IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i20p7462-d427649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Safety Climate Framework for Improving Health and Safety in the Indonesian Construction Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Fatma Lestari

    (Occupational Health & Safety Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Riza Yosia Sunindijo

    (Faculty of Built Environment, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Martin Loosemore

    (School of Built Environment, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Yuni Kusminanti

    (Occupational Safety, Health & Environmental Unit, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Baiduri Widanarko

    (Occupational Health & Safety Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

Abstract

The Indonesian construction industry is the second largest in Asia and accounts for over 30% of all occupational injuries in the country. Despite the size of the industry, there is a lack of safety research in this context. This research, therefore, aims to assess safety climate and develop a framework to improve safety in the Indonesian construction industry. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from 311 construction workers. The results show a moderately healthy safety climate but reflect numerous problems, particularly around perceived conflicts between production and safety logics, cost trade-offs being made against other competing project priorities, poor safety communication, poor working conditions, acceptance of poor safety as the norm, poor reporting and monitoring practices, poor training and a risky and unsupportive working environment which prevents workers from operating safely. Two new safety climate paradoxes are also revealed: contradictions between management communications and management practices; contradictions between worker concern for safety and their low sense of personal accountability and empowerment for acting to reduce these risks. A low locus of control over safety is also identified as a significant problem which is related to prevailing Indonesian cultural norms and poor safety policy implementation and potential conflicts between formal and informal safety norms, practices and procedures. Drawing on these findings, a new integrated framework of safety climate is presented to improve safety performance in the Indonesian construction industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatma Lestari & Riza Yosia Sunindijo & Martin Loosemore & Yuni Kusminanti & Baiduri Widanarko, 2020. "A Safety Climate Framework for Improving Health and Safety in the Indonesian Construction Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7462-:d:427649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7462/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7462/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Yunyan Jia & Steve Rowlinson & Martin Loosemore & Mengnan Xu & Baizhan Li & Alistair Gibb, 2017. "Institutions and institutional logics in construction safety management: the case of climatic heat stress," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 338-367, June.
    2. Ruwini Edirisinghe & Helen Lingard, 2016. "Exploring the potential for the use of video to communicate safety information to construction workers: case studies of organizational use," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 366-376, June.
    3. Natalie Galea & Abigail Powell & Martin Loosemore & Louise Chappell, 2015. "Designing robust and revisable policies for gender equality: lessons from the Australian construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5-6), pages 375-389, June.
    4. M. Loosemore & A. S. Y. Lam, 2004. "The locus of control: a determinant of opportunistic behaviour in construction health and safety," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 385-394.
    5. Rayyan Alsamadani & Matthew Hallowell & Amy Nicole Javernick-Will, 2013. "Measuring and modelling safety communication in small work crews in the US using social network analysis," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 568-579, June.
    6. Constantin BRATIANU & Georgiana Victoria BALANESCU, 2008. "Vision, mission and corporate values. A comparative analysis of the top 50 U.S. companies," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 3(3), Autumn.
    7. Helen Clare Lingard & Tracy Cooke & Nick Blismas, 2010. "Properties of group safety climate in construction: the development and evaluation of a typology," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(10), pages 1099-1112.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elham Faez & Seyed Abolfazl Zakerian & Kamal Azam & Kyle Hancock & John Rosecrance, 2021. "An Assessment of Ergonomics Climate and Its Association with Self-Reported Pain, Organizational Performance and Employee Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Fahad M. Alqahtani & Muhammad Abas & Mohammed Alkahtani & Mubashir Hayat & Aasia Farrukh, 2024. "Enhancing Sustainable Safety Practices in Construction: Insights from Cultural and Socio-Economic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Mario Fargnoli & Mara Lombardi, 2020. "NOSACQ-50 for Safety Climate Assessment in Agricultural Activities: A Case Study in Central Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huakang Liang & Ken-Yu Lin & Shoujian Zhang & Yikun Su, 2018. "The Impact of Coworkers’ Safety Violations on an Individual Worker: A Social Contagion Effect within the Construction Crew," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Vera Hoelscher & Ratna Khanijou & Daniela Pirani, 2023. "Changing informal institutions via mimesis: Gender equality in marriage proposals," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 52-67, January.
    3. Constantin BRATIANU & Ştefan STANCIU, 2009. "An empirical research on the messages transmitted by the universities mottos," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 4(2), Summer.
    4. Yuzhong Shen & Chuanjing Ju & Tas Yong Koh & Steve Rowlinson & Adrian J. Bridge, 2017. "The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Safety Climate and Individual Safety Behavior on Construction Sites," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Donna Bridges & Larissa Bamberry & Elizabeth Wulff & Branka Krivokapic‐Skoko, 2022. "“A trade of one's own”: The role of social and cultural capital in the success of women in male‐dominated occupations," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 371-387, March.
    6. Fanny Salignac & Natalie Galea & Abigail Powell, 2018. "Institutional entrepreneurs driving change: The case of gender equality in the Australian construction industry," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(1), pages 152-169, February.
    7. Carol K.H. Hon & Yulin Liu, 2016. "Exploring Typical and Atypical Safety Climate Perceptions of Practitioners in the Repair, Maintenance, Minor Alteration and Addition (RMAA) Sector in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, September.
    8. Liyaning (Maggie) Tang & Shaleeza Sohail & Emma Shorthouse & Larissa Sullivan & Matthew Williams, 2022. "Put Gender on the Tender in Australian Public Projects," World, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-11, September.
    9. Wei Tong Chen & Hew Cameron Merrett & Ying-Hua Huang & Shih Tong Lu & Wen Chun Sun & Yadi Li, 2019. "Exploring the Multilevel Perception of Safety Climate on Taiwanese Construction Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Natalie Galea & Louise Chappell, 2022. "Male‐dominated workplaces and the power of masculine privilege: A comparison of the Australian political and construction sectors," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1692-1711, September.
    11. Alessio Paolucci & Sergio Sangiorgi & Marco Giovanni Mariani, 2021. "Non-Technical Skills in Social Networks: The Spread of Safety Communication and Teamwork in a Warehouse," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Bhavana Pandit & Alex Albert & Yashwardhan Patil & Ahmed Jalil Al-Bayati, 2018. "Fostering Safety Communication among Construction Workers: Role of Safety Climate and Crew-Level Cohesion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Jingfeng Yuan & Wen Yi & Mengyi Miao & Lei Zhang, 2018. "Evaluating the Impacts of Health, Social Network and Capital on Craft Efficiency and Productivity: A Case Study of Construction Workers in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, February.
    14. Ran Gao & Albert P.C. Chan & Wahyudi P. Utama & Hafiz Zahoor, 2016. "Multilevel Safety Climate and Safety Performance in the Construction Industry: Development and Validation of a Top-Down Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    15. Mostafa Namian & Mohammadsoroush Tafazzoli & Ahmed Jalil Al-Bayati & Sharareh Kermanshachi, 2022. "Are Construction Managers from Mars and Workers from Venus? Exploring Differences in Construction Safety Perception of Two Key Field Stakeholders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Natalie Galea & Abigail Powell & Martin Loosemore & Louise Chappell, 2020. "The gendered dimensions of informal institutions in the Australian construction industry," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1214-1231, November.
    17. F. T. T. Phua, 2017. "Does the built-environment industry attract risk-taking individuals?," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 207-217, April.
    18. Wulandhari, Nur Baiti Ingga & Gölgeci, Ismail & Mishra, Nishikant & Sivarajah, Uthayasankar & Gupta, Suraksha, 2022. "Exploring the role of social capital mechanisms in cooperative resilience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 375-386.
    19. Zhang, Yixiang & Fu, Bowen, 2023. "Social trust contributes to the reduction of urban carbon dioxide emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    20. Giliberto Capano & Jun Jie Woo, 2017. "Resilience and robustness in policy design: a critical appraisal," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(3), pages 399-426, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7462-:d:427649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.