IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9182-d440100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communication and Information Flow in Polish Construction Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Ewelina Kania

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)

  • Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Śladowski

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Cracow, Poland)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to analyse communication and information flow within construction projects on the basis of a survey study and a review of the literature. The subject of communication and its impact on carrying out a construction project is widely discussed in global academic literature. Many scholars point to problems with communication and information flow while also reporting that it directly affects construction project time and cost. In the literature, communication is also presented as an essential factor that improves safety and partnering in construction projects. There is also a group of studies that points to the lack of effective communication as the cause of delays and modifications. The authors, in reference to global studies, present the results of a survey study performed in Poland on a group of 160 construction industry practitioners. Information about five research areas was collected. These areas included: general information about communication and information flow between construction project participants, problems in carrying out construction projects in relation to the lack of effective communication, the impact of communication on the success of carrying out a construction project, communication costs, and the need to develop a tool (a digital system) that would support construction project managers in the optimal control over communication between project participants. On the basis of the obtained research results and the literature study, it was found that effective communication and information flow within a construction project can improve the construction process and that there exists a need to develop a comprehensive approach that would aid construction project managers in ensuring a more effective information flow.

Suggested Citation

  • Ewelina Kania & Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina & Grzegorz Śladowski, 2020. "Communication and Information Flow in Polish Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9182-:d:440100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9182/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9182/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S.Z.S. Tabish & Kumar Neeraj Jha, 2011. "Identification and evaluation of success factors for public construction projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(8), pages 809-823, August.
    2. P. E. D. Love & P. Mandal & H. Li, 1999. "Determining the causal structure of rework influences in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 505-517.
    3. Liaquat Hossain, 2009. "Communications and coordination in construction projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 25-39.
    4. Dylan Tutt & Sarah Pink & Andy R.J. Dainty & Alistair Gibb, 2013. "'In the air' and below the horizon: migrant workers in UK construction and the practice-based nature of learning and communicating OHS," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 515-527, June.
    5. Rayyan Alsamadani & Matthew Hallowell & Amy Nicole Javernick-Will, 2013. "Measuring and modelling safety communication in small work crews in the US using social network analysis," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 568-579, June.
    6. Bhavana Pandit & Alex Albert & Yashwardhan Patil, 2020. "Developing construction hazard recognition skill: leveraging safety climate and social network safety communication patterns," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(7), pages 640-658, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hosang Hyun & Hyunsoo Kim & Hyun-Soo Lee & Moonseo Park & Jeonghoon Lee, 2020. "Integrated Design Process for Modular Construction Projects to Reduce Rework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Prince Destiny Ugo, 2017. "Project Quality Management Performance: An Insight to Sustainable Development Initiatives in Oil and Gas Host Communities," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(4), pages 76-88, December.
    3. Khalid K. Naji & Murat Gunduz & Fahid Al-Henzab, 2024. "Evaluating the Digital Transformation Potential in Pre-Construction for Sustainable Practices Using Structural Equation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-33, August.
    4. Sainan Lyu & Carol K. H. Hon & Albert P. C. Chan & Francis K. W. Wong & Arshad Ali Javed, 2018. "Relationships among Safety Climate, Safety Behavior, and Safety Outcomes for Ethnic Minority Construction Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Ramin Ansari & Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Roohollah Taherkhani & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Darius Migilinskas & Shohreh Moradi, 2022. "Performance Prediction of Construction Projects Based on the Causes of Claims: A System Dynamics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Yehiel Rosenfeld, 2009. "Cost of quality versus cost of non-quality in construction: the crucial balance," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 107-117.
    7. Nihan Yıldırım & Derya Gultekin & Doğan Tilkici & Dilek Ay, 2022. "An Institutional System Proposal for Advanced Occupational Safety and Labor Standards in the Turkish Construction Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-31, November.
    8. Roman Trach & Oleksandr Khomenko & Yuliia Trach & Oleksii Kulikov & Maksym Druzhynin & Nataliia Kishchak & Galyna Ryzhakova & Hanna Petrenko & Dmytro Prykhodko & Olha Obodіanska, 2023. "Application of Fuzzy Logic and SNA Tools to Assessment of Communication Quality between Construction Project Participants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Hossein Kiani & Seyed Hossein Hosseini & Farshid Abdi, 2018. "A Model to Investigate the Effect of Work Ethic Culture on Dynamics of Rework in Management of Projects," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 16(1), pages 40-59.
    10. Fatma Lestari & Riza Yosia Sunindijo & Martin Loosemore & Yuni Kusminanti & Baiduri Widanarko, 2020. "A Safety Climate Framework for Improving Health and Safety in the Indonesian Construction Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Abraham Park & Chen Yu Chang, 2013. "Impacts of Construction Events on the Project Equity Value of the Channel Tunnel Project," ERES eres2013_97, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    12. Jean-Charles Fiolet & Carl Haas & Keith Hipel, 2016. "Risk-chasing behaviour in on-site construction decisions," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(12), pages 845-858, December.
    13. Athanasios Lamprou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2022. "Identification and Evaluation of Success Criteria and Critical Success Factors in Project Success," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(2), pages 237-253, June.
    14. Fatemeh Mostofi & Vedat Toğan & Yunus Emre Ayözen & Onur Behzat Tokdemir, 2022. "Predicting the Impact of Construction Rework Cost Using an Ensemble Classifier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Knut Blind & Jakob Pohlisch & Anne Rainville, 2020. "Innovation and standardization as drivers of companies’ success in public procurement: an empirical analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 664-693, June.
    16. OMISORE, Segun & Ho, Manh-Toan, 2019. "Corporate Entrepreneurship, Strategy Formulation, and the Performance of the Nigerian Manufacturing Sector," Thesis Commons u39nc, Center for Open Science.
    17. Alessio Paolucci & Sergio Sangiorgi & Marco Giovanni Mariani, 2021. "Non-Technical Skills in Social Networks: The Spread of Safety Communication and Teamwork in a Warehouse," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13, January.
    18. Bhavana Pandit & Alex Albert & Yashwardhan Patil & Ahmed Jalil Al-Bayati, 2018. "Fostering Safety Communication among Construction Workers: Role of Safety Climate and Crew-Level Cohesion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Eze Emmanuel Chidiebere & Idiake John Ebhohimen & Ganiyu Bashir Olanrewaju, 2018. "Analysis of Rework Risk Triggers in the Nigerian Construction Industry," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 1778-1793, August.
    20. Jingfeng Yuan & Wen Yi & Mengyi Miao & Lei Zhang, 2018. "Evaluating the Impacts of Health, Social Network and Capital on Craft Efficiency and Productivity: A Case Study of Construction Workers in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9182-:d:440100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.