IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i22p6312-d285613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining Multi-Modal Statistics for Welfare Prediction Using Deep Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Pulkit Sharma

    (Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK)

  • Achut Manandhar

    (Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK)

  • Patrick Thomson

    (School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK
    Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK)

  • Jacob Katuva

    (School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK)

  • Robert Hope

    (School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK
    Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK)

  • David A. Clifton

    (Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK)

Abstract

In the context of developing countries, effective groundwater resource management is often hindered by a lack of data integration between resource availability, water demand, and the welfare of water users. As a consequence, drinking water-related policies and investments, while broadly beneficial, are unlikely to be able to target the most in need. To find the households in need, we need to estimate their welfare status first. However, the current practices for estimating welfare need a detailed questionnaire in the form of a survey which is time-consuming and resource-intensive. In this work, we propose an alternate solution to this problem by performing a small set of cost-effective household surveys, which can be collected over a short amount of time. We try to compensate for the loss of information by using other modalities of data. By combining different modalities of data, this work aims to characterize the welfare status of people with respect to their local drinking water resource. This work employs deep learning-based methods to model welfare using multi-modal data from household surveys, community handpump abstraction, and groundwater levels. We employ a multi-input multi-output deep learning framework, where different types of deep learning models are used for different modalities of data. Experimental results in this work have demonstrated that the multi-modal data in the form of a small set of survey questions, handpump abstraction data, and groundwater level can be used to estimate the welfare status of households. In addition, the results show that different modalities of data have complementary information, which, when combined, improves the overall performance of our ability to predict welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Pulkit Sharma & Achut Manandhar & Patrick Thomson & Jacob Katuva & Robert Hope & David A. Clifton, 2019. "Combining Multi-Modal Statistics for Welfare Prediction Using Deep Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6312-:d:285613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6312/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6312/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. -, 2014. "A World that Counts: Mobilising the Data Revolution for Sustainable Development," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 40319 edited by United Nations.
    2. Alejandro Llorente & Manuel Garcia-Herranz & Manuel Cebrian & Esteban Moro, 2015. "Social Media Fingerprints of Unemployment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Hanjra, Munir A. & Ferede, Tadele & Gutta, Debel Gemechu, 2009. "Pathways to breaking the poverty trap in Ethiopia: Investments in agricultural water, education, and markets," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1596-1604, November.
    4. Hyunyoung Choi & Hal Varian, 2012. "Predicting the Present with Google Trends," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 88(s1), pages 2-9, June.
    5. Deon Filmer & Lant Pritchett, 2001. "Estimating Wealth Effects Without Expenditure Data—Or Tears: An Application To Educational Enrollments In States Of India," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 38(1), pages 115-132, February.
    6. Lee, Yong Suk, 2018. "International isolation and regional inequality: Evidence from sanctions on North Korea," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 34-51.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ola Hall & Francis Dompae & Ibrahim Wahab & Fred Mawunyo Dzanku, 2023. "A review of machine learning and satellite imagery for poverty prediction: Implications for development research and applications," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(7), pages 1753-1768, October.
    2. Francis Rathinam & Sayak Khatua & Zeba Siddiqui & Manya Malik & Pallavi Duggal & Samantha Watson & Xavier Vollenweider, 2021. "Using big data for evaluating development outcomes: A systematic map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
    3. Jian Gao & Tao Zhou, 2017. "Quantifying China's Regional Economic Complexity," Papers 1703.01292, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2017.
    4. David Pastor-Escuredo & Yolanda Torres & María Martínez-Torres & Pedro J. Zufiria, 2020. "Rapid Multi-Dimensional Impact Assessment of Floods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Ridhi Kashyap & Ingmar Weber & Reham Al Tamime & Masoomali Fatehkia, 2020. "Monitoring global digital gender inequality using the online populations of Facebook and Google," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(27), pages 779-816.
    6. Grazia Biorci & Antonella Emina & Michelangelo Puliga & Lisa Sella & Gianna Vivaldo, 2016. "Tweet-tales: moods of socio-economic crisis?," Working Papers 04/2016, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, revised Jul 2016.
    7. Diane Coffey & Ashwini Deshpande & Jeffrey Hammer & Dean Spears, 2019. "Local Social Inequality, Economic Inequality, and Disparities in Child Height in India," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(4), pages 1427-1452, August.
    8. POPESCU Mioara, 2015. "Construction Of Economic Indicators Using Internet Searches," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 6(1), pages 25-31.
    9. Francesco Capozza & Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2021. "Studying Information Acquisition in the Field: A Practical Guide and Review," CEBI working paper series 21-15, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    10. Angus Deaton & Jean Dreze, 2008. "Nutrition in India: Facts and Interpretations," Working Papers 1071, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Research Program in Development Studies..
    11. Cornelie Nienaber-Rousseau & Olusola F. Sotunde & Patricia O. Ukegbu & P. Hermanus Myburgh & Hattie H. Wright & Lize Havemann-Nel & Sarah J. Moss & Iolanthé M. Kruger & H. Salomé Kruger, 2017. "Socio-Demographic and Lifestyle Factors Predict 5-Year Changes in Adiposity among a Group of Black South African Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, September.
    12. David W Carter & Scott Crosson & Christopher Liese, 2015. "Nowcasting Intraseasonal Recreational Fishing Harvest with Internet Search Volume," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Langyintuo, Augustine S. & Mungoma, Catherine, 2008. "The effect of household wealth on the adoption of improved maize varieties in Zambia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 550-559, December.
    14. Derek Headey & David Stifel & Liangzhi You & Zhe Guo, 2018. "Remoteness, urbanization, and child nutrition in sub‐Saharan Africa," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(6), pages 765-775, November.
    15. Barik, Debasis & Desai, Sonalde & Vanneman, Reeve, 2018. "Economic Status and Adult Mortality in India: Is the Relationship Sensitive to Choice of Indicators?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 176-187.
    16. Laetitia Duval & François-Charles Wolff, 2016. "Emigration intentions of Roma: evidence from Central and South-East Europe," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 87-107, January.
    17. M Mahmud Khan & Sebastian Taylor & Chris Morry & Shyamkumar Sriram & Ibrahim Demir & Mizan Siddiqi, 2023. "How reliable is the asset score in measuring socioeconomic status? Comparing asset ownership reported by male and female heads of households," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-15, February.
    18. Paschalis Arvanitidis & Athina Economou & Christos Kollias, 2016. "Terrorism’s effects on social capital in European countries," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 231-250, December.
    19. Sansone, Dario, 2019. "Pink work: Same-sex marriage, employment and discrimination," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    20. Janina Isabel Steinert & Lucie Dale Cluver & G. J. Melendez-Torres & Sebastian Vollmer, 2018. "One Size Fits All? The Validity of a Composite Poverty Index Across Urban and Rural Households in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 51-72, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6312-:d:285613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.