IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i15p4251-d255235.html

Understanding Visual Engagement with Urban Street Edges along Non-Pedestrianised and Pedestrianised Streets Using Mobile Eye-Tracking

Author

Listed:
  • James Simpson

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK)

  • Kevin Thwaites

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK)

  • Megan Freeth

    (Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 2LT, UK)

Abstract

Existing knowledge of street edge experience has often been constructed using methods that offer a limited opportunity to gain empirical insight from the first-hand perspective of pedestrians. In order to address this, mobile eye-tracking glasses were used during the current investigation to provide a detailed understanding of pedestrian visual engagement with street edges along both non-pedestrianised and pedestrianised urban streets. Through this, the current study advances empirical knowledge of street edge experience from a perspective that has previously been challenging to capture and quantify. The findings demonstrate that people visually engage with street edge ground floors more than their upper floors, that visual engagement is distributed more towards the street edge on the walked side of non-pedestrianised streets than the opposite side, and that visual engagement with street edges of pedestrianised streets is balanced across both sides. The study findings also highlight how the everyday activities of pedestrians and different streets being walked often influence the amount of visual engagement within these street edge areas. These insights provide a new understanding that develops existing knowledge of pedestrian street edge experience. Significantly, they also provide an empirical foundation from which to examine how design intervention can become more considerate of peoples’ routine use of and experiential engagement with street edges along non-pedestrianised and pedestrianised urban streets.

Suggested Citation

  • James Simpson & Kevin Thwaites & Megan Freeth, 2019. "Understanding Visual Engagement with Urban Street Edges along Non-Pedestrianised and Pedestrianised Streets Using Mobile Eye-Tracking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4251-:d:255235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4251/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4251/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neil Wrigley & Cliff Guy & Michelle Lowe, 2002. "Urban Regeneration, Social Inclusion and Large Store Development: The Seacroft Development in Context," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(11), pages 2101-2114, October.
    2. Emily Talen & Hyesun Jeong, 2019. "Does the classic American main street still exist? An exploratory look," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 78-98, January.
    3. Robert B. Noland & Marc D. Weiner & Dong Gao & Michael P. Cook & Anton Nelessen, 2017. "Eye-tracking technology, visual preference surveys, and urban design: preliminary evidence of an effective methodology," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 98-110, January.
    4. James Simpson & Megan Freeth & Kimberley J. Simpson & Kevin Thwaites, 2019. "Visual engagement with urban street edges: insights using mobile eye-tracking," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 259-278, July.
    5. Jon Burley & Gina Deyoung & Shawn Partin & Jason Rokos, 2011. "Reinventing Detroit: Reclaiming Grayfields—New Metrics in Evaluating Urban Environments," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-10, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Simpson & Megan Freeth & Kimberley Jayne Simpson & Kevin Thwaites, 2022. "Street edge subdivision: Structuring ground floor interfaces to stimulate pedestrian visual engagement," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1775-1791, July.
    2. Nawaf Saeed Al Mushayt & Francesca Dal Cin & Sérgio Barreiros Proença, 2021. "New Lens to Reveal the Street Interface. A Morphological-Visual Perception Methodological Contribution for Decoding the Public/Private Edge of Arterial Streets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Zhi Yue & Ying Zhong & Zhouxiao Cui, 2022. "Respondent Dynamic Attention to Streetscape Composition in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nawaf Saeed Al Mushayt & Francesca Dal Cin & Sérgio Barreiros Proença, 2021. "New Lens to Reveal the Street Interface. A Morphological-Visual Perception Methodological Contribution for Decoding the Public/Private Edge of Arterial Streets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Robert Baldock & David North & Ian Vickers, 2015. "Sub-post offices and high street revitalisation: Lessons from the experience of grant assistance to sub-post offices in deprived urban areas of the UK," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(4), pages 435-451, June.
    3. Andy Gouldson & Rory Sullivan, 2014. "Understanding the Governance of Corporations: An Examination of the Factors Shaping UK Supermarket Strategies on Climate Change," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(12), pages 2972-2990, December.
    4. Aimee Felstead & Kevin Thwaites & James Simpson, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework for Urban Commoning in Shared Residential Landscapes in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Cristina Mateos-Mora & María Rosa Herrera-Gutiérrez & Cristina González-Benítez, 2021. "The Impacts of Area-Based Policies on Essential Retail in Vulnerable Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Grimmer, Louise, 2021. "Drivers and barriers for city shopping: Perspectives from retailers and consumers in regional Australia," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    7. John Thompson & Martyn Benson & Peter McDonagh, 2015. "The social and economic impact of improving a town centre: The case of Rotherham," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(2), pages 231-248, March.
    8. Neil Wrigley & Daniel Warm & Barrie Margetts & Amanda Whelan, 2002. "Assessing the Impact of Improved Retail Access on Diet in a 'Food Desert': A Preliminary Report," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(11), pages 2061-2082, October.
    9. Yu Wu & Zhixiong Zhuo & Qunyue Liu & Kunyong Yu & Qitang Huang & Jian Liu, 2021. "The Relationships between Perceived Design Intensity, Preference, Restorativeness and Eye Movements in Designed Urban Green Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Patten, Dennis M. & Zhao, Na, 2014. "Standalone CSR reporting by U.S. retail companies," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 132-144.
    11. Ruochen Ma & Yuxin Luo & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Gender Differences and Optimizing Women’s Experiences: An Exploratory Study of Visual Behavior While Viewing Urban Park Landscapes in Tokyo, Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Cliff Guy & David Bennison, 2007. "Planning Guidance and Large-Store Development in the United Kingdom: The Search for ‘Flexibility’," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(4), pages 945-964, April.
    13. John Pal, 2008. "Working the System," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(4), pages 761-765, April.
    14. Yiwen Cui & Morten Gjerde & Bruno Marques, 2024. "Mapping and Assessing Effective Participatory Planning Processes for Urban Green Spaces in Aotearoa New Zealand’s Diverse Communities," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Zhi Yue & Ying Zhong & Zhouxiao Cui, 2022. "Respondent Dynamic Attention to Streetscape Composition in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Spinney, Jamie E.L. & Scott, Darren M. & Newbold, K. Bruce, 2009. "Transport mobility benefits and quality of life: A time-use perspective of elderly Canadians," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, January.
    17. Ian Clarke & Alan Hallsworth & Peter Jackson & Ronan de Kervenoael & Rossana Perez del Aguila & Malcolm Kirkup, 2006. "Retail Restructuring and Consumer Choice 1. Long-Term Local Changes in Consumer Behaviour: Portsmouth, 1980–2002," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(1), pages 25-46, January.
    18. Andrea L. Sparks & Neil Bania & Laura Leete, 2011. "Comparative Approaches to Measuring Food Access in Urban Areas," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(8), pages 1715-1737, June.
    19. Shaleen Singhal & Jim Berry & Stanley McGreal, 2009. "A Framework for Assessing Regeneration, Business Strategies and Urban Competitiveness," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 24(2), pages 111-124, March.
    20. Hermanus Geyer Jr, 2011. "The Retail City in Greater Birmingham – The changing face of urban retail districts as a result of retail-led regeneration and containment policy," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1358, European Regional Science Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4251-:d:255235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.