IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p8942-d435830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feeder Bus Accessibility Modeling and Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Shixiong Jiang

    (College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China)

  • Wei Guan

    (Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive Transport, Ministry of Transport, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Liu Yang

    (School of Transportation, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China)

  • Wenyi Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive Transport, Ministry of Transport, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

To improve first/last mile travel services between metro stations and communities, this study modeled and analyzed four kinds of feeder bus operation strategies in terms of travel time and accessibility. The analytical modeling was used to compare the travel times and the simulation experiments were used to compare the accessibilities of different operation strategies. The results showed that when the ratio between length and width of study area increases, the number of stops for the fixed route transit with fixed stops will increase. When the travel demand is low, the demand responsive transit with separate routes has the highest accessibility. When the travel demand is high, the fixed route transit with fixed stops provides the highest accessibility. In addition, the ratio of flows in two passenger directions has different influences on the four operation strategies. This study can provide guidance for feeder bus operation to improve public transportation attraction.

Suggested Citation

  • Shixiong Jiang & Wei Guan & Liu Yang & Wenyi Zhang, 2020. "Feeder Bus Accessibility Modeling and Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:8942-:d:435830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/8942/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/8942/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fan, Wenbo & Mei, Yu & Gu, Weihua, 2018. "Optimal design of intersecting bimodal transit networks in a grid city," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 203-226.
    2. Chandra, Shailesh & Quadrifoglio, Luca, 2013. "A model for estimating the optimal cycle length of demand responsive feeder transit services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-16.
    3. Hai Wang, 2019. "Routing and Scheduling for a Last-Mile Transportation System," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 131-147, February.
    4. Mavoa, Suzanne & Witten, Karen & McCreanor, Tim & O’Sullivan, David, 2012. "GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 15-22.
    5. Quadrifoglio, Luca & Dessouky, Maged M. & Ordóñez, Fernando, 2008. "A simulation study of demand responsive transit system design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 718-737, May.
    6. Chandra, Shailesh & Bari, Muhammad Ehsanul & Devarasetty, Prem Chand & Vadali, Sharada, 2013. "Accessibility evaluations of feeder transit services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 47-63.
    7. Di, Zhen & Yang, Lixing & Qi, Jianguo & Gao, Ziyou, 2018. "Transportation network design for maximizing flow-based accessibility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 209-238.
    8. Boisjoly, Geneviève & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2016. "Daily fluctuations in transit and job availability: A comparative assessment of time-sensitive accessibility measures," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 73-81.
    9. Hu, Yujie & Downs, Joni, 2019. "Measuring and visualizing place-based space-time job accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 278-288.
    10. Fayyaz, S. Kiavash & Liu, Xiaoyue Cathy & Porter, Richard J., 2017. "Dynamic transit accessibility and transit gap causality analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 27-39.
    11. Tilahun, Nebiyou & Fan, Yingling, 2014. "Transit and job accessibility: an empirical study of access to competitive clusters and regional growth strategies for enhancing transit accessibility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 17-25.
    12. Eric J. Miller, 2018. "Accessibility: measurement and application in transportation planning," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 551-555, September.
    13. Quadrifoglio, Luca & Li, Xiugang, 2009. "A methodology to derive the critical demand density for designing and operating feeder transit services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 922-935, December.
    14. Georgios Georgiadis & Ioannis Politis & Panagiotis Papaioannou, 2020. "How Does Operational Environment Influence Public Transport Effectiveness? Evidence from European Urban Bus Operators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Elżbieta Macioszek & Agata Kurek, 2020. "The Use of a Park and Ride System—A Case Study Based on the City of Cracow (Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-26, July.
    16. Tilahun, Nebiyou & Thakuriah, Piyushimita (Vonu) & Li, Moyin & Keita, Yaye, 2016. "Transit use and the work commute: Analyzing the role of last mile issues," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 359-368.
    17. Tong, Lu & Zhou, Xuesong & Miller, Harvey J., 2015. "Transportation network design for maximizing space–time accessibility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 555-576.
    18. Páez, Antonio & Scott, Darren M. & Morency, Catherine, 2012. "Measuring accessibility: positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 141-153.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zilong Zhao & Mengyuan Fang & Luliang Tang & Xue Yang & Zihan Kan & Qingquan Li, 2022. "The Impact of Community Shuttle Services on Traffic and Traffic-Related Air Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Kuo, Yong-Hong & Leung, Janny M.Y. & Yan, Yimo, 2023. "Public transport for smart cities: Recent innovations and future challenges," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1001-1026.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shi, Yuji & Blainey, Simon & Sun, Chao & Jing, Peng, 2020. "A literature review on accessibility using bibliometric analysis techniques," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Badia, Hugo & Jenelius, Erik, 2021. "Design and operation of feeder systems in the era of automated and electric buses," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 146-172.
    3. Chandra, Shailesh & Bari, Muhammad Ehsanul & Devarasetty, Prem Chand & Vadali, Sharada, 2013. "Accessibility evaluations of feeder transit services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 47-63.
    4. Xu, Wangtu (Ato) & Li, Yongling & Wang, Hui, 2016. "Transit accessibility for commuters considering the demand elasticities of distance and transfer," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 138-156.
    5. Kim, Myungseob (Edward) & Schonfeld, Paul, 2015. "Maximizing net benefits for conventional and flexible bus services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 116-133.
    6. Moyano, Amparo & Martínez, Héctor S. & Coronado, José M., 2018. "From network to services: A comparative accessibility analysis of the Spanish high-speed rail system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 51-60.
    7. El Murr, Karl & Boisjoly, Genevieve & Waygood, E.O.D., 2023. "Measuring accessibility to parks: Analyzing the relationship between self-reported and calculated measures," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. Kim, Junghwan & Lee, Bumsoo, 2019. "More than travel time: New accessibility index capturing the connectivity of transit services," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 8-18.
    9. Rich, Jeppe & Seshadri, Ravi & Jomeh, Ali Jamal & Clausen, Sofus Rasmus, 2023. "Fixed routing or demand-responsive? Agent-based modelling of autonomous first and last mile services in light-rail systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    10. Rick Grahn & Sean Qian & Chris Hendrickson, 2023. "Optimizing first- and last-mile public transit services leveraging transportation network companies (TNC)," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 2049-2076, October.
    11. Tang, Xindi & Yang, Jie & Lin, Xi & He, Fang & Si, Jinhua, 2023. "Dynamic operations of an integrated mobility service system of fixed-route transits and flexible electric buses," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    12. Arbex, Renato & Cunha, Claudio B., 2020. "Estimating the influence of crowding and travel time variability on accessibility to jobs in a large public transport network using smart card big data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    13. Qiu, Feng & Shen, Jinxing & Zhang, Xuechi & An, Chengchuan, 2015. "Demi-flexible operating policies to promote the performance of public transit in low-demand areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 215-230.
    14. Stępniak, Marcin & Pritchard, John P. & Geurs, Karst T. & Goliszek, Sławomir, 2019. "The impact of temporal resolution on public transport accessibility measurement: Review and case study in Poland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 8-24.
    15. Xin Li & Wanying Liu & Jingyuan Qiao & Yanhao Li & Jia Hu, 2023. "An Enhanced Semi-Flexible Transit Service with Introducing Meeting Points," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 487-527, September.
    16. Kim, Hyun & Lee, Keumsook & Park, Jong Soo & Song, Yena, 2018. "Transit network expansion and accessibility implications: A case study of Gwangju metropolitan area, South Korea," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 544-553.
    17. Pei, Mingyang & Lin, Peiqun & Du, Jun & Li, Xiaopeng & Chen, Zhiwei, 2021. "Vehicle dispatching in modular transit networks: A mixed-integer nonlinear programming model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    18. Li, Xin & Wang, Tianqi & Xu, Weihan & Li, Huaiyue & Yuan, Yun, 2022. "A novel model and algorithm for designing an eco-oriented demand responsive transit (DRT) system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Jingming Liu & Xianhui Hou & Chuyu Xia & Xiang Kang & Yujun Zhou, 2021. "Examining the Spatial Coordination between Metrorail Accessibility and Urban Spatial Form in the Context of Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Zahra Navidi & Nicole Ronald & Stephan Winter, 2018. "Comparison between ad-hoc demand responsive and conventional transit: a simulation study," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 147-167, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:8942-:d:435830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.