IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i24p6883-d293871.html

Background Similarities as a Way to Predict Students’ Behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Burgos

    (UNIR iTED, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR), Logroño, 26006 La Rioja, Spain)

Abstract

The number of students opting for online educational platforms has been on the rise in recent years. Despite the upsurge, student retention is still a challenging task, with some students recording low-performance margins on online courses. This paper aims to predict students’ performance and behaviour based on their online activities on an e-learning platform. The paper will focus on the data logging history and utilise the learning management system (LMS) data set that is available on the Sakai platform. The data obtained from the LMS will be classified based on students’ learning styles in the e-learning environment. This classification will help students, teachers, and other stakeholders to engage early with students who are more likely to excel in selected topics. Therefore, clustering students based on their cognitive styles and overall performance will enable better adaption of the learning materials to their learning styles. The model-building steps include data preprocessing, parameter optimisation, and attribute selection procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Burgos, 2019. "Background Similarities as a Way to Predict Students’ Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:6883-:d:293871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/6883/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/6883/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher W. Allinson & John Hayes, 1996. "The Cognitive Style Index: A Measure of Intuition‐Analysis For Organizational Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 119-135, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khurram Jawad & Muhammad Arif Shah & Muhammad Tahir, 2022. "Students’ Academic Performance and Engagement Prediction in a Virtual Learning Environment Using Random Forest with Data Balancing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan, Chien Sheng Richard & Park, Haemin Dennis, 2013. "The influence of dispositional affect and cognition on venture investment portfolio concentration," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 397-412.
    2. Dimitriadis, Nikolaos & Psychogios, Alexandros, 2020. "Social Brain-Constructed Relational Leadership:A Neuroscience View of the Leader-Follower Duality," CAFE Working Papers 1, Centre for Accountancy, Finance and Economics (CAFE), Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University.
    3. Corbett, Andrew C., 2007. "Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 97-118, January.
    4. Marzi, Giacomo & Fakhar Manesh, Mohammad & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano Matteo & Vlačić, Božidar, 2023. "Do or do not. Cognitive configurations affecting open innovation adoption in SMEs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Blume, Brian D. & Covin, Jeffrey G., 2011. "Attributions to intuition in the venture founding process: Do entrepreneurs actually use intuition or just say that they do?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 137-151, January.
    6. Jill Kickul & Lisa K. Gundry & Saulo D. Barbosa & Laney Whitcanack, 2009. "Intuition versus Analysis? Testing Differential Models of Cognitive Style on Entrepreneurial Self–Efficacy and the New Venture Creation Process," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(2), pages 439-453, March.
    7. Stephany, Fabian & Teutloff, Ole & Lehdonvirta, Vili, 2022. "What is the price of a skill? Revealing the complementary value of skills," MPRA Paper 114874, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Brandon A. Mueller & Dean A. Shepherd, 2016. "Making the Most of Failure Experiences: Exploring the Relationship between Business Failure and the Identification of Business Opportunities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(3), pages 457-487, May.
    9. Cui, Yu & Sun, Chuan & Xiao, Hongjun & Zhao, Chunming, 2016. "How to become an excellent entrepreneur: The moderating effect of risk propensity on alertness to business ideas and entrepreneurial capabilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 171-177.
    10. Qi Li & Qiang Jiang & Jyh-Chong Liang & Weiyan Xiong & Wei Zhao, 2025. "Roles of programming self-efficacy, cognitive styles, and self-regulated learning strategies on computational thinking in computer programming," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Kopalle, Praveen K. & Kuusela, Hannu & Lehmann, Donald R., 2023. "The role of intuition in CEO acquisition decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Cheryl R. Mitteness & Rich DeJordy & Manju K. Ahuja & Richard Sudek, 2016. "Extending the Role of Similarity Attraction in Friendship and Advice Networks in Angel Groups," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(3), pages 627-655, May.
    13. Yongsun Paik & Jong Min Lee & Yong Suhk Pak, 2019. "Convergence in International Business Ethics? A Comparative Study of Ethical Philosophies, Thinking Style, and Ethical Decision-Making Between US and Korean Managers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 839-855, May.
    14. Stephany, Fabian & Teutloff, Ole, 2024. "What is the price of a skill? The value of complementarity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    15. Sebastian Krakowski & Darek Haftor & Johannes Luger & Natallia Pashkevich & Sebastian Raisch, 2026. "Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: A Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 57-72, January.
    16. Sophia Belghiti-Mahut & Anne-Laurence Lafont & Angélique Rodhain & Florence Rodhain & Leila Temri & Ouidad Yousfi, 2016. "Genre et innovateur frugal : 4 cas de femmes innovatrices," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 69-93.
    17. Silvia Raffaldi & Paola Iannello & Laura Vittani & Alessandro Antonietti, 2012. "Decision-Making Styles in the Workplace," SAGE Open, , vol. 2(2), pages 21582440124, May.
    18. Mahajan, Manoj & Chan, C. S. Richard & Parhankangas, Annaleena, 2023. "Processing preferences and crowdfunding pitch evaluations," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    19. Elisabet Ruiz-Dotras & Josep Lladós-Masllorens, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Self-efficacy and Financial and Calculation Skills Can Shape Different Profiles of Venture Intentions," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(1), pages 153-183, March.
    20. Mohammad Salman Shabbir & Mohd Noor Mohd Shariff & Arfan Shahzad, 2016. "Determinants of Entrepreneurial Skills set in Pakistan: A Pilot Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 76-86, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:6883-:d:293871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.