IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i23p10112-d456010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Funding Mechanisms for US Floodplain Buyouts

Author

Listed:
  • Kelsey Peterson

    (Institute for the Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #3140, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA)

  • Emily Apadula

    (Institute for the Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #3140, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA)

  • David Salvesen

    (Institute for the Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #3140, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA)

  • Miyuki Hino

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #3140, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA)

  • Rebecca Kihslinger

    (The Environmental Law Institute, 1730 M St. NW #700, Washington, DC 20036, USA)

  • Todd K. BenDor

    (Institute for the Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #3140, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
    Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #3140, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA)

Abstract

Increases in extreme weather events have caused extensive flooding across the United States. In response, federal, state, and local governments have broadened their flood mitigation strategies to include acquisition and demolition of flood-damaged homes (“buyouts”). Little work has documented or analyzed the range of strategies for funding buyouts. Federal programs provide the bulk of funding, but these programs are often slow. Also, state and local governments struggle to meet cost-match requirements. We present and analyze a nationwide census of buyout funding programs (n = 34), which draw on five primary funding mechanisms. We find that state and local governments are using a range of traditional and innovative financial mechanisms, including municipal/green bonds, revolving loan funds, local option sales taxes, and stormwater utility fees, as viable tools for funding buyouts. These tools may promote more autonomy from federal government mitigation programs, and ultimately, faster buyout processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelsey Peterson & Emily Apadula & David Salvesen & Miyuki Hino & Rebecca Kihslinger & Todd K. BenDor, 2020. "A Review of Funding Mechanisms for US Floodplain Buyouts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10112-:d:456010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10112/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10112/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jerry Zhirong Zhao & Camila Fonseca & Raihana Zeerak, 2019. "Stormwater Utility Fees and Credits: A Funding Strategy for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Andreas Karpf & Antoine Mandel, 2018. "The changing value of the ‘green’ label on the US municipal bond market," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(2), pages 161-165, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simone Rusci & Diego Altafini & Valerio Di Pinto, 2021. "Urban Demolition: Application of Blight Elimination Programs and Flood Buyout Programs to the Italian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Curran-Groome, William & Hino, Miyuki & BenDor, Todd K. & Salvesen, David, 2022. "Complexities and costs of floodplain buyout implementation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Linda Shi & Anjali Fisher & Rebecca M. Brenner & Amelia Greiner-Safi & Christine Shepard & Jamie Vanucchi, 2022. "Equitable buyouts? Learning from state, county, and local floodplain management programs," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 174(3), pages 1-20, October.
    4. William Curran-Groome & Hallee Haygood & Miyuki Hino & Todd K. BenDor & David Salvesen, 2021. "Assessing the full costs of floodplain buyouts," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 1-23, September.
    5. A. Bukvic & C. W. Zobel, 2024. "Flood-induced mobility in rural and urban coastal jurisdictions: a homeowner’s perspective," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(11), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Haiyan Hao & Yan Wang, 2024. "The emerging “evident” role of climatic risk on migration: a study of four U.S. metropolitans," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Elyse Zavar & Sherri Brokopp Binder & Alex Greer & Amber Breaux, 2023. "Using the past to understand future property acquisitions: an examination of historic voluntary and mandatory household relocations," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 1973-1993, March.
    8. Landry, Craig & Syphers, Steven & Keeler, Andrew, 2022. "Preferences for Post-storm Coastal Adaptation," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 322385, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirschenmann Karolin, 2022. "The EU Taxonomy’s (Potential) Effects on the Banking Sector and Bank Lending to Firms," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 275-283, December.
    2. Dong, Xiao & Yu, Mingzhe, 2024. "Green bond issuance and green innovation: Evidence from China's energy industry," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Fatica, Serena & Panzica, Roberto & Rancan, Michela, 2021. "The pricing of green bonds: Are financial institutions special?," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    4. Ren, Xiaohang & Li, Yiying & yan, Cheng & Wen, Fenghua & Lu, Zudi, 2022. "The interrelationship between the carbon market and the green bonds market: Evidence from wavelet quantile-on-quantile method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Liebich, Lena & Nöh, Lukas & Rutkowski, Felix & Schwarz, Milena, 2020. "Current developments in green finance," Working Papers 05/2020, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung.
    6. Shi, Jinyan & Yu, Conghui & Li, Yanxi & Wang, Tianhe, 2022. "Does green financial policy affect debt-financing cost of heavy-polluting enterprises? An empirical evidence based on Chinese pilot zones for green finance reform and innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Monasterolo, Irene & de Angelis, Luca, 2020. "Blind to carbon risk? An analysis of stock market reaction to the Paris Agreement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Giuseppe Cortellini & Ida Claudia Panetta, 2021. "Green Bond: A Systematic Literature Review for Future Research Agendas," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-29, December.
    9. Mosquera-López, Stephania & Uribe, Jorge M., 2022. "Pricing the risk due to weather conditions in small variable renewable energy projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    10. Hinsche, Isabelle Cathérine, 2021. "A greenium for the next generation EU green bonds: Analysis of a potential green bond premium and its drivers," CFS Working Paper Series 663, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    11. Monika Hadaś-Dyduch & Blandyna Puszer & Maria Czech & Janusz Cichy, 2022. "Green Bonds as an Instrument for Financing Ecological Investments in the V4 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-48, September.
    12. Broadstock, David C. & Cheng, Louis T.W., 2019. "Time-varying relation between black and green bond price benchmarks: Macroeconomic determinants for the first decade," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 17-22.
    13. Pham, Linh & Cepni, Oguzhan, 2022. "Extreme directional spillovers between investor attention and green bond markets," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 186-210.
    14. repec:hig:wpaper:101sti2019 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Qi, Yu & Zhang, Hongxuan & Shao, Shuai, 2024. "Valuing high temperature's fiscal costs: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 134-152.
    16. Kanamura, Takashi, 2021. "Risk Mitigation and Return Resilience for High Yield Bond ETFs with ESG Components," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    17. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M.Ángeles & Caby, Jérôme & Šević, Aleksandar, 2021. "The influence of investor sentiment on the green bond market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. Serena Fatica & Roberto Panzica, 2021. "Green bonds as a tool against climate change?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2688-2701, July.
    19. Yanli Wang & Xiaodong Lei & Dongxiao Zhao & Ruyin Long & Meifen Wu, 2021. "The Dual Impacts of Green Credit on Economy and Environment: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Yuanfeng Hu & Yixiang Tian & Luping Zhang, 2023. "Green Bond Pricing and Optimization Based on Carbon Emission Trading and Subsidies: From the Perspective of Externalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    21. Qinghua Wang & Yaning Zhou & Li Luo & Junping Ji, 2019. "Research on the Factors Affecting the Risk Premium of China’s Green Bond Issuance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-14, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10112-:d:456010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.