IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i22p6482-d288124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of Favourable Concept of Energy Retrofitting Solution for Social Housing in the Czech Republic Based on Economic Parameters, Greenhouse Gases, and Primary Energy Consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Katerina Sojkova

    (University Centre for Energy Efficient Buildings, Czech Technical University in Prague, 273 43 Buštěhrad, Czech Republic)

  • Martin Volf

    (University Centre for Energy Efficient Buildings, Czech Technical University in Prague, 273 43 Buštěhrad, Czech Republic)

  • Antonin Lupisek

    (University Centre for Energy Efficient Buildings, Czech Technical University in Prague, 273 43 Buštěhrad, Czech Republic)

  • Roman Bolliger

    (Institute for Sustainability and Democracy Policy, 6003 Luzern, Switzerland)

  • Tomas Vachal

    (Department of Construction Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 166 29 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Energy retrofitting of existing building stock has significant potential for the reduction of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Roughly half of the CO 2 emissions from Czech building stock are estimated to be allocated to residential buildings. Approximately one-third of the Czech residential building stock have already been retrofitted, but retrofitting mostly takes place in large cities due to greater income. A favourable concept for the mass retrofitting of residential building stock, affordable even in low-income regions, was of interest. For a reference building, multi-criteria assessment of numerous retrofitting measures was performed. The calculation involved different building elements, materials, solutions, and energy-efficiency levels in combination with various heating systems. The assessment comprised environmental impact, represented by operational and embodied primary energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, and investment and operational costs using the annuity method. Analysis resulted in the identification of favourable retrofitting measures and showed that complex building retrofitting is advantageous from both a cost and an environmental point of view. The environmental burden could be decreased by approximately 10–30% even without photovoltaic installation, and costs per year could be decreased by around 40%.

Suggested Citation

  • Katerina Sojkova & Martin Volf & Antonin Lupisek & Roman Bolliger & Tomas Vachal, 2019. "Selection of Favourable Concept of Energy Retrofitting Solution for Social Housing in the Czech Republic Based on Economic Parameters, Greenhouse Gases, and Primary Energy Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-26, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6482-:d:288124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6482/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6482/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martinaitis, Vytautas & Kazakevicius, Eduardas & Vitkauskas, Aloyzas, 2007. "A two-factor method for appraising building renovation and energy efficiency improvement projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 192-201, January.
    2. Juan Aranda & Ignacio Zabalza & Andrea Conserva & Gema Millán, 2017. "Analysis of Energy Efficiency Measures and Retrofitting Solutions for Social Housing Buildings in Spain as a Way to Mitigate Energy Poverty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Chantrelle, Fanny Pernodet & Lahmidi, Hicham & Keilholz, Werner & Mankibi, Mohamed El & Michel, Pierre, 2011. "Development of a multicriteria tool for optimizing the renovation of buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1386-1394, April.
    4. Buratti, C. & Barbanera, M. & Palladino, D., 2014. "An original tool for checking energy performance and certification of buildings by means of Artificial Neural Networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 125-132.
    5. Ástmarsson, Björn & Jensen, Per Anker & Maslesa, Esmir, 2013. "Sustainable renovation of residential buildings and the landlord/tenant dilemma," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 355-362.
    6. Karmellos, M. & Kiprakis, A. & Mavrotas, G., 2015. "A multi-objective approach for optimal prioritization of energy efficiency measures in buildings: Model, software and case studies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 131-150.
    7. Xie, Yiwei & Hu, Pingfang & Zhu, Na & Lei, Fei & Xing, Lu & Xu, Linghong, 2020. "Collaborative optimization of ground source heat pump-radiant ceiling air conditioning system based on response surface method and NSGA-II," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 249-264.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Darija Gajić & Slobodan Peulić & Tim Mavrič & Anna Sandak & Črtomir Tavzes & Milica Malešević & Mladen Slijepčević, 2021. "Energy Retrofitting Opportunities Using Renewable Materials—Comparative Analysis of the Current Frameworks in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Hamels, Sam & Himpe, Eline & Laverge, Jelle & Delghust, Marc & Van den Brande, Kjartan & Janssens, Arnold & Albrecht, Johan, 2021. "The use of primary energy factors and CO2 intensities for electricity in the European context - A systematic methodological review and critical evaluation of the contemporary literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Rui Oliveira & Ricardo M.S.F. Almeida & António Figueiredo & Romeu Vicente, 2021. "A Case Study on a Stochastic-Based Optimisation Approach towards the Integration of Photovoltaic Panels in Multi-Residential Social Housing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rabani, Mehrdad & Bayera Madessa, Habtamu & Mohseni, Omid & Nord, Natasa, 2020. "Minimizing delivered energy and life cycle cost using Graphical script: An office building retrofitting case," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    2. Diakaki, Christina & Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Kolokotsa, Dionyssia, 2013. "Performance study of a multi-objective mathematical programming modelling approach for energy decision-making in buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 534-542.
    3. Kangji Li & Lei Pan & Wenping Xue & Hui Jiang & Hanping Mao, 2017. "Multi-Objective Optimization for Energy Performance Improvement of Residential Buildings: A Comparative Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Delgarm, N. & Sajadi, B. & Kowsary, F. & Delgarm, S., 2016. "Multi-objective optimization of the building energy performance: A simulation-based approach by means of particle swarm optimization (PSO)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 293-303.
    5. Mehrdad Rabani & Habtamu Bayera Madessa & Natasa Nord, 2021. "Building Retrofitting through Coupling of Building Energy Simulation-Optimization Tool with CFD and Daylight Programs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Ballarini, Ilaria & Corrado, Vincenzo & Madonna, Francesco & Paduos, Simona & Ravasio, Franco, 2017. "Energy refurbishment of the Italian residential building stock: energy and cost analysis through the application of the building typology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 148-160.
    7. Wu, Bingjie & Cai, Wenjian & Chen, Haoran, 2021. "A model-based multi-objective optimization of energy consumption and thermal comfort for active chilled beam systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    8. Ascione, Fabrizio & Bianco, Nicola & De Stasio, Claudio & Mauro, Gerardo Maria & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2016. "Multi-stage and multi-objective optimization for energy retrofitting a developed hospital reference building: A new approach to assess cost-optimality," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 37-68.
    9. Ceballos-Fuentealba, Irlanda & Álvarez-Miranda, Eduardo & Torres-Fuchslocher, Carlos & del Campo-Hitschfeld, María Luisa & Díaz-Guerrero, John, 2019. "A simulation and optimisation methodology for choosing energy efficiency measures in non-residential buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    10. Wu, Raphael & Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2017. "Multiobjective optimisation of energy systems and building envelope retrofit in a residential community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 634-649.
    11. Ferreira, Joaquim & Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte & Brito, Jorge de, 2013. "Refurbishment decision support tools review—Energy and life cycle as key aspects to sustainable refurbishment projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1453-1460.
    12. Diana Manjarres & Lara Mabe & Xabat Oregi & Itziar Landa-Torres, 2019. "Two-Stage Multi-Objective Meta-Heuristics for Environmental and Cost-Optimal Energy Refurbishment at District Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Haolan Liao & Rong Ren & Lu Li, 2023. "Existing Building Renovation: A Review of Barriers to Economic and Environmental Benefits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-23, February.
    14. Feng, Zongbao & Wu, Xianguo & Chen, Hongyu & Qin, Yawei & Zhang, Limao & Skibniewski, Miroslaw J., 2022. "An energy performance contracting parameter optimization method based on the response surface method: A case study of a metro in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    15. Schlomann, Barbara & Schleich, Joachim, 2015. "Adoption of low-cost energy efficiency measures in the tertiary sector—An empirical analysis based on energy survey data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1127-1133.
    16. Risholt, Birgit & Berker, Thomas, 2013. "Success for energy efficient renovation of dwellings—Learning from private homeowners," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1022-1030.
    17. Sierra-Pérez, Jorge & Rodríguez-Soria, Beatriz & Boschmonart-Rives, Jesús & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2018. "Integrated life cycle assessment and thermodynamic simulation of a public building’s envelope renovation: Conventional vs. Passivhaus proposal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1510-1521.
    18. Sergio Gómez Melgar & Miguel Ángel Martínez Bohórquez & José Manuel Andújar Márquez, 2020. "uhuMEBr: Energy Refurbishment of Existing Buildings in Subtropical Climates to Become Minimum Energy Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-35, March.
    19. Cinzia Buratti & Francesco Asdrubali & Domenico Palladino & Antonella Rotili, 2015. "Energy Performance Database of Building Heritage in the Region of Umbria, Central Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Kristina Mjörnell & Paula Femenías & Kerstin Annadotter, 2019. "Renovation Strategies for Multi-Residential Buildings from the Record Years in Sweden—Profit-Driven or Socioeconomically Responsible?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6482-:d:288124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.