IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5358-d552319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regenerating Sponge City to Sponge Watershed through an Innovative Framework for Urban Water Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Wang

    (Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Urban Water Cycle and Water Environment Safety, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China
    Shenzhen Water Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518001, China)

  • Fei Xue

    (Shenzhen Water Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518001, China)

  • Ruiying Jing

    (Shenzhen Water Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518001, China)

  • Qiaohui Lu

    (Shenzhen Water Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518001, China)

  • Yilong Huang

    (Shenzhen Water Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518001, China)

  • Xiang Sun

    (Shenzhen Water Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518001, China)

  • Wenbo Zhu

    (Shenzhen Water Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518001, China)

Abstract

In recent years, cities universal are advocating ‘resilience’ in terms of water-related challenges. Accompanied by the development of sponge city construction, several emerging stormwater management practices are prevailing worldwide. This paper proposes a regenerative argument for sponge city construction from the urban scale towards the watershed scale by strengthening the urban water resilience and sustainability. An innovative framework is established to address urban water issues and human livability via 20 conventional and advanced indicators and the interrelations between the modules of water resilience, water resource, water treatment, water ecology, waterscape, and water management. Six representative cities from the sponge city construction pilot in South China have been selected, and the compatibility and divergence between their guidelines and the sponge watershed framework are revealed through pair analyses and parameter calculation. The diverse perspectives behind the scores have been discussed carefully, and the successful experiences of excellent cities are systematically summarized and promoted. The analyses and findings in this research have significant methodological implications for shifting the sponge city practice towards linking urban development with watershed ecological conservation. The proposed framework and strategies provide a reference for an integrated solution of watershed health and wellbeing in the next generation sponge city practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Wang & Fei Xue & Ruiying Jing & Qiaohui Lu & Yilong Huang & Xiang Sun & Wenbo Zhu, 2021. "Regenerating Sponge City to Sponge Watershed through an Innovative Framework for Urban Water Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-36, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5358-:d:552319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5358/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5358/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiao Liang, 2018. "Integrated Economic and Financial Analysis of China’s Sponge City Program for Water-resilient Urban Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Xuezhou Fan & Toru Matsumoto, 2019. "GIS-Based Social Cost–Benefit Analysis on Integrated Urban Water Management in China: A Case Study of Sponge City in Harbin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Mao, Xuhui & Jia, Haifeng & Yu, Shaw L., 2017. "Assessing the ecological benefits of aggregate LID-BMPs through modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 353(C), pages 139-149.
    4. Frumkin, H., 2003. "Healthy Places: Exploring the Evidence," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1451-1456.
    5. Nien-Sheng Hsu & Chung-Hsiang Chiang & Wen-Ming Cheng & Chih-Chiang Wei, 2012. "Study on the Trade-Off between Ecological Base Flow and Optimized Water Supply," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(11), pages 3095-3112, September.
    6. Xiao Liang & Yuqing Liang & Chong Chen & Meine Pieter van Dijk, 2020. "Implementing Water Policies in China: A Policy Cycle Analysis of the Sponge City Program Using Two Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-11, June.
    7. Maragno, Denis & Gaglio, Mattias & Robbi, Martina & Appiotti, Federica & Fano, Elisa Anna & Gissi, Elena, 2018. "Fine-scale analysis of urban flooding reduction from green infrastructure: An ecosystem services approach for the management of water flows," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 386(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Chaohui Zhang & Mingyu He & Yishan Zhang, 2019. "Urban Sustainable Development Based on the Framework of Sponge City: 71 Case Studies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Tomas Germundsson & Peter Howard & Kenneth Olwig, 2011. "Introduction: Reassessing Landscape Drivers and the Globalist Environmental Agenda," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 395-399.
    10. He, Bao-Jie & Zhu, Jin & Zhao, Dong-Xue & Gou, Zhong-Hua & Qi, Jin-Da & Wang, Junsong, 2019. "Co-benefits approach: Opportunities for implementing sponge city and urban heat island mitigation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 147-157.
    11. Boyd, James & Banzhaf, Spencer, 2007. "What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2-3), pages 616-626, August.
    12. Janet Hooke & Hongyan Chen, 2016. "Evidence of increase in woody vegetation in a river corridor, Northwest England, 1984--2007," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 484-491, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Keyu Luo & Zhenyu Wang & Wei Sha & Jiansheng Wu & Hongliang Wang & Qingliang Zhu, 2021. "Integrating Sponge City Concept and Neural Network into Land Suitability Assessment: Evidence from a Satellite Town of Shenzhen Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heng Zhang & Qian Chang & Sui Li & Jiandong Huang, 2022. "Determining the Efficiency of the Sponge City Construction Pilots in China Based on the DEA-Malmquist Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Keyu Luo & Zhenyu Wang & Wei Sha & Jiansheng Wu & Hongliang Wang & Qingliang Zhu, 2021. "Integrating Sponge City Concept and Neural Network into Land Suitability Assessment: Evidence from a Satellite Town of Shenzhen Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Viniece Jennings & Lincoln Larson & Jessica Yun, 2016. "Advancing Sustainability through Urban Green Space: Cultural Ecosystem Services, Equity, and Social Determinants of Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Peihao Tong & Hongxi Yin & Zhifang Wang & Ian Trivers, 2022. "Combining Stormwater Management and Park Services to Mitigate Climate Change and Improve Human Well-Being: A Case Study of Sponge City Parks in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Shi Qiu & Haiwei Yin & Jinling Deng & Muhan Li, 2020. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Green–Gray Stormwater Control Measures for Non-Point Source Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Jansson, Åsa, 2013. "Reaching for a sustainable, resilient urban future using the lens of ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 285-291.
    7. Drakou, E.G. & Crossman, N.D. & Willemen, L. & Burkhard, B. & Palomo, I. & Maes, J. & Peedell, S., 2015. "A visualization and data-sharing tool for ecosystem service maps: Lessons learnt, challenges and the way forward," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 134-140.
    8. Allison Williams & Peter Kitchen, 2012. "Sense of Place and Health in Hamilton, Ontario: A Case Study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 108(2), pages 257-276, September.
    9. Jaekyoung Kim & Junsuk Kang, 2020. "Analysis of Flood Damage in the Seoul Metropolitan Government Using Climate Change Scenarios and Mitigation Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, December.
    10. Hooper, Tara & Cooper, Philip & Hunt, Alistair & Austen, Melanie, 2014. "A methodology for the assessment of local-scale changes in marine environmental benefits and its application," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 65-74.
    11. Qenani-Petrela, Eivis & Noel, Jay E. & Mastin, Thomas, 2007. "A Benefit Transfer Approach to the Estimation of Agro-Ecosystems Services Benefits: A Case Study of Kern County, California," Research Project Reports 121605, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California Institute for the Study of Specialty Crops.
    12. Gerner, Nadine V. & Nafo, Issa & Winking, Caroline & Wencki, Kristina & Strehl, Clemens & Wortberg, Timo & Niemann, André & Anzaldua, Gerardo & Lago, Manuel & Birk, Sebastian, 2018. "Large-scale river restoration pays off: A case study of ecosystem service valuation for the Emscher restoration generation project," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(PB), pages 327-338.
    13. H. Spencer Banzhaf & James Boyd, 2012. "The Architecture and Measurement of an Ecosystem Services Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-32, March.
    14. Wang, Shifeng & Wang, Sicong & Smith, Pete, 2015. "Quantifying impacts of onshore wind farms on ecosystem services at local and global scales," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1424-1428.
    15. Ahmet Tolunay & Çağlar Başsüllü, 2015. "Willingness to Pay for Carbon Sequestration and Co-Benefits of Forests in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-27, March.
    16. Kui Liu & Jian Wang & Xiang Kang & Jingming Liu & Zheyi Xia & Kai Du & Xuexin Zhu, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Population-Land-Economic Urbanization and Its Impact on Urban Carbon Emissions in Shandong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Diane P. Dupont, 2019. "Editorial: Special Issue in Honour of Dr. Steven Renzetti," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(02), pages 1-10, April.
    18. Chunlong Li & Jianzhong Zhou & Shuo Ouyang & Chao Wang & Yi Liu, 2015. "Water Resources Optimal Allocation Based on Large-scale Reservoirs in the Upper Reaches of Yangtze River," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(7), pages 2171-2187, May.
    19. Chun-Chu Yeh & Cheng-Shen Lin & Chin-Huang Huang, 2018. "The Total Economic Value of Sport Tourism in Belt and Road Development—An Environmental Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Bo Yang & Ming-Han Li & Shujuan Li, 2013. "Design-with-Nature for Multifunctional Landscapes: Environmental Benefits and Social Barriers in Community Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5358-:d:552319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.