IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8453-d427709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consideration of the Door Opening Process in Pedestrian Flow: Experiments on Door Opening Direction, Door Handle Type, and Limited Visibility

Author

Listed:
  • Jong-Yeong Son

    (School of Architectural, Civil, Environmental and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea)

  • Young-Hoon Bae

    (School of Architectural, Civil, Environmental and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea)

  • Young-Chan Kim

    (Department of Fire and Disaster Prevention Engineering, Changshin University, Changwon 51352, Korea)

  • Ryun-Seok Oh

    (Department of Architectural and Fire Protection Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea)

  • Won-Hwa Hong

    (School of Architectural, Civil, Environmental and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea)

  • Jun-Ho Choi

    (Department of Architectural and Fire Protection Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea)

Abstract

The door is a section prone to bottlenecks and is an important element in the study of pedestrian flow. Therefore, characteristics of doors (e.g., width, location, and the distance between doors) have been taken into consideration in the existing literature related to doors. According to several previous studies, it appears likely that the door opening process (DOP) influences pedestrian flow. However, the number of studies examining the DOP remains small. Therefore, to enhance understanding of pedestrian flow, we examined two door characteristics that could affect the DOP (opening direction (swing door: push or pull) and handle type (knob, lever, and panic bar)) and limited visibility. We conducted a walking experiment to take all variables (10 cases; 10 participants per case) into account. Statistical analysis was performed on the difference in movement times, and the results were as follows: (1) inclusion of the DOP affected pedestrian flow; (2) when visibility was limited, movement times with DOP inclusion increased significantly regardless of the door opening direction and handle type; (3) when the door opening direction was ‘push’, regardless of limited visibility and door handle type, movement times with DOP inclusion were significantly lower; and (4) the door handle type did not result in any significant difference in movement times with DOP inclusion. In addition, we calculated the delay time based on the experiment results, to include the DOP in pedestrian flow (push 1.96–2.88 s, pull 3.91–4.43 s; limited visibility: push 7.38–12.56 s, and pull 12.88–16.35 s). The results of this study could be used as basic data for the development of codes/regulations, engineering guidance, and egress models for doors.

Suggested Citation

  • Jong-Yeong Son & Young-Hoon Bae & Young-Chan Kim & Ryun-Seok Oh & Won-Hwa Hong & Jun-Ho Choi, 2020. "Consideration of the Door Opening Process in Pedestrian Flow: Experiments on Door Opening Direction, Door Handle Type, and Limited Visibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8453-:d:427709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8453/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8453/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liao, Weichen & Tordeux, Antoine & Seyfried, Armin & Chraibi, Mohcine & Drzycimski, Kevin & Zheng, Xiaoping & Zhao, Ying, 2016. "Measuring the steady state of pedestrian flow in bottleneck experiments," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 461(C), pages 248-261.
    2. Khamis, Nurulaqilla & Selamat, Hazlina & Ismail, Fatimah Sham & Lutfy, Omar Farouq & Haniff, Mohamad Fadzli & Nordin, Ili Najaa Aimi Mohd, 2020. "Optimized exit door locations for a safer emergency evacuation using crowd evacuation model and artificial bee colony optimization," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Dirk Helbing & Illés Farkas & Tamás Vicsek, 2000. "Simulating dynamical features of escape panic," Nature, Nature, vol. 407(6803), pages 487-490, September.
    4. Nagai, Ryoichi & Fukamachi, Masahiro & Nagatani, Takashi, 2006. "Evacuation of crawlers and walkers from corridor through an exit," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 367(C), pages 449-460.
    5. Chen, Siyuan & Fu, Libi & Fang, Jie & Yang, Panyun, 2019. "The effect of obstacle layouts on pedestrian flow in corridors: An experimental study," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    6. Song, Xiao & Ma, Liang & Ma, Yaofei & Yang, Chen & Ji, Hang, 2016. "Selfishness- and Selflessness-based models of pedestrian room evacuation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 447(C), pages 455-466.
    7. Nicolas, Alexandre & Bouzat, Sebastián & Kuperman, Marcelo N., 2017. "Pedestrian flows through a narrow doorway: Effect of individual behaviours on the global flow and microscopic dynamics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 30-43.
    8. Dirk Helbing & Lubos Buzna & Anders Johansson & Torsten Werner, 2005. "Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 1-24, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Yanghui & Bi, Yubo & Ren, Xiangxia & Huang, Shenshi & Gao, Wei, 2023. "Experimental study on the impact of a stationary pedestrian obstacle at the exit on evacuation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 626(C).
    2. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid, 2018. "Crowd behaviour and motion: Empirical methods," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 253-294.
    3. Liu, Xuan & Song, Weiguo & Zhang, Jun, 2009. "Extraction and quantitative analysis of microscopic evacuation characteristics based on digital image processing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(13), pages 2717-2726.
    4. Song, Xiao & Han, Daolin & Sun, Jinghan & Zhang, Zenghui, 2018. "A data-driven neural network approach to simulate pedestrian movement," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 827-844.
    5. Shi, Xiaomeng & Xue, Shuqi & Feliciani, Claudio & Shiwakoti, Nirajan & Lin, Junkai & Li, Dawei & Ye, Zhirui, 2021. "Verifying the applicability of a pedestrian simulation model to reproduce the effect of exit design on egress flow under normal and emergency conditions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 562(C).
    6. Tian, Huan-huan & Wei, Yan-fang & Dong, Li-yun & Xue, Yu & Zheng, Rong-sen, 2018. "Resolution of conflicts in cellular automaton evacuation model with the game-theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 991-1006.
    7. Wang, Weili & Zhang, Jingjing & Li, Haicheng & Xie, Qimiao, 2020. "Experimental study on unidirectional pedestrian flows in a corridor with a fixed obstacle and a temporary obstacle," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    8. Kefan Xie & Benbu Liang & Yu Song & Xueqin Dong, 2019. "Analysis of Walking-Edge Effect in Train Station Evacuation Scenarios: A Sustainable Transportation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Miyagawa, Daiki & Ichinose, Genki, 2020. "Cellular automaton model with turning behavior in crowd evacuation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 549(C).
    10. Shi, Xiaomeng & Ye, Zhirui & Shiwakoti, Nirajan & Tang, Dounan & Lin, Junkai, 2019. "Examining effect of architectural adjustment on pedestrian crowd flow at bottleneck," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 522(C), pages 350-364.
    11. Jie Xu & Yao Ning & Heng Wei & Wei Xie & Jianyuan Guo & Limin Jia & Yong Qin, 2015. "Route Choice in Subway Station during Morning Peak Hours: A Case of Guangzhou Subway," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-8, March.
    12. Yue, Hao & Zhang, Junyao & Chen, Wenxin & Wu, Xinsen & Zhang, Xu & Shao, Chunfu, 2021. "Simulation of the influence of spatial obstacles on evacuation pedestrian flow in walking facilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    13. Cao, Shuchao & Lian, Liping & Chen, Mingyi & Yao, Ming & Song, Weiguo & Fang, Zhiming, 2018. "Investigation of difference of fundamental diagrams in pedestrian flow," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 661-670.
    14. Lasse Pedersen, 2009. "When Everyone Runs for the Exit," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 5(4), pages 177-199, December.
    15. Shiwakoti, Nirajan & Sarvi, Majid, 2013. "Understanding pedestrian crowd panic: a review on model organisms approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 12-17.
    16. Krbálek, Milan & Hrabák, Pavel & Bukáček, Marek, 2018. "Pedestrian headways — Reflection of territorial social forces," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 38-49.
    17. Dirk Helbing & Pratik Mukerji, "undated". "Crowd Disasters as Systemic Failures: Analysis of the Love Parade Disaster," Working Papers ETH-RC-12-010, ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design.
    18. Huan-Huan, Tian & Li-Yun, Dong & Yu, Xue, 2015. "Influence of the exits’ configuration on evacuation process in a room without obstacle," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 420(C), pages 164-178.
    19. Shi, Zhigang & Zhang, Jun & Shang, Zhigang & Fan, Minghao & Song, Weiguo, 2022. "The effect of obstacle layouts on regulating luggage-laden pedestrian flow through bottlenecks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 608(P1).
    20. Lian, Liping & Song, Weiguo & Yuen, Kwok Kit Richard & Telesca, Luciano, 2018. "Investigating the time evolution of some parameters describing inflow processes of pedestrians in a room," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 507(C), pages 77-88.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8453-:d:427709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.