IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i7p2857-d341096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Driving Mechanism of Port-City Spatial Relation Evolution from an Ecological Perspective: Case Study of Xiamen Port of China

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Yu

    (College of Transport and Communications, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China
    CCCC Third Harbor Consultants Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200032, China)

  • Pengfei Xu

    (CCCC Third Harbor Consultants Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200032, China)

  • Jia Shi

    (College of Transport and Communications, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Jihong Chen

    (College of Transport and Communications, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Hong Zhen

    (College of Transport and Communications, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

Abstract

With the economic globalization continuing to advance, coastal port cities have enjoyed increasingly prominent status and roles as the link between the sea and the land and an important window of foreign trade and exchanges. However, port cities, while embracing rapid development, have also produced a significant impact on natural resources and the ecological environment. Ecological environment protection has become a must-consider factor for sustainable development of port cities. To secure coordinated and sustainable development of ports and cities, this paper utilizes the system dynamics theory and approaches the subject from driver analysis. In the traditional port-city collaboration system model, indicators of ecological perspectives such as land resources and environmental protection are introduced to build a dynamic model for the spatial evolution system of port-city coupling system based on ecological protection, and the dynamic mechanism of port-city spatial relation evolution is analyzed in depth with a case study of Dongdu Port Area of Xiamen Port. The model’s simulation results show that from an ecological perspective, the spatial distance between the port and the city is critical to their sustainable and coordinated development. Only after the port-city spatial distance increases moderately can the development efficiency of the port-city system welcomes a relatively significant increase. Managing the port-city distance well has a significant driving effect on capacity enhancement of the port and economic development of the city. This provides a theoretical reference for further studies on port-city coordinated and sustainable development and provides constructive suggestions for the government to make relevant decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Yu & Pengfei Xu & Jia Shi & Jihong Chen & Hong Zhen, 2020. "Driving Mechanism of Port-City Spatial Relation Evolution from an Ecological Perspective: Case Study of Xiamen Port of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2857-:d:341096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2857/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2857/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chengjin Wang & César Ducruet, 2012. "New port development and global city making : Emergence of the Shanghai-Yangshan multilayered gateway hub," Post-Print hal-03246961, HAL.
    2. Van den Berghe, Karel & Jacobs, Wouter & Boelens, Luuk, 2018. "The relational geometry of the port-city interface: Case studies of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Ghent, Belgium," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 55-63.
    3. Theo E. Notteboom * & Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2005. "Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 297-313, July.
    4. Chengjin Wang & César Ducruet, 2012. "New port development and global city making: Emergence of the Shanghai-Yangshan multilayered gateway hub," Post-Print halshs-00717879, HAL.
    5. Monios, Jason & Bergqvist, Rickard & Woxenius, Johan, 2018. "Port-centric cities: The role of freight distribution in defining the port-city relationship," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 53-64.
    6. Wang, Chengjin & Ducruet, César, 2012. "New port development and global city making: emergence of the Shanghai–Yangshan multilayered gateway hub," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 58-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephen J. Ramos, 2021. "Materiality in the Seam Space: Sketches for a Transitional Port City Dome District," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 210-222.
    2. Haibo Kuang & Jiayu Zhu & Zhizhen Bai, 2023. "Study on the Interaction between Green Competitiveness of Coastal Ports and Hinterland Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Marina Zanne & Elen Twrdy & Bojan Beškovnik, 2021. "The Effect of Port Gate Location and Gate Procedures on the Port-City Relation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Ziran & Lei, Liping & Zhang, Jianzhen & Wang, Chengjin & Ye, Shilin, 2023. "Spatio-temporal evolution and location factors of port and shipping service enterprises: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    2. Qu, Chenrui & Zeng, Qingcheng & Li, Kevin X. & Lin, Kun-Chin, 2020. "Modeling incentive strategies for landside integration in multimodal transport chains," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 47-64.
    3. Zheng, Jianfeng & Yang, Dong, 2016. "Hub-and-spoke network design for container shipping along the Yangtze River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 51-57.
    4. Yang, Jinglei & Luo, Meifeng & Ji, Abing, 2016. "Analyzing the spatial–temporal evolution of a gateway’s hinterland: A case study of Shanghai, China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 355-367.
    5. Song, Lili & van Geenhuizen, Marina, 2014. "Port infrastructure investment and regional economic growth in China: Panel evidence in port regions and provinces," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 173-183.
    6. Feng, Hongxiang & Grifoll, Manel & Zheng, Pengjun, 2019. "From a feeder port to a hub port: The evolution pathways, dynamics and perspectives of Ningbo-Zhoushan port (China)," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 21-35.
    7. Ziran, Jiang & Chunfang, Pi & Huayou, Zhu & Chengjin, Wang & Shilin, Ye, 2022. "Temporal and spatial evolution and influencing factors of the port system in Yangtze River Delta Region from the perspective of dual circulation: Comparing port domestic trade throughput with port for," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 79-90.
    8. Park, Jin Suk & Seo, Young-Joon, 2016. "The impact of seaports on the regional economies in South Korea: Panel evidence from the augmented Solow model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 107-119.
    9. Zhang, Qiang & Yan, Kai & Yang, Dong, 2021. "Port system evolution in Chinese coastal regions: A provincial perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Notteboom, Theo & Yang, Dong & Xu, Hua, 2020. "Container barge network development in inland rivers: A comparison between the Yangtze River and the Rhine River," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 587-605.
    11. Yang, Dong & Wang, Kelly Yujie & Xu, Hua & Zhang, Zhehui, 2017. "Path to a multilayered transshipment port system: How the Yangtze River bulk port system has evolved," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 54-64.
    12. Chengjin Wang & César Ducruet, 2013. "Regional resilience and spatial cycles: Long-term evolution of the Chinese port system (221BC-2010AD)," Post-Print halshs-00831906, HAL.
    13. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Arasteh, Mojtaba, 2020. "Core-port connectivity: Towards shaping a national hinterland in a West Asia country," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 57-68.
    14. Carlucci, Fabio & Cirà, Andrea & Ioppolo, Giuseppe & Massari, Stefania & Siviero, Lucio, 2018. "Logistics and land use planning: An application of the ACIT indicator in European port regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 60-69.
    15. Monios, Jason, 2017. "Cascading feeder vessels and the rationalisation of small container ports," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 88-99.
    16. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason, 2015. "The production of capitalist “smooth” space in global port operations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 59-69.
    17. Feng, Lin & Yuan, Liwei, 2017. "A developmental model on quantifying urban policy effectiveness in port city relations," MPRA Paper 81037, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason & Pérez-Salas, Gabriel, 2014. "Port system evolution – the case of Latin America and the Caribbean," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 208-221.
    19. Wan, Zheng & Zhang, Yang & Wang, Xuefeng & Chen, Jihong, 2014. "Policy and politics behind Shanghai’s Free Trade Zone Program," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-6.
    20. Feng, Hongxiang & Grifoll, Manel & Yang, Zhongzhen & Zheng, Pengjun, 2021. "Latest challenges to ports in public-private partnership: Case of Dandong Port (China)'s bankruptcy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 293-305.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2857-:d:341096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.