IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8510-d428426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Abusive Supervision and Motivational Preference on Employees’ Innovative Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Tian

    (School of Management, Xiamen University, No. 422 Siming South Road, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Yan Peng

    (School of Management, Xiamen University, No. 422 Siming South Road, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Xing Zhou

    (School of Management, Xiamen University, No. 422 Siming South Road, Xiamen 361005, China)

Abstract

Individual innovative behavior has an important relationship with the sustainable development of an organization. Thus, mostly drawing on social cognitive theory, this study examined the relationship between abusive supervision and employees’ innovative behavior, focusing on the mediating role of creative self-efficacy and the moderating role of motivational preference. In an analysis of time-lagged data from three technological, innovation-based enterprises in Shenzhen, this study found that abusive supervision was negatively related to employees’ innovative behavior and that this relationship was mediated by creative self-efficacy. Moreover, motivational preference was found to moderate this relationship as well as that between abusive supervision and creative self-efficacy. Employees with higher levels of motivational preference (i.e., intrinsic motivational preference weighs more than extrinsic motivational preference) are more vulnerable to abusive supervision, causing lower creative self-efficacy performance and less innovative behavior. Alternately, employees with lower levels of motivational preference (i.e., extrinsic motivational preference weighs more than intrinsic motivational preference) are less vulnerable to abusive supervision, thus resulting in a weaker negative relationship between abusive supervision and their creative self-efficacy and innovative behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Tian & Yan Peng & Xing Zhou, 2020. "The Effects of Abusive Supervision and Motivational Preference on Employees’ Innovative Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8510-:d:428426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8510/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8510/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Faridun Bozorov & Sanghyun Sung, 2019. "Paternalistic Leadership and Innovative Behavior: Psychological Empowerment as a Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Bao Cheng & Xing Zhou & Gongxing Guo & Kezhen Yang, 2020. "Perceived Overqualification and Cyberloafing: A Moderated-Mediation Model Based on Equity Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 565-577, July.
    3. Liu, Dong & Jiang, Kaifeng & Shalley, Christina E. & Keem, Sejin & Zhou, Jing, 2016. "Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 236-263.
    4. Yi Tu & Xin Lu, 2013. "Erratum to: How Ethical Leadership Influence Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior: A Perspective of Intrinsic Motivation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 457-457, August.
    5. Hui Li & Nazir Sajjad & Qun Wang & Asadullah Muhammad Ali & Zeb Khaqan & Shafi Amina, 2019. "Influence of Transformational Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior in Sustainable Organizations: Test of Mediation and Moderation Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Huseyin Arasli & Hasan Evrim Arici & Ezel Kole, 2020. "Constructive Leadership and Employee Innovative Behaviors: A Serial Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Rajagopal, 2014. "Organizations and Innovation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 3, pages 58-86, Palgrave Macmillan.
    8. Faisal Mahmood & Faisal Qadeer & Zaheer Abbas & Muhammadi & Iqtidar Hussain & Maria Saleem & Akhlaq Hussain & Jaffar Aman, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Employees’ Negative Behaviors under Abusive Supervision: A Multilevel Insight," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Mirko Duradoni & Annamaria Di Fabio, 2019. "Intrapreneurial Self-Capital and Sustainable Innovative Behavior within Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, January.
    10. Javed, Basharat & Abdullah, Iqra & Zaffar, Muhmmad Adeel & Haque, Adnan ul & Rubab, Ume, 2019. "Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(4), pages 554-571, July.
    11. Xi Yu & Krishna P. Paudel & Dongmei Li & Xiaolei Xiong & Yanyu Gong, 2020. "Sustainable Collaborative Innovation between Research Institutions and Seed Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 2010. "Building Sustainable Organizations: The Human Factor," Research Papers 2017r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    13. Wang, Chung-Jen & Tsai, Huei-Ting & Tsai, Ming-Tien, 2014. "Linking transformational leadership and employee creativity in the hospitality industry: The influences of creative role identity, creative self-efficacy, and job complexity," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 79-89.
    14. Qiwei Zhou & Qian Li & Shiyang Gong, 2019. "How Job Autonomy Promotes Employee’s Sustainable Development? A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-14, November.
    15. Yucheng Zhang & Zhenyu Liao, 2015. "Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 959-987, December.
    16. Dhar, Rajib Lochan, 2016. "Ethical leadership and its impact on service innovative behavior: The role of LMX and job autonomy," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 139-148.
    17. Vincent Rousseau & Caroline Aubé, 2018. "When Leaders Stifle Innovation in Work Teams: The Role of Abusive Supervision," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 651-664, September.
    18. Servet Nasifoglu Elidemir & Ali Ozturen & Steven W. Bayighomog, 2020. "Innovative Behaviors, Employee Creativity, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Moderated Mediation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Li Yi & Md. Aftab Uddin & Anupam Kumar Das & Monowar Mahmood & Shanewaz Mahmood Sohel, 2019. "Do Transformational Leaders Engage Employees in Sustainable Innovative Work Behaviour? Perspective from a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Siyuan Miao & Jaehoon Rhee & In Jun, 2020. "How Much Does Extrinsic Motivation or Intrinsic Motivation Affect Job Engagement or Turnover Intention? A Comparison Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ki-Seoung Lee & Yoon-Seo Kim & Hyoung-Chul Shin, 2023. "Effect of Hotel Employees’ Organizational Politics Perception on Organizational Silence, Organizational Cynicism, and Innovation Resistance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Servet Nasifoglu Elidemir & Ali Ozturen & Steven W. Bayighomog, 2020. "Innovative Behaviors, Employee Creativity, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Moderated Mediation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Jue Wang & Hae-Ryong Kim & Byung-Jik Kim, 2021. "From Ethical Leadership to Team Creativity: The Mediating Role of Shared Leadership and the Moderating Effect of Leader–Member Exchange Differentiation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Eglė Staniškienė & Urtė Ciganė, 2020. "Sustainable HRM as a Driver for Innovative Work Behaviour: Do Respect, Openness, and Continuity Matter? The Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Hanan S. AlEssa & Christopher M. Durugbo, 2022. "Systematic review of innovative work behavior concepts and contributions," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 1171-1208, December.
    5. Huseyin Arasli & Hasan Evrim Arici & Ezel Kole, 2020. "Constructive Leadership and Employee Innovative Behaviors: A Serial Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Yuan Jing Luo & Yan Ping Li & Jing Du, 2020. "Coping with Supervisor Sanctions During Organizational Change: Core Members’ Active Change Behavior and Followers’ Middle Way Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-12, August.
    7. Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Li, Hua & Li, Fuli & Chen, Tingting, 2018. "A motivational–cognitive model of creativity and the role of autonomy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 179-188.
    9. Jol Stoffers & Beatrice van der Heijden & Ilse Schrijver, 2019. "Towards a Sustainable Model of Innovative Work Behaviors’ Enhancement: The Mediating Role of Employability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    10. Qiuxiang Wen & Yingxuan Wu & Jing Long, 2021. "Influence of Ethical Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Behavior: The Role of Organization-Based Self-Esteem and Flexible Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    11. Yogesh Upadhyay & Dharmendra Kumar, 2020. "Leader–Member Exchange, Psychological Capital and Employees’ Creativity," Vision, , vol. 24(4), pages 406-418, December.
    12. Tantawy, Maha & Herbert, Kendall & McNally, Jeffrey J. & Mengel, Thomas & Piperopoulos, Panagiotis & Foord, David, 2021. "Bringing creativity back to entrepreneurship education: Creative self-efficacy, creative process engagement, and entrepreneurial intentions," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).
    13. Leonel Prieto & Muhammad Ruhul Amin & Arman Canatay, 2022. "Examining Social Sustainability in Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-43, September.
    14. Xin Liu & Yan Huang & Jaehyoung Kim & Sanggyun Na, 2023. "How Ethical Leadership Cultivates Innovative Work Behaviors in Employees? Psychological Safety, Work Engagement and Openness to Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Xiu Jin & Chenglin Qing & Shanyue Jin, 2022. "Ethical Leadership and Innovative Behavior: Mediating Role of Voice Behavior and Moderated Mediation Role of Psychological Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Gu, Huimin & Duverger, Philippe & Yu, Larry, 2017. "Can innovative behavior be led by management? A study from the lodging business," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 144-157.
    17. Beili Li & Xu Fan & Susana Álvarez-Otero & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Ubaldo Comite & Jacob Cherian & László Vasa, 2021. "CSR and Workplace Autonomy as Enablers of Workplace Innovation in SMEs through Employees: Extending the Boundary Conditions of Self-Determination Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Soila Lemmetty & Vlad Petre Glăveanu & Kaija Collin & Panu Forsman, 2020. "(Un)Sustainable Creativity? Different Manager-Employee Perspectives in the Finnish Technology Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Diego Norena-Chavez & Ruben Guevara, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Passion and Self-Efficacy as Factors Explaining Innovative Behavior: A Mediation Model," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 352-373.
    20. Jeou-Shyan Horng & Chung-Jen Wang & Chih-Hsing Liu & Sheng-Fang Chou & Chang-Yen Tsai, 2016. "The Role of Sustainable Service Innovation in Crafting the Vision of the Hospitality Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8510-:d:428426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.