IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9197-d440438.html

“Following the Science”: In Search of Evidence-Based Policy for Indoor Air Pollution from Radon in Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • Anthea R. Lacchia

    (iCRAG, Irish Centre for Research in Applied Geosciences, UCD School of Earth Sciences, University College Dublin, D04 N2E5 Dublin, Ireland
    Science Communication Unit, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK
    School of Business, University College Dublin, A94 XF34 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Geertje Schuitema

    (iCRAG, Irish Centre for Research in Applied Geosciences, UCD School of Earth Sciences, University College Dublin, D04 N2E5 Dublin, Ireland
    School of Business, University College Dublin, A94 XF34 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Aparajita Banerjee

    (School of Business, University College Dublin, A94 XF34 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

Radon, a naturally occurring radioactive gas that can accumulate inside dwellings, represents the second biggest cause of lung cancer globally. In Ireland, radon is linked to approximately 300 lung cancer cases every year, equating to 12% of all lung cancer deaths. Despite the health risks posed by radon air pollution, Ireland lacks well-defined and universally applicable air pollution-related public health policies. Through purposive literature sampling, we critically examine the case of indoor radon policy development in Ireland. Specifically, we analyse the evidence-based policymaking process relating to indoor radon pollution from three different knowledge dimensions, namely political, scientific, and practical knowledge. In doing so, we identify various challenges inherent to pollution-related public policymaking. We highlight the difficulties of balancing and integrating information from multiple disciplines and perspectives and argue that input from multiple scientific areas is crucial, but can only be achieved through continued, dialogic communication between stakeholders. On the basis of our analysis, we suggest that a transdisciplinary perspective, defined as a holistic approach which subordinates disciplines and looks at the dynamics of whole systems, will allow evidence-based policymaking to be effective. We end with recommendations for evidence-based policymaking when it comes to public health hazards such as radon, which are applicable to sustainable air pollution management beyond Ireland.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthea R. Lacchia & Geertje Schuitema & Aparajita Banerjee, 2020. "“Following the Science”: In Search of Evidence-Based Policy for Indoor Air Pollution from Radon in Ireland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9197-:d:440438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9197/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9197/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teresa Hooks & Geertje Schuitema & Frank McDermott, 2019. "Risk Perceptions Toward Drinking Water Quality Among Private Well Owners in Ireland: The Illusion of Control," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(8), pages 1741-1754, August.
    2. Sintov, Nicole D. & Schuitema, Geertje, 2018. "Odd couple or perfect pair? Tensions and recommendations for social scientist-industry partnerships in energy research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 247-251.
    3. Daniela M. Salvioni & Alex Almici, 2020. "Transitioning Toward a Circular Economy: The Impact of Stakeholder Engagement on Sustainability Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    4. Roberto Ricciuti, 2004. "Political Fragmentation and Fiscal Outcomes," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 118(3_4), pages 365-388, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juliana P. Sá & Pedro T. B. S. Branco & Maria C. M. Alvim-Ferraz & Fernando G. Martins & Sofia I. V. Sousa, 2022. "Radon in Indoor Air: Towards Continuous Monitoring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-11, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adriano Cordisco & Riccardo Melloni & Lucia Botti, 2022. "Sustainable Circular Economy for the Integration of Disadvantaged People: A Preliminary Study on the Reuse of Lithium-Ion Batteries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Ibrahim Tutar & Aysit Tansel, 2012. "An Analysis Of Political And Institutional Power Dispersion: The Case Of Turkey," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 30(4), pages 548-565, October.
    3. Alessio Franconi & Fabrizio Ceschin & David Peck, 2022. "Structuring Circular Objectives and Design Strategies for the Circular Economy: A Multi-Hierarchical Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Christopher Berry, 2008. "Piling On: Multilevel Government and the Fiscal Common‐Pool," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(4), pages 802-820, October.
    5. Tjaša Bjedov & Simon Lapointe & Thierry Madiès, 2014. "The impact of within-party and between-party ideological dispersion on fiscal outcomes: evidence from Swiss cantonal parliaments," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 209-232, October.
    6. Nadia Fiorino & Nicola Pontarollo & Roberto Ricciuti, 2016. "Voter Turnout in European Parliament Elections: A Spatial Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 5910, CESifo.
    7. Bharatee Dash & Angara Raja, 2013. "Do political determinants affect the size and composition of public expenditure? A study of the Indian states," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 60(3), pages 293-317, September.
    8. Maaz Ahmad Khan & Ritika Mahajan, 2025. "Exploring factors influencing circular economy adoption and firm-level practices in the agribusiness sector: an exploratory study of Indian firms," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 9039-9069, April.
    9. Sadia Samar Ali & Belkız Torğul & Turan Paksoy & Sunil Luthra & Yasanur Kayikci, 2024. "A novel hybrid decision‐making framework for measuring Industry 4.0‐driven circular economy performance for textile industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 7825-7854, December.
    10. Kauder Björn & Larin Benjamin & Potrafke Niklas, 2014. "Was bringt uns die große Koalition?: Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 88-101, February.
    11. Veronika Vaseková, 2022. "How do people in China perceive water? From health threat perception to environmental policy change," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 627-645, September.
    12. Amalesh Sharma & Sourav Bikash Borah & Tanjum Haque & Anirban Adhikary, 2025. "Engaging customers and suppliers for environmental sustainability: Investigating the drivers and the effects on firm performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 341-366, March.
    13. Claudia de Luca & Javier López-Murcia & Elisa Conticelli & Angela Santangelo & Michelle Perello & Simona Tondelli, 2021. "Participatory Process for Regenerating Rural Areas through Heritage-Led Plans: The RURITAGE Community-Based Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Valérie Lacombe & Juste Rajaonson, 2025. "Strategic Dynamics of Circular Economy Initiatives in Food Systems: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Lukas Alexander Benz, 2022. "Critical Success Factors for Circular Business Model Innovation from the Perspective of the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Ornelas, Emanuel & Cunha, Alexandre B., 2014. "Political Competition and the Limits of Political Compromise," CEPR Discussion Papers 9909, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    17. Shai Fernández & Ulf Bodin & Kåre Synnes, 2025. "On the Interplay Between Behavior Dynamics, Environmental Impacts, and Fairness in the Digitalized Circular Economy with Associated Business Models and Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-39, April.
    18. Intan Murnira Ramli & Michelle Chandra Kasih, 2023. "Integrative Report on Implementation of the Circular Economy in ASEAN," Books, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), number 2023-RPR-27 edited by Intan Murnira Ramli & Michelle Chandra Kasih, April.
    19. Hessami, Zohal, 2010. "Corruption and the Composition of Public Expenditures: Evidence from OECD Countries," MPRA Paper 25945, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Ayman Harb & Fawwaz Ali Alhammad & Tawfiq Aref Almajali & Ahmed Freewan & Hanan M. K. Shkokani & Muna Slehat, 2025. "Promoting Tourism Sustainability in Jordan: Policy Effectiveness and Stakeholders Perspectives," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 12(2), pages 175-196, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9197-:d:440438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.