałabun, 2020. "Efficiency of Methods for Determining the Relevance of Criteria in Sustainable Transport Problems: A Comparative Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Chaplygin, V. & Moroz, V., 2022. "Decision making on the technology transfer in regional innovation cluster under uncertainty and risk," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 53(1), pages 121-142.
    17. Samuel Kofi Otchere & Hongyun Tian & Cephas Paa Kwasi Coffie & Frank Hammond, 2021. "Heterogeneous Analysis of the Nexus between Big Data Analytics and Value Co-Creation: Insight from Selected Service Businesses in Ghana," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 25(1), pages 533-543, November.
    18. Anna Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz & Iwona Zdonek, 2021. "How Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0 Ideas Shape the Open Data Performance Expectancy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    19. Lorena D'Agostino, 2021. "A project-level approach to green open innovation," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 12713393, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    20. Lombardi, Silvia & Santini, Erica & Vecciolini, Claudia, 2022. "Drivers of territorial servitization: An empirical analysis of manufacturing productivity in local value chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6181-:d:566034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.