IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i24p7172-d298054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Policy for Office Building Design in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Younghoon Kwak

    (Department of Architecture, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Korea)

  • Jeong-A Kang

    (School of Architecture, Kyonggi University, Suwon-si 16227, Gyeonggi-do 16227, Korea)

  • Jung-Ho Huh

    (Department of Architecture, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Korea)

  • Tae-Hyoung Kim

    (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283 Goyangdae-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10223, Korea)

  • Young-Sun Jeong

    (Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283 Goyangdae-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10223, Korea)

Abstract

This paper examines the effectiveness of South Korea’s policy for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in office buildings and evaluates if national targets can be met. A sample of office buildings was categorized into two groups—conventional (Group A) and new (Group B)—based on when their construction was approved. Furthermore, data regarding the three design elements of the building envelope, that is building form, window systems, and U-values were collected. By statistically processing data of each element, reference building models were developed and a case study was conducted for each building. Design changes that were incorporated, keeping in mind the GHG reduction policy, showed 13.1% of saving energy in case 8 (reference building of Group B) than case 1 (reference building of Group A). The savings in case 8 were more than the average GHG reduction rate (12.8%) compared to business as usual (BAU). However, case 4 (a conventional (Group A) building form with new (Group B) window systems and U-values) achieved the greatest savings in building loads. The policy to enhance insulation in new buildings to reduce GHG emissions in the building sector has prompted changes in building forms and window systems and has reduced emissions by 10%, that is 3% more than the expected value. Thus, new innovations in building envelope design could achieve an average 12.8% reduction in emissions in buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Younghoon Kwak & Jeong-A Kang & Jung-Ho Huh & Tae-Hyoung Kim & Young-Sun Jeong, 2019. "An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Policy for Office Building Design in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7172-:d:298054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7172/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7172/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arıcı, Müslüm & Kan, Miraç, 2015. "An investigation of flow and conjugate heat transfer in multiple pane windows with respect to gap width, emissivity and gas filling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 249-256.
    2. Wang, Huan & Chen, Wenying & Shi, Jingcheng, 2018. "Low carbon transition of global building sector under 2- and 1.5-degree targets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 148-157.
    3. Brandão de Vasconcelos, Ana & Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte & Manso, Armando & Cabaço, António, 2015. "A Portuguese approach to define reference buildings for cost-optimal methodologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 316-328.
    4. Brandão de Vasconcelos, Ana & Cabaço, António & Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte & Manso, Armando, 2016. "The impact of building orientation and discount rates on a Portuguese reference building refurbishment decision," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 329-340.
    5. Ballarini, Ilaria & Corgnati, Stefano Paolo & Corrado, Vincenzo, 2014. "Use of reference buildings to assess the energy saving potentials of the residential building stock: The experience of TABULA project," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 273-284.
    6. Cellura, Maurizio & Guarino, Francesco & Longo, Sonia & Mistretta, Marina, 2017. "Modeling the energy and environmental life cycle of buildings: A co-simulation approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 733-742.
    7. Wang, Tao & Seo, Seongwon & Liao, Pin-Chao & Fang, Dongping, 2016. "GHG emission reduction performance of state-of-the-art green buildings: Review of two case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 484-493.
    8. Li, Jun & Ng, S. Thomas & Skitmore, Martin, 2017. "Review of low-carbon refurbishment solutions for residential buildings with particular reference to multi-story buildings in Hong Kong," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 393-407.
    9. Buso, Tiziana & Corgnati, Stefano Paolo, 2017. "A customized modelling approach for multi-functional buildings – Application to an Italian Reference Hotel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1302-1315.
    10. Quddus, Md Abdul & Shahvari, Omid & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Usher, John M. & Jaradat, Raed, 2018. "A collaborative energy sharing optimization model among electric vehicle charging stations, commercial buildings, and power grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 841-857.
    11. Soo Cho & Seok-Hyun Kim, 2017. "Analysis of the Performance of Vacuum Glazing in Office Buildings in Korea: Simulation and Experimental Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Iwaro, Joseph & Mwasha, Abraham, 2010. "A review of building energy regulation and policy for energy conservation in developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 7744-7755, December.
    13. Tan, Xianchun & Lai, Haiping & Gu, Baihe & Zeng, Yuan & Li, Hui, 2018. "Carbon emission and abatement potential outlook in China's building sector through 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 429-439.
    14. Corgnati, Stefano Paolo & Fabrizio, Enrico & Filippi, Marco & Monetti, Valentina, 2013. "Reference buildings for cost optimal analysis: Method of definition and application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 983-993.
    15. Wang, Tao & Foliente, Greg & Song, Xinyi & Xue, Jiawei & Fang, Dongping, 2014. "Implications and future direction of greenhouse gas emission mitigation policies in the building sector of China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 520-530.
    16. Kazas, Georgios & Fabrizio, Enrico & Perino, Marco, 2017. "Energy demand profile generation with detailed time resolution at an urban district scale: A reference building approach and case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 243-262.
    17. Yu, Sha & Eom, Jiyong & Evans, Meredydd & Clarke, Leon, 2014. "A long-term, integrated impact assessment of alternative building energy code scenarios in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 626-639.
    18. Roberts, Mike B. & Bruce, Anna & MacGill, Iain, 2019. "Impact of shared battery energy storage systems on photovoltaic self-consumption and electricity bills in apartment buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 78-95.
    19. Young-Sun Jeong, 2017. "Assessment of Alternative Scenarios for CO 2 Reduction Potential in the Residential Building Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Chen, Yixing & Hong, Tianzhen, 2018. "Impacts of building geometry modeling methods on the simulation results of urban building energy models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 717-735.
    21. Parra, David & Swierczynski, Maciej & Stroe, Daniel I. & Norman, Stuart.A. & Abdon, Andreas & Worlitschek, Jörg & O’Doherty, Travis & Rodrigues, Lucelia & Gillott, Mark & Zhang, Xiaojin & Bauer, Chris, 2017. "An interdisciplinary review of energy storage for communities: Challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 730-749.
    22. Tae-Hyoung Kim & Young-Sun Jeong, 2018. "Analysis of Energy-Related Greenhouse Gas Emission in the Korea’s Building Sector: Use National Energy Statistics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ji, Changyoon & Hong, Taehoon & Kim, Hakpyeong, 2022. "Statistical analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of South Korean residential buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Younghoon Kwak & Jeonga Kang & Sun-Hye Mun & Young-Sun Jeong & Jung-Ho Huh, 2020. "Development and Application of a Flexible Modeling Approach to Reference Buildings for Energy Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Younghoon Kwak & Jeonga Kang & Sun-Hye Mun & Young-Sun Jeong & Jung-Ho Huh, 2020. "Development and Application of a Flexible Modeling Approach to Reference Buildings for Energy Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Gatt, Damien & Yousif, Charles & Cellura, Maurizio & Camilleri, Liberato & Guarino, Francesco, 2020. "Assessment of building energy modelling studies to meet the requirements of the new Energy Performance of Buildings Directive," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Ji, Changyoon & Hong, Taehoon & Kim, Hakpyeong, 2022. "Statistical analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of South Korean residential buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Yamaguchi, Yohei & Kim, Bumjoon & Kitamura, Takuya & Akizawa, Kotone & Chen, Hemiao & Shimoda, Yoshiyuki, 2022. "Building stock energy modeling considering building system composition and long-term change for climate change mitigation of commercial building stocks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    5. Attia, Shady & Shadmanfar, Niloufar & Ricci, Federico, 2020. "Developing two benchmark models for nearly zero energy schools," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    6. Buso, Tiziana & Corgnati, Stefano Paolo, 2017. "A customized modelling approach for multi-functional buildings – Application to an Italian Reference Hotel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1302-1315.
    7. Tang, Bao-Jun & Guo, Yang-Yang & Yu, Biying & Harvey, L.D. Danny, 2021. "Pathways for decarbonizing China’s building sector under global warming thresholds," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    8. Crespi, Giulia & Becchio, Cristina & Corgnati, Stefano Paolo, 2021. "Towards Post-Carbon Cities: Which retrofit scenarios for hotels in Italy?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 950-963.
    9. Shen, Pengyuan & Wang, Huilong, 2024. "Archetype building energy modeling approaches and applications: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    10. Langevin, J. & Reyna, J.L. & Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S. & Sandberg, N. & Fennell, P. & Nägeli, C. & Laverge, J. & Delghust, M. & Mata, É. & Van Hove, M. & Webster, J. & Federico, F. & Jakob, M. & Camaras, 2020. "Developing a common approach for classifying building stock energy models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Hanan S.S. Ibrahim & Ahmed Z. Khan & Shady Attia & Yehya Serag, 2021. "Classification of Heritage Residential Building Stock and Defining Sustainable Retrofitting Scenarios in Khedivial Cairo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    12. Baglivo, Cristina & Congedo, Paolo Maria & D'Agostino, Delia & Zacà, Ilaria, 2015. "Cost-optimal analysis and technical comparison between standard and high efficient mono-residential buildings in a warm climate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 560-575.
    13. Brandão de Vasconcelos, Ana & Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte & Manso, Armando & Cabaço, António, 2015. "A Portuguese approach to define reference buildings for cost-optimal methodologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 316-328.
    14. Bienvenido-Huertas, David & Moyano, Juan & Rodríguez-Jiménez, Carlos E. & Marín, David, 2019. "Applying an artificial neural network to assess thermal transmittance in walls by means of the thermometric method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 1-14.
    15. Wang, Tao & Seo, Seongwon & Liao, Pin-Chao & Fang, Dongping, 2016. "GHG emission reduction performance of state-of-the-art green buildings: Review of two case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 484-493.
    16. Liu, Junling & Yin, Mingjian & Xia-Hou, Qinrui & Wang, Ke & Zou, Ji, 2021. "Comparison of sectoral low-carbon transition pathways in China under the nationally determined contribution and 2 °C targets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Haiyan Duan & Shipei Zhang & Siying Duan & Weicheng Zhang & Zhiyuan Duan & Shuo Wang & Junnian Song & Xian’en Wang, 2019. "Carbon Emissions Peak Prediction and the Reduction Pathway in Buildings during Operation in Jilin Province Based on LEAP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-23, August.
    18. Rajat Nainwal & Aniket Sharma, 2025. "Energy efficiency initiatives and regulations for commercial buildings in India: a review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 1-52, January.
    19. D'Agostino, D. & Parker, D. & Epifani, I. & Crawley, D. & Lawrie, L., 2022. "How will future climate impact the design and performance of nearly zero energy buildings (NZEBs)?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    20. Ascione, Fabrizio & Bianco, Nicola & De Stasio, Claudio & Mauro, Gerardo Maria & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2017. "Artificial neural networks to predict energy performance and retrofit scenarios for any member of a building category: A novel approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 999-1017.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7172-:d:298054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.