IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i16p6378-d396012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Sustainability Indicators for Employee-Activity Based Production Process Using Fuzzy Delphi Method

Author

Listed:
  • Chiuhsiang Joe Lin

    (Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan)

  • Tariku Tamiru Belis

    (Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan)

  • Dino Caesaron

    (Department of Industrial Engineering-School of Industrial and System Engineering Telkom University, Jl. Telekomunikasi Terusan Buah Batu, Sukapura, Dayeuhkolot, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

  • Bernard C. Jiang

    (Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan)

  • Tsai Chi Kuo

    (Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan)

Abstract

Production process sustainability refers to a manufacturing system in which manufacturing industries produce products in a sustainable way. In recent years, sustainability has become a major concern and challenge for manufacturing systems because of growing consciousness of the effects of their activities on the environment, society, and economy. Different organizational reports and the academic literature have proposed indicators of sustainable manufacturing that help to measure product and process sustainability. However, little of the previous research is related to employee-activity based indicators for production process sustainability. To bridge the gap, this study identified a set of indicators of production process sustainability based on direct and indirect impacts of manufacturing activities on employees, who are key resources in the entire production process, for efficiently applying a sustainability perspective. In addition, the paper provides an evaluation model for selecting relatively important indicators based on expert opinions. A fuzzy Delphi method was applied for the screening process of the decision makers (experts). A Delphi questionnaire prepared with a nine-point linguistic scale corresponding to respective linguistic variables was utilized to assess expert opinions on the importance of each indicator. These expert opinions were aggregated for each indicator by using an adopted algorithm that considers the degree of importance allocated to the decision makers, and the similarity and distance among decision maker opinions. Lastly, the key employee-activity based indicators were chosen based on the threshold value set.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiuhsiang Joe Lin & Tariku Tamiru Belis & Dino Caesaron & Bernard C. Jiang & Tsai Chi Kuo, 2020. "Development of Sustainability Indicators for Employee-Activity Based Production Process Using Fuzzy Delphi Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-31, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6378-:d:396012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6378/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6378/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Shih-Yuan & Perng, Yeng-Horng & Ho, Yu-Feng, 2013. "The effect of renewable energy application on Taiwan buildings: What are the challenges and strategies for solar energy exploitation?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 92-106.
    2. Eleonora Bottani & Maria Carmen Gentilotti & Marta Rinaldi, 2017. "A Fuzzy Logic-Based Tool for the Assessment of Corporate Sustainability: A Case Study in the Food Machinery Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29, April.
    3. Wagner Cezar Lucato & José Carlos da Silva Santos & Athos Paulo Tadeu Pacchini, 2017. "Measuring the Sustainability of a Manufacturing Process: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Karl Widerquist, 2018. "The Bottom Line," Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee, in: A Critical Analysis of Basic Income Experiments for Researchers, Policymakers, and Citizens, chapter 0, pages 93-98, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Ivo Hristov & Antonio Chirico, 2019. "The Role of Sustainability Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in Implementing Sustainable Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Miguel F. Salvado & Susana G. Azevedo & João C. O. Matias & Luís M. Ferreira, 2015. "Proposal of a Sustainability Index for the Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-32, February.
    7. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    8. Hossam A. Kishawy & Hussien Hegab & Elsadig Saad, 2018. "Design for Sustainable Manufacturing: Approach, Implementation, and Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Chiuhsiang Joe Lin & Tariku Tamiru Belis & Tsai Chi Kuo, 2019. "Ergonomics-Based Factors or Criteria for the Evaluation of Sustainable Product Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Geist, Monica R., 2010. "Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: A comparison of two studies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 147-154, May.
    11. Liyuan Zhang & Xuanhua Xu & Li Tao, 2013. "Some Similarity Measures for Triangular Fuzzy Number and Their Applications in Multiple Criteria Group Decision-Making," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-7, March.
    12. Hamed Taherdoost, 2016. "Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research," Post-Print hal-02546799, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee-Chun Wu & Kuei-Lun Chang & Tung-Lin Chuang & You-Shyang Chen & Jung-Fa Tsai, 2022. "Identification of Applicable YouTubers for Hotels: A Case Study of Integrated Hybrid MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Chaofeng Li & Yasir Ahmed Solangi & Sharafat Ali, 2023. "Evaluating the Factors of Green Finance to Achieve Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality Targets in China: A Delphi and Fuzzy AHP Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Reny Nadlifatin & Satria Fadil Persada, 2022. "Determining Factors Affecting the Perceived Preparedness of Super Typhoon: Three Broad Domains of Ergonomics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, September.
    4. Benny Lianto, 2023. "Identifying Key Assessment Factors for a Company’s Innovation Capability Based on Intellectual Capital: An Application of the Fuzzy Delphi Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Mohammed Abdul-Rahman & Wale Alade & Shahnawaz Anwer, 2023. "A Composite Resilience Index (CRI) for Developing Resilience and Sustainability in University Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiuhsiang Joe Lin & Tariku Tamiru Belis & Tsai Chi Kuo, 2019. "Ergonomics-Based Factors or Criteria for the Evaluation of Sustainable Product Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Mohamed Abubakr & Adel T. Abbas & Italo Tomaz & Mahmoud S. Soliman & Monis Luqman & Hussien Hegab, 2020. "Sustainable and Smart Manufacturing: An Integrated Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Paraskevi Ovezikoglou & Dimitrios Aidonis & Charisios Achillas & Christos Vlachokostas & Dionysis Bochtis, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment of Investments Based on a Multiple Criteria Methodological Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Johan Du Plessis & Wouter Bam, 2018. "Comparing the Sustainable Development Potential of Industries: A Role for Sustainability Disclosures?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-30, March.
    5. Louisa Pollok & Sebastian Spierling & Hans-Josef Endres & Ulrike Grote, 2021. "Social Life Cycle Assessments: A Review on Past Development, Advances and Methodological Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    6. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Slavica Stamatovic Vuckovic & Kosara Kujundzic, 2023. "Strategies for Realization of Socially Sustainable Residential Buildings: Experts’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-31, April.
    7. Christopher Meyer & Laima Gerlitz & Monika Klein, 2022. "Creativity as a Key Constituent for Smart Specialization Strategies (S3), What Is in It for Peripheral Regions? Co-creating Sustainable and Resilient Tourism with Cultural and Creative Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-31, March.
    8. Lucie Kvasničková Stanislavská & Ladislav Pilař & Klára Margarisová & Roman Kvasnička, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media: Comparison between Developing and Developed Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Anette Hallin & Tina Karrbom‐Gustavsson & Peter Dobers, 2021. "Transition towards and of sustainability—Understanding sustainability as performative," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1948-1957, May.
    10. Ernestina Rubio-Mozos & Fernando E. García-Muiña & Laura Fuentes-Moraleda, 2020. "Sustainable Strategic Management Model for Hotel Companies: A Multi-Stakeholder Proposal to “Walk the Talk” toward SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    11. Camélia Radu & Nadia Smaili, 2021. "Corporate performance patterns of Canadian listed firms: Balancing financial and corporate social responsibility outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3344-3359, November.
    12. Damjan Maletič & Matjaž Maletič & Basim Al-Najjar & Boštjan Gomišček, 2018. "Development of a Model Linking Physical Asset Management to Sustainability Performance: An Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Paul Mansell & Simon P. Philbin & Tim Broyd, 2020. "Development of a New Business Model to Measure Organizational and Project-Level SDG Impact—Case Study of a Water Utility Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Josef-Peter Schöggl & Morgane M. C. Fritz & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2016. "Sustainability Assessment in Automotive and Electronics Supply Chains—A Set of Indicators Defined in a Multi-Stakeholder Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Thorey S Thorisdottir & Lara Johannsdottir, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility Influencing Sustainability within the Fashion Industry. A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-64, November.
    16. Paul Mansell & Simon P. Philbin & Efrosyni Konstantinou, 2020. "Redefining the Use of Sustainable Development Goals at the Organisation and Project Levels—A Survey of Engineers," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-39, August.
    17. Alvaro Mendez & David Patrick Houghton, 2020. "Sustainable Banking: The Role of Multilateral Development Banks as Norm Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Oriana Helena Negulescu & Anca Draghici & Gabriela Fistis, 2022. "A Proposed Approach to Monitor and Control Sustainable Development Strategy Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, September.
    19. Renee Paulet & Peter Holland & Andrew Bratton, 2021. "Employee Voice: The Missing Factor in Sustainable HRM?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Renata Konadu & Gabriel Sam Ahinful & Samuel Owusu-Agyei, 2021. "Corporate governance pillars and business sustainability: does stakeholder engagement matter?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 269-289, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6378-:d:396012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.