IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v634y2024ics0378437123009986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on mechanism and simulation for avoiding behavior of individual pedestrian

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Zhiyang
  • Yue, Hao
  • Zhang, Ning
  • Zhang, Xu

Abstract

The research on the mechanism of avoiding behaviors and microscopic simulations in the scenario of individual pedestrian are carried out. Controlled experiments on avoidance of obstacle are conducted to analyze the microscopic characteristics of pedestrian behaviors and provide experimental evidence. Common features concerning movement parameters, such as velocity and spatial position, are summarized to construct the common scenario for avoidance for further quantitative analysis of avoiding behaviors. Walking power-consumption is introduced to describe the influences of distance and body-rotation on route choice. Further, walking comfortability and walking efficiency are proposed based on walking power-consumption to describe the long-term and short-term utilities of decision making respectively. Preference for comfortability and efficiency is discussed based on spatial distance to the target and inertia coefficient, which is introduced to describe the laziness of pedestrian. Then the process of decision making is modeled as a dynamic process of pedestrian balancing long-term and short-term benefits, based on which a microscopic simulation model is established to simulate the avoiding behaviors of pedestrian and reproduce the microscopic characteristics. The results show that, the phenomenon of delayed-avoidance exists in the avoidance of obstacle, which means that pedestrians make no instant reactions when encountering with an obstacle, but keep the current velocity and walk for some distance. Also, walking efficiency is found to be decreasing when the current velocity deviates from the target. Furthermore, moving behaviors and route choices of pedestrian are largely relevant to the level of inertia and walking preference. According to different levels of inertia, the moving microscopic characteristics and walking patterns of individual pedestrian can be divided into three types of moving strategies in avoidance. Specifically, pedestrian of lower inertia will focus more on walking efficiency, and are more active in reaction to the obstacle. Pedestrian in higher level of inertia tends to be short-sighted and lazier in route choice. Besides, the inertia of pedestrian is found to make pedestrian focus on short-term and immediate rather than long-term and global benefits in route choice.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Zhiyang & Yue, Hao & Zhang, Ning & Zhang, Xu, 2024. "Research on mechanism and simulation for avoiding behavior of individual pedestrian," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 634(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:634:y:2024:i:c:s0378437123009986
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2023.129443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437123009986
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2023.129443?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Peng & Ma, Jian & Liu, Tian Yang & Ran, Tong & Si, You Liang & Wu, Fan Yu & Wang, Guo Yuan, 2017. "An experimental study of the impact of an obstacle on the escape efficiency by using mice under high competition," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 482(C), pages 228-242.
    2. Yue, Hao & Guan, Hongzhi & Shao, Chunfu & Zhang, Xu, 2011. "Simulation of pedestrian evacuation with asymmetrical exits layout," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(2), pages 198-207.
    3. Jia, Xiaolu & Feliciani, Claudio & Yanagisawa, Daichi & Nishinari, Katsuhiro, 2019. "Experimental study on the evading behavior of individual pedestrians when confronting with an obstacle in a corridor," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 531(C).
    4. Hoogendoorn, Serge P. & van Wageningen-Kessels, Femke L.M. & Daamen, Winnie & Duives, Dorine C., 2014. "Continuum modelling of pedestrian flows: From microscopic principles to self-organised macroscopic phenomena," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 416(C), pages 684-694.
    5. Dirk Helbing & Lubos Buzna & Anders Johansson & Torsten Werner, 2005. "Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Dirk Helbing & Illés Farkas & Tamás Vicsek, 2000. "Simulating dynamical features of escape panic," Nature, Nature, vol. 407(6803), pages 487-490, September.
    7. Guo, Ren-Yong & Huang, Hai-Jun & Wong, S.C., 2012. "Route choice in pedestrian evacuation under conditions of good and zero visibility: Experimental and simulation results," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 669-686.
    8. Frank, G.A. & Dorso, C.O., 2011. "Room evacuation in the presence of an obstacle," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(11), pages 2135-2145.
    9. Burstedde, C & Klauck, K & Schadschneider, A & Zittartz, J, 2001. "Simulation of pedestrian dynamics using a two-dimensional cellular automaton," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 507-525.
    10. Tang, Ming & Jia, Hongfei & Ran, Bin & Li, Jun, 2016. "Analysis of the pedestrian arching at bottleneck based on a bypassing behavior model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 453(C), pages 242-258.
    11. Hoogendoorn, S. P. & Bovy, P. H. L., 2004. "Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 169-190, February.
    12. Chen, Siyuan & Fu, Libi & Fang, Jie & Yang, Panyun, 2019. "The effect of obstacle layouts on pedestrian flow in corridors: An experimental study," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    13. Varas, A. & Cornejo, M.D. & Mainemer, D. & Toledo, B. & Rogan, J. & Muñoz, V. & Valdivia, J.A., 2007. "Cellular automaton model for evacuation process with obstacles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 382(2), pages 631-642.
    14. Saberi, Meead & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Sobhani, Amir, 2015. "Spatial fluctuations of pedestrian velocities in bidirectional streams: Exploring the effects of self-organization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 434(C), pages 120-128.
    15. Zheng, Ying & Li, Xingang & Zhu, Nuo & Jia, Bin & Jiang, Rui, 2018. "Evacuation dynamics with smoking diffusion in three dimension based on an extended Floor-Field model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 507(C), pages 414-426.
    16. Liang, Mengdi & Xu, Jie & Jia, Limin & Qin, Yong, 2020. "An improved model of passenger merging in a Y-shaped passage," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    17. Yue, Hao & Zhang, Junyao & Chen, Wenxin & Wu, Xinsen & Zhang, Xu & Shao, Chunfu, 2021. "Simulation of the influence of spatial obstacles on evacuation pedestrian flow in walking facilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    18. Wang, Weili & Zhang, Jingjing & Li, Haicheng & Xie, Qimiao, 2020. "Experimental study on unidirectional pedestrian flows in a corridor with a fixed obstacle and a temporary obstacle," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    19. Jia-Bei Zeng & Biao Leng & Zhang Xiong & Zheng Qin, 2011. "Pedestrian Dynamics In A Two-Dimensional Complex Scenario Using A Local View Floor Field Model," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(08), pages 775-803.
    20. Yue, Hao & Hao, Herui & Chen, Xiaoming & Shao, Chunfu, 2007. "Simulation of pedestrian flow on square lattice based on cellular automata model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 384(2), pages 567-588.
    21. Yamamoto, Hiroki & Yanagisawa, Daichi & Feliciani, Claudio & Nishinari, Katsuhiro, 2019. "Body-rotation behavior of pedestrians for collision avoidance in passing and cross flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 486-510.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yue, Hao & Zhang, Junyao & Chen, Wenxin & Wu, Xinsen & Zhang, Xu & Shao, Chunfu, 2021. "Simulation of the influence of spatial obstacles on evacuation pedestrian flow in walking facilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    2. Leng, Biao & Wang, Jianyuan & Xiong, Zhang, 2015. "Pedestrian simulations in hexagonal cell local field model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 438(C), pages 532-543.
    3. Wang, Weili & Zhang, Jingjing & Li, Haicheng & Xie, Qimiao, 2020. "Experimental study on unidirectional pedestrian flows in a corridor with a fixed obstacle and a temporary obstacle," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    4. Huo, Feizhou & Li, Chao & Li, Yufei & Lv, Wei & Ma, Yaping, 2022. "An extended model for describing pedestrian evacuation considering the impact of obstacles on the visual view," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 604(C).
    5. Huang, Rong & Zhao, Xuan & Zhou, Chenyu & Kong, Lingchen & Liu, Chengqing & Yu, Qiang, 2022. "Static floor field construction and fine discrete cellular automaton model: Algorithms, simulations and insights," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 606(C).
    6. Miyagawa, Daiki & Ichinose, Genki, 2020. "Cellular automaton model with turning behavior in crowd evacuation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 549(C).
    7. Leng, Biao & Wang, Jianyuan & Zhao, Wenyuan & Xiong, Zhang, 2014. "An extended floor field model based on regular hexagonal cells for pedestrian simulation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 402(C), pages 119-133.
    8. Guo, Ren-Yong, 2014. "Simulation of spatial and temporal separation of pedestrian counter flow through a bottleneck," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 415(C), pages 428-439.
    9. Li, Shengnan & Li, Xingang & Qu, Yunchao & Jia, Bin, 2015. "Block-based floor field model for pedestrian’s walking through corner," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 432(C), pages 337-353.
    10. Yu Song & Jia Liu & Qian Liu, 2021. "Dynamic Decision-Making Process of Evacuees during Post-Earthquake Evacuation near an Automatic Flap Barrier Gate System: A Broken Windows Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Liu, Qian, 2018. "The effect of dedicated exit on the evacuation of heterogeneous pedestrians," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 305-323.
    12. Li, Maosheng & Shu, Panpan & Xiao, Yao & Wang, Pu, 2021. "Modeling detour decision combined the tactical and operational layer based on perceived density," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 574(C).
    13. Haghani, Milad, 2021. "The knowledge domain of crowd dynamics: Anatomy of the field, pioneering studies, temporal trends, influential entities and outside-domain impact," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 580(C).
    14. Shi, Xiaomeng & Ye, Zhirui & Shiwakoti, Nirajan & Tang, Dounan & Lin, Junkai, 2019. "Examining effect of architectural adjustment on pedestrian crowd flow at bottleneck," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 522(C), pages 350-364.
    15. Abdelghany, Ahmed & Abdelghany, Khaled & Mahmassani, Hani, 2016. "A hybrid simulation-assignment modeling framework for crowd dynamics in large-scale pedestrian facilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 159-176.
    16. Zhou, Zi-Xuan & Nakanishi, Wataru & Asakura, Yasuo, 2021. "Route choice in the pedestrian evacuation: Microscopic formulation based on visual information," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 562(C).
    17. Fu, Zhijian & Yang, Lizhong & Chen, Yanqiu & Zhu, Kongjin & Zhu, Shi, 2013. "The effect of individual tendency on crowd evacuation efficiency under inhomogeneous exit attraction using a static field modified FFCA model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(23), pages 6090-6099.
    18. Zhou, Zi-Xuan & Nakanishi, Wataru & Asakura, Yasuo, 2021. "Data-driven framework for the adaptive exit selection problem in pedestrian flow: Visual information based heuristics approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    19. Gao, Jin & He, Jun & Gong, Jinghai, 2020. "A simplified method to provide evacuation guidance in a multi-exit building under emergency," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    20. Johansson, Fredrik & Peterson, Anders & Tapani, Andreas, 2015. "Waiting pedestrians in the social force model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 419(C), pages 95-107.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:634:y:2024:i:c:s0378437123009986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.