IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i3p677-d201324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Comparative Research: Mapping and Assessing Current Trends in Built Heritage Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Nir Mualam

    (Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel)

  • Nir Barak

    (Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel)

Abstract

The question leading this research is: what are the attributes and scales of comparative research that applies to built heritage studies? The paper begins by recognizing the interrelatedness of built heritage protection and sustainable urban development. While comparative research into built heritage studies analyses and documents existing practices, policies and impacts, its generalizable capacities are often lacking and therefore less applicable to policy-makers. In an attempt to further the potential contribution of such studies, the paper maps comparative built heritage research based on a critical review of over 100 articles and books. The analysis of these sources relies on an evaluative categorization of comparative built heritage studies. This categorization consists of four criteria: the number of compared cases, their geographic location, the scope of comparison and its degree of structuredness. The findings suggest that heritage studies compare a relatively small number of cases; they are quite structured; focus on local as well as national-level analysis; and lean towards Western-centered comparisons. The paper concludes by suggesting that built heritage studies can contribute to sustainable urban development policies by taking on comparative research that has a large enough N, expanding non-Eurocentric and Anglo-American research, comparing local jurisdictions in more than one country and by utilizing highly structured categories for comparison.

Suggested Citation

  • Nir Mualam & Nir Barak, 2019. "Evaluating Comparative Research: Mapping and Assessing Current Trends in Built Heritage Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:677-:d:201324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/677/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/677/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fortuna De Rosa & Maria Di Palma, 2013. "Historic Urban Landscape Approach and Port Cities Regeneration: Naples between Identity and Outlook," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(10), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Harriet Bulkeley & Andrés Luque-Ayala & Colin McFarlane & Gordon MacLeod, 2018. "Enhancing urban autonomy: Towards a new political project for cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(4), pages 702-719, March.
    3. Marlijn Baarveld & Marnix Smit & Geert Dewulf, 2018. "Implementing joint ambitions for redevelopment involving cultural heritage: a comparative case study of cooperation strategies," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 101-117, January.
    4. Stephanie Ryberg-Webster & Kelly L Kinahan, 2017. "Historic preservation in declining city neighbourhoods: Analysing rehabilitation tax credit investments in six US cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(7), pages 1673-1691, May.
    5. Aidan While, 2006. "Modernism vs Urban Renaissance: Negotiating Post-war Heritage in English City Centres," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(13), pages 2399-2419, December.
    6. Stephanie Ryberg-Webster, 2013. "Preserving Downtown America: Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credits and the Transformation of U.S. Cities," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(4), pages 266-279, October.
    7. Hellmut Wollmann, 2000. "Local Government Systems: From Historic Divergence towards Convergence? Great Britain, France, and Germany as Comparative Cases in Point," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 18(1), pages 33-55, February.
    8. Fung, Ivan W.H. & Tsang, Y.T. & Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Xu, Y.T. & Mok, Edmund C.K., 2017. "A review on historic building conservation: A comparison between Hong Kong and Macau systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 927-942.
    9. Arjo Klamer & Anna Mignosa & Lyudmila Lyudmila, 2013. "Cultural heritage policies: a comparative perspective," Chapters, in: Ilde Rizzo & Anna Mignosa (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, chapter 3, pages i-i, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Harold Wolman, 2008. "Comparing Local Government Systems across Countries: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges to Building a Field of Comparative Local Government Studies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 26(1), pages 87-103, February.
    11. Wei Ren & Feng Han, 2018. "Indicators for Assessing the Sustainability of Built Heritage Attractions: An Anglo-Chinese Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-28, July.
    12. Eran Razin, 2000. "The Impact of Local Government Organization on Development and Disparities — A Comparative Perspective," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 18(1), pages 17-31, February.
    13. Paul Kantor & H.V. Savitch, 2005. "How to Study Comparative Urban Development Politics: A Research Note," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 135-151, March.
    14. Valeria Guarneros-Meza, 2008. "Local Governance in Mexico: The Cases of Two Historic-centre Partnerships," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1011-1035, May.
    15. Ilde Rizzo & Anna Mignosa (ed.), 2013. "Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14326.
    16. Elene Negussie, 2006. "Implications of Neo-liberalism for Built Heritage Management: Institutional and Ownership Structures in Ireland and Sweden," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1803-1824, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nir Mualam & Debora Sotto, 2020. "From Progressive Property to Progressive Cities: Can Socially Sustainable Interpretations of Property Contribute toward Just and Inclusive City-Planning? Global Lessons," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-29, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruce Seaman, 2017. "¿Qué está en juego al optar entre distintas formas de apoyo para el sector cultural?," Estudios Públicos, Centro de Estudios Públicos, vol. 0(146), pages 121-162.
    2. Guccio, Calogero & Mignosa, Anna & Rizzo, Ilde, 2018. "Are public state libraries efficient? An empirical assessment using network Data Envelopment Analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 78-91.
    3. Maria Cerreta & Alessia Elefante & Ludovica La Rocca, 2020. "A Creative Living Lab for the Adaptive Reuse of the Morticelli Church: The SSMOLL Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Bruce A. Seaman, 2013. "The role of the private sector in cultural heritage," Chapters, in: Ilde Rizzo & Anna Mignosa (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, chapter 5, pages i-i, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Jennifer Robinson, 2011. "Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Bernard Jouve, 2007. "Urban Societies and Dominant Political Coalitions in the Internationalization of Cities," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(3), pages 374-390, June.
    7. Carlos Smaniotto Costa & Marluci Menezes & Petja Ivanova-Radovanova & Tatiana Ruchinskaya & Konstantinos Lalenis & Monica Bocci, 2021. "Planning Perspectives and Approaches for Activating Underground Built Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Irene Rubino & Cristina Coscia & Rocco Curto, 2020. "Identifying Spatial Relationships between Built Heritage Resources and Short-Term Rentals before the Covid-19 Pandemic: Exploratory Perspectives on Sustainability Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Guccio, Calogero & Martorana, Marco & Mazza, Isidoro & Pignataro, Giacomo & Rizzo, Ilde, 2020. "An assessment of the performance of Italian public historical archives: Preservation vs utilisation," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 1270-1286.
    10. Victor Ginsburgh & François Mairesse, 2013. "Issues in the international market for cultural heritage," Chapters, in: Ilde Rizzo & Anna Mignosa (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, chapter 7, pages i-i, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Karol Jan Borowiecki & Trilce Navarrete, 2018. "Fiscal and economic aspects of book consumption in the European Union," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(2), pages 309-339, May.
    12. Janowska, Anna Anetta & Malik, Radosław, 2020. "Digitization in museums: Between a fashionable trend and market awareness," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 7(3), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Douglas S. Noonan & Ilde Rizzo, 2017. "Economics of cultural tourism: issues and perspectives," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(2), pages 95-107, May.
    14. John Gilderbloom & Katrina Anaker & Gregory Squires & Matt Hanka & Joshua Ambrosius, 2011. "Why Foreclosure Rates in African American Neighborhoods are so High: Looking at the Real Reaonss," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1597, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Gómez Vega, Mafalda & Herrero Prieto, Luis César, 2017. "Determinantes de la eficiencia en la captación de turismo cultural nacional y extranjero en España: Un análisis regional/Drivers of Efficiency in Attracting Domestic and Foreign Cultural Tourism to Sp," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 35, pages 849-872, Agosto.
    16. Vincent,Jeffrey R. & Carson,Richard T. & Navrud,Stale & Ortiz Bobea,Ariel & Strand,Jon & Vincent,Jeffrey R. & Carson,Richard T. & Navrud,Stale & Ortiz Bobea,Ariel & Strand,Jon, 2014. "A"Delphi exercise"as a tool in Amazon rainforest valuation," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7143, The World Bank.
    17. Silvia Cerisola & Elisa Panzera, 2021. "Cultural and Creative Cities and Regional Economic Efficiency: Context Conditions as Catalyzers of Cultural Vibrancy and Creative Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Min Yin & Jiangang Xu & Zhongyuan Yang, 2019. "Preliminary Research on Planning of Decentralizing Ancient Towns in Small-Scale Famous Historic and Cultural Cities with a Case Study of Tingchow County, Fujian Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    19. Daniela Angelina Jelinčić, 2021. "Indicators for Cultural and Creative Industries’ Impact Assessment on Cultural Heritage and Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    20. Strand, Jon & Carson, Richard T. & Navrud, Stale & Ortiz-Bobea, Ariel & Vincent, Jeffrey R., 2017. "Using the Delphi method to value protection of the Amazon rainforest," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 475-484.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:677-:d:201324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.