IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3543-d350840.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Technical Flexibility Retrofit Planning of Thermal Power Units Considering High Penetration Variable Renewable Energy: The Case of China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaomin Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Tong Guo

    (State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Yue Wang

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Yonggang Li

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Shanshan Xu

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

Abstract

High penetration variable renewable energy introduces flexibility issues to the power system. For countries with coal as their main energy source, retrofitting existing thermal power units is one of the most realistic and feasible measures to improve power system flexibility. Multiple retrofit options will almost certainly be available for each individual power plant—all with distinct investment costs and performance implications. Therefore, this paper develops a multi-technical flexibility retrofit planning model to inform investment decisions of thermal power units in the short term. The model is formulated as a mix linear programming, with the goal of minimizing the systems overall investment and operational costs. In particular, a linear formulation is proposed to solve the coupling problem of retrofitting and operating, and take account of the changes in various units’ operational parameters after retrofit. The correctness and effectiveness of the proposed models are verified by a case study through a modified IEEE-30 bus system. The results demonstrate that it is necessary to consider the complementariness of multiple technologies between units. Besides, the proposed model could minimize the overall system investment and operational costs, and provide advice to planners and power generation companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaomin Liu & Tong Guo & Yue Wang & Yonggang Li & Shanshan Xu, 2020. "Multi-Technical Flexibility Retrofit Planning of Thermal Power Units Considering High Penetration Variable Renewable Energy: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3543-:d:350840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3543/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3543/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Jonghe, Cedric & Delarue, Erik & Belmans, Ronnie & D'haeseleer, William, 2011. "Determining optimal electricity technology mix with high level of wind power penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2231-2238, June.
    2. Yin, Chungen & Yan, Jinyue, 2016. "Oxy-fuel combustion of pulverized fuels: Combustion fundamentals and modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 742-762.
    3. Chunning Na & Huan Pan & Yuhong Zhu & Jiahai Yuan & Lixia Ding & Jungang Yu, 2019. "The Flexible Operation of Coal Power and Its Renewable Integration Potential in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Oriol Raventós & Julian Bartels, 2020. "Evaluation of Temporal Complexity Reduction Techniques Applied to Storage Expansion Planning in Power System Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Xiao Gong & Fan Li & Bo Sun & Dong Liu, 2020. "Collaborative Optimization of Multi-Energy Complementary Combined Cooling, Heating, and Power Systems Considering Schedulable Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Chunning Na & Jiahai Yuan & Yuhong Zhu & Li Xue, 2018. "Economic Decision-Making for Coal Power Flexibility Retrofitting and Compensation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Poncelet, Kris & Delarue, Erik & Six, Daan & Duerinck, Jan & D’haeseleer, William, 2016. "Impact of the level of temporal and operational detail in energy-system planning models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 631-643.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Veterina Nosadila Riaventin & Sofyan Dwi Cahyo & Ivan Kristianto Singgih, 2021. "A Model for Developing Existing Ports Considering Economic Impact and Network Connectivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Ting Wang & Qiya Wang & Caiqing Zhang, 2021. "Research on the Optimal Operation of a Novel Renewable Multi-Energy Complementary System in Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Jianjun Wang & Jikun Huo & Shuo Zhang & Yun Teng & Li Li & Taoya Han, 2021. "Flexibility Transformation Decision-Making Evaluation of Coal-Fired Thermal Power Units Deep Peak Shaving in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vrionis, Constantinos & Tsalavoutis, Vasilios & Tolis, Athanasios, 2020. "A Generation Expansion Planning model for integrating high shares of renewable energy: A Meta-Model Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Niina Helistö & Juha Kiviluoma & Hannele Holttinen & Jose Daniel Lara & Bri‐Mathias Hodge, 2019. "Including operational aspects in the planning of power systems with large amounts of variable generation: A review of modeling approaches," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(5), September.
    3. Bissiri, M. & Moura, P. & Figueiredo, N.C. & Silva, P.P., 2020. "Towards a renewables-based future for West African States: A review of power systems planning approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Oree, Vishwamitra & Sayed Hassen, Sayed Z. & Fleming, Peter J., 2019. "A multi-objective framework for long-term generation expansion planning with variable renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Ringkjøb, Hans-Kristian & Haugan, Peter M. & Seljom, Pernille & Lind, Arne & Wagner, Fabian & Mesfun, Sennai, 2020. "Short-term solar and wind variability in long-term energy system models - A European case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Prina, Matteo Giacomo & Nastasi, Benedetto & Groppi, Daniele & Misconel, Steffi & Garcia, Davide Astiaso & Sparber, Wolfram, 2022. "Comparison methods of energy system frameworks, models and scenario results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Poncelet, Kris & Delarue, Erik & D’haeseleer, William, 2020. "Unit commitment constraints in long-term planning models: Relevance, pitfalls and the role of assumptions on flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    8. Hoffmann, Maximilian & Kotzur, Leander & Stolten, Detlef, 2022. "The Pareto-optimal temporal aggregation of energy system models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    9. Hilbers, Adriaan P. & Brayshaw, David J. & Gandy, Axel, 2019. "Importance subsampling: improving power system planning under climate-based uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Tom Brijs & Arne van Stiphout & Sauleh Siddiqui & Ronnie Belmans, 2016. "Evaluating the Role of Electricity Storage by Considering Short-Term Operation in Long-Term Planning," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1624, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    11. Collins, Seán & Deane, John Paul & Poncelet, Kris & Panos, Evangelos & Pietzcker, Robert C. & Delarue, Erik & Ó Gallachóir, Brian Pádraig, 2017. "Integrating short term variations of the power system into integrated energy system models: A methodological review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 839-856.
    12. Lu, Nianci & Pan, Lei & Liu, Zhenxiang & Song, Yajun & Si, Paiyou, 2021. "Flexible operation control strategy for thermos-exchanger water level of two-by-one combined cycle gas turbine based on heat network storage utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Buchholz, Stefanie & Gamst, Mette & Pisinger, David, 2020. "Sensitivity analysis of time aggregation techniques applied to capacity expansion energy system models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    14. Göke, Leonard & Kendziorski, Mario, 2022. "Adequacy of time-series reduction for renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    15. Haonan Zhang & Xingping Zhang & Jiahai Yuan, 2020. "Coal power in China: A multi‐level perspective review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(6), November.
    16. Kostevšek, Anja & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Papa, Gregor & Petek, Janez, 2016. "The concept of an ecosystem model to support the transformation to sustainable energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1460-1469.
    17. Vithayasrichareon, Peerapat & MacGill, Iain F., 2013. "Assessing the value of wind generation in future carbon constrained electricity industries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 400-412.
    18. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    19. Pandžić, Hrvoje & Kuzle, Igor & Capuder, Tomislav, 2013. "Virtual power plant mid-term dispatch optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 134-141.
    20. Meng, Wenliang & Wang, Dongliang & Zhou, Huairong & Yang, Yong & Li, Hongwei & Liao, Zuwei & Yang, Siyu & Hong, Xiaodong & Li, Guixian, 2023. "Carbon dioxide from oxy-fuel coal-fired power plant integrated green ammonia for urea synthesis: Process modeling, system analysis, and techno-economic evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3543-:d:350840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.