IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p1755-d325509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexity Stage Model of the Medical Device Development Based on Economic Evaluation—MedDee

Author

Listed:
  • Petra Marešová

    (Department of Economics, University of Hradec Kralove, Rokitanskeho 62, 3 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic)

  • Lukáš Peter

    (Department of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, FEEC, 17. Listopadu 15, 708 33 Ostrava—Poruba, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Honegr

    (Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic)

  • Lukáš Režný

    (Department of Economics, University of Hradec Kralove, Rokitanskeho 62, 3 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic)

  • Marek Penhaker

    (Department of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, FEEC, 17. Listopadu 15, 708 33 Ostrava—Poruba, Czech Republic)

  • Martin Augustýnek

    (Department of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, FEEC, 17. Listopadu 15, 708 33 Ostrava—Poruba, Czech Republic)

  • Hana Mohelská

    (Department of Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Rokitanskeho 62, 3 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic)

  • Blanka Klímová

    (Department of Applied Linguistics, University of Hradec Kralove, Rokitanskeho 62, 3 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic)

  • Kamil Kuča

    (Department of Economics, University of Hradec Kralove, Rokitanskeho 62, 3 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The development of a new product is essential for the progress and success of any company. The medical device market is very specific, which is challenging. Therefore, this paper assesses an economic model for medical device evaluation using the economic, health, technology regulatory, and present market knowledge to enable the cost–time conception for any applicant. The purpose of this study is to propose a comprehensive stage model of the medical device development to subsequently describe the financial expenditure of the entire development process. The identification of critical steps was based on the literature review, and analysis, and a comparison of the available medical device development stages and directives. Furthermore, a preliminary assessment of the medical device development steps and procedures on the basis of the interviews was performed. Six interviews were conducted with an average duration of one hour, focusing on areas: relevance and level of detail of the medical device development stages, involvement of economic methods, and applicability of the proposed model. Subsequently, the improvement and modification of the medical device investment process, based on respondents’ responses, were conducted. The authors have proposed the complexity model MedDee—Medical Devices Development by Economic Evaluation. This model is comprised of six phases: initiation, concept, design, production, final verification, and market disposition in which the economic methods are incorporated.

Suggested Citation

  • Petra Marešová & Lukáš Peter & Jan Honegr & Lukáš Režný & Marek Penhaker & Martin Augustýnek & Hana Mohelská & Blanka Klímová & Kamil Kuča, 2020. "Complexity Stage Model of the Medical Device Development Based on Economic Evaluation—MedDee," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1755-:d:325509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1755/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/1755/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maarten J. IJzerman & Hendrik Koffijberg & Elisabeth Fenwick & Murray Krahn, 2017. "Emerging Use of Early Health Technology Assessment in Medical Product Development: A Scoping Review of the Literature," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 35(7), pages 727-740, July.
    2. Brockis, E. & Marsden, G. & Cole, A. & Devlin, N., 2016. "A Review of NICE Methods Across Health Technology Assessment Programmes: Differences, Justifications and Implications," Research Papers 001703, Office of Health Economics.
    3. Korol, Tomasz, 2013. "Early warning models against bankruptcy risk for Central European and Latin American enterprises," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 22-30.
    4. Susanne Hartz & Jürgen John, 2007. "The contribution of economic evaluation to decision-making in early phases of product development: a methodological and empirical review," Jena Economic Research Papers 2007-094, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    5. Munjae Lee & Sewon Park & Kyu-Sung Lee, 2019. "What Are the Features of Successful Medical Device Start-Ups? Evidence from KOREA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maarten Ijzerman & Lotte Steuten, 2011. "Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 9(5), pages 331-347, September.
    2. Amani, Farzaneh A. & Fadlalla, Adam M., 2017. "Data mining applications in accounting: A review of the literature and organizing framework," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 32-58.
    3. David Alaminos & Agustín del Castillo & Manuel Ángel Fernández, 2016. "A Global Model for Bankruptcy Prediction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Fatima Zahra Azayite & Said Achchab, 2019. "A hybrid neural network model based on improved PSO and SA for bankruptcy prediction," Papers 1907.12179, arXiv.org.
    5. Muñoz-Izquierdo, Nora & Segovia-Vargas, María Jesús & Camacho-Miñano, María-del-Mar & Pascual-Ezama, David, 2019. "Explaining the causes of business failure using audit report disclosures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 403-414.
    6. du Jardin, Philippe, 2015. "Bankruptcy prediction using terminal failure processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 286-303.
    7. Tomasz Korol, 2020. "Assessment of Trajectories of Non-bankrupt and Bankrupt Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1113-1135.
    8. Cosmina Lelia Voinea & Marcel Logger & Fawad Rauf & Nadine Roijakkers, 2019. "Drivers for Sustainable Business Models in Start-Ups: Multiple Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Joyce Craig & Louise Carr & John Hutton & Julie Glanville & Cynthia Iglesias & Andrew Sims, 2015. "A Review of the Economic Tools for Assessing New Medical Devices," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 15-27, February.
    10. Tom Lung & Kirsten Howard & Christopher Etherton-Beer & Moira Sim & Gill Lewin & Glenn Arendts, 2017. "Comparison of the HUI3 and the EQ-5D-3L in a nursing home setting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-10, February.
    11. Santosh Kumar Shrivastav & P. Janaki Ramudu, 2020. "Bankruptcy Prediction and Stress Quantification Using Support Vector Machine: Evidence from Indian Banks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Tamara Ayœs, Armando Lenin & Villegas, Gladis Cecilia & Leones Castro, María Cristina & Salazar Bocanegra, Juan Antonio, 2018. "Modelaci—n del riesgo de insolvencia en empresas del sector salud empleando modelos logit || Modeling of Insolvency Risk in Health Sector Companies Using Logit Models," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 26(1), pages 128-145, Diciembre.
    13. Sumaira Ashraf & Elisabete G. S. Félix & Zélia Serrasqueiro, 2019. "Do Traditional Financial Distress Prediction Models Predict the Early Warning Signs of Financial Distress?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Jonathan Dando & Maximilian Lebmeier, 2020. "A novel valuation model for medical intervention development based on progressive dynamic changes that integrates Health Technology Assessment outcomes with early-stage innovation and indication-speci," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-28, December.
    15. Adam Fridhammar & Ulrika Axelsson & Ulf Persson & Anders Bjartell & Carl A. K. Borrebaeck, 2021. "The Value of a New Diagnostic Test for Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Utility Analysis in Early Stage of Development," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 77-88, March.
    16. Markiewicz, Katarzyna & van Til, Janine A. & Steuten, Lotte M.G. & IJzerman, Maarten J., 2016. "Commercial viability of medical devices using Headroom and return on investment calculation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 338-346.
    17. Spyridou, Anastasia, 2019. "Evaluating Factors of Small and Medium Hospitality Enterprises Business Failure: a conceptual approach," MPRA Paper 93997, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Ednawati Rainarli & Aurelius Aaron, 2015. "The Implementation of Fuzzy Logic to Predict the Bankruptcy of Company in Indonesia," International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, vol. 1(4), pages 147-154.
    19. Maarten J. IJzerman & Hendrik Koffijberg & Elisabeth Fenwick & Murray Krahn, 2017. "Emerging Use of Early Health Technology Assessment in Medical Product Development: A Scoping Review of the Literature," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 35(7), pages 727-740, July.
    20. Straker, Karla & Peel, Sean & Nusem, Erez & Wrigley, Cara, 2021. "Designing a dangerous unicorn: Lessons from the Theranos case," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 525-536.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1755-:d:325509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.