IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v27y2009i1p25-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communications and coordination in construction projects

Author

Listed:
  • Liaquat Hossain

Abstract

Coordination can be seen as a process of managing resources in an organized manner so that a higher degree of operational efficiency can be achieved for a given project. Social network matrices are constructed using different centrality measures. These measurements are used to explore the association between network centrality and coordination for a construction project. Network centrality affects the ability of an individual to coordinate the actions of others. The following questions guide this study: What is the effect of network centrality on coordination? How is the actor's ability to coordinate projects related to his or her structural position in the communications network? Multi-layered test designs were developed to explore this relationship in a project-based coordination of Dabhol Power Company Construction company and Azurix Corporation. There are three major findings from this analysis. First, centrally positioned actors show more coordinative activity. Second, the betweenness index of centrality is the most potent predicate for coordination. Last, the influence of an actor is associated with coordination more than the actor's prominence.

Suggested Citation

  • Liaquat Hossain, 2009. "Communications and coordination in construction projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 25-39.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:27:y:2009:i:1:p:25-39
    DOI: 10.1080/01446190802558923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190802558923
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446190802558923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Crowston, 1994. "Electronic communication and new organizational forms: A coordination theory approach," Working Paper Series 175, MIT Center for Coordination Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roman Trach & Oleksandr Khomenko & Yuliia Trach & Oleksii Kulikov & Maksym Druzhynin & Nataliia Kishchak & Galyna Ryzhakova & Hanna Petrenko & Dmytro Prykhodko & Olha Obodіanska, 2023. "Application of Fuzzy Logic and SNA Tools to Assessment of Communication Quality between Construction Project Participants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Odhigu Festus Onosakponome & Nazatul Shima Abdul Rani & Junaid M. Shaikh, 2011. "Cost Benefit Analysis of Procurement Systems and the Performance of Construction Projects in East Malaysia," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 2(5), pages 181-192.
    3. Ceric Anita & Ivic Ivona, 2021. "Network analysis of interconnections between theoretical concepts associated with principal–agent theory concerning construction projects," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 2450-2464, January.
    4. Ewelina Kania & Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina & Grzegorz Śladowski, 2020. "Communication and Information Flow in Polish Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raphael M. Malyankar & Nicholas V. Findler, 1998. "A Methodology for Modeling Coordination in Intelligent Agent Societies," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 317-345, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:27:y:2009:i:1:p:25-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.