IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2020i1p258-d470342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plastics Recycling with Tracer-Based-Sorting: Challenges of a Potential Radical Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Gasde

    (Institute for Industrial Ecology (INEC), Pforzheim University of Applied Sciences, Tiefenbronner Str. 65, 75175 Pforzheim, Germany)

  • Jörg Woidasky

    (Institute for Industrial Ecology (INEC), Pforzheim University of Applied Sciences, Tiefenbronner Str. 65, 75175 Pforzheim, Germany)

  • Jochen Moesslein

    (Polysecure GmbH, Sankt-Georgener Str. 19, Geb. 23, 79111 Freiburg, Germany)

  • Claus Lang-Koetz

    (Institute for Industrial Ecology (INEC), Pforzheim University of Applied Sciences, Tiefenbronner Str. 65, 75175 Pforzheim, Germany)

Abstract

To improve the recycling quality of plastics packaging and achieve high recycling rates new identification and sorting technologies are required. Tracer-based-sorting (TBS) is an innovative identification technology based on fluorescent tracers and a corresponding detection unit. TBS can be considered a radical technology change towards a circular economy for plastics and to support sustainability as it has the potential to render several established sorting and/or recycling steps obsolete. This article shows which drivers and barriers are perceived by stakeholders with regard to the implementation of TBS in the market and how challenges are addressed responsibly in the early phases of the innovation process. Influencing external factors and framework conditions of TBS are identified and suitable business models for TBS in a circular economy are discussed. Further, practical recommendations on how to optimize technology and market development for TBS are provided. To obtain these results a mixed method approach of integrated innovation and sustainability analysis, external environment analysis (PESTEL analysis), and business model development approaches was chosen. The research results can be understood as a practical contribution towards a responsible and sustainable implementation of a radical technology-based innovation for a circular economy of plastics.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Gasde & Jörg Woidasky & Jochen Moesslein & Claus Lang-Koetz, 2020. "Plastics Recycling with Tracer-Based-Sorting: Challenges of a Potential Radical Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:258-:d:470342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/258/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/258/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Domenech, Teresa & Bahn-Walkowiak, Bettina, 2019. "Transition Towards a Resource Efficient Circular Economy in Europe: Policy Lessons From the EU and the Member States," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 7-19.
    2. Tatiene Coelho & Rosani Castro & Jose Alcides Gobbo Junior, 2012. "PET Containers in Brazil: A Logistics Model for Post-Consumer Waste Recycling," Chapters, in: Enri Damanhuri (ed.), Post-Consumer Waste Recycling and Optimal Production, IntechOpen.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonidas Milios, 2021. "Towards a Circular Economy Taxation Framework: Expectations and Challenges of Implementation," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    2. Yeo, Lip Siang & Teng, Sin Yong & Ng, Wendy Pei Qin & Lim, Chun Hsion & Leong, Wei Dong & Lam, Hon Loong & Wong, Yat Choy & Sunarso, Jaka & How, Bing Shen, 2022. "Sequential optimization of process and supply chains considering re-refineries for oil and gas circularity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    3. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Ewa Chodakowska & Łukasz Nazarko, 2022. "Evaluating the Transition of the European Union Member States towards a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Hosoda, Takamichi & Disney, Stephen M., 2018. "A unified theory of the dynamics of closed-loop supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 313-326.
    5. Shteryo Nozharov, 2023. "Social costs of curcular economy in European Union," Papers 2401.13675, arXiv.org.
    6. Luo, Anran & Rodríguez, Fabricio & Leipold, Sina, 2020. "Explaining the political gridlock behind international Circular Economy: Chinese and European perspectives on the Waste Ban," SocArXiv uyw5g, Center for Open Science.
    7. Nan-Hua Nadja Yang & Ana Carolina Bertassini & Jéssica Alves Justo Mendes & Mateus Cecílio Gerolamo, 2021. "The ‘3CE2CE’ Framework—Change Management Towards a Circular Economy: Opportunities for Agribusiness," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    8. Zahid Yousaf & Daniela Mihai & Umair Tanveer & Mădălina Brutu & Smaranda Toma & Sheikh Muhammad Zahid, 2022. "Organizational Innovativeness in the Circular Economy: The Interplay of Innovation Networks, Frugal Innovation, and Organizational Readiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Grit Ludwig, 2019. "The Role of Law in Transformative Environmental Policies—A Case Study of “Timber in Buildings Construction in Germany”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Konstantinos Komnitsas, 2020. "Social License to Operate in Mining: Present Views and Future Trends," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Chepeliev, Maksym & Aguiar, Angel & Farole, Thomas & Liverani, Andrea & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2022. "EU Green Deal and Circular Economy Transition: Impacts and Interactions," Conference papers 333431, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Abdul-Jalil Ibrahim & Nasim Shah Shirazi, 2021. "Energy-Water-Environment Nexus and the Transition Towards a Circular Economy: The Case of Qatar," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    13. Elżbieta M. Zębek & Jakub J. Zięty, 2022. "Effect of Landfill Arson to a “Lax” System in a Circular Economy under the Current EU Energy Policy: Perspective Review in Waste Management Law," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-25, November.
    14. Johannes Buhl & Christa Liedtke & Sebastian Schuster & Katrin Bienge, 2020. "Predicting the Material Footprint in Germany between 2015 and 2020 via Seasonally Decomposed Autoregressive and Exponential Smoothing Algorithms," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Saskia Keesstra & Tamara Metze & Linda Ofori & Marleen Buizer & Saskia Visser, 2022. "What Does the Circular Household of the Future Look Like? An Expert-Based Exploration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    16. Dhesigen Naidoo & Luxon Nhamo & Shenelle Lottering & Sylvester Mpandeli & Stanley Liphadzi & Albert T. Modi & Cristina Trois & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2021. "Transitional Pathways towards Achieving a Circular Economy in the Water, Energy, and Food Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Livio Ferrante & Anna Rita Germani, 2020. "Does Circular Economy Play a Key Role in Economic Growth?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(3), pages 1855-1862.
    18. Fernando E. Garcia-Muiña & Rocío González-Sánchez & Anna Maria Ferrari & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2018. "The Paradigms of Industry 4.0 and Circular Economy as Enabling Drivers for the Competitiveness of Businesses and Territories: The Case of an Italian Ceramic Tiles Manufacturing Company," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-31, December.
    19. Patricia Guarnieri & Lucio Camara e Silva & Fazli Haleem & Augusto Bianchini & Jessica Rossi & Brian Vejrum Wæhrens & Sami Farooq & Edgar Reyes & André Luiz Nascimento Reis & Barbara de Oliveira Vieir, 2022. "How Can We Measure the Prioritization of Strategies for Transitioning to a Circular Economy at Macro Level? A New Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-31, December.
    20. Svetlana Ratner & Konstantin Gomonov & Inna Lazanyuk & Svetlana Revinova, 2021. "Barriers and Drivers for Circular Economy 2.0 on the Firm Level: Russian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:258-:d:470342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.