IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v49y2022i6p1775-1791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Street edge subdivision: Structuring ground floor interfaces to stimulate pedestrian visual engagement

Author

Listed:
  • James Simpson
  • Megan Freeth
  • Kimberley Jayne Simpson
  • Kevin Thwaites

Abstract

There have been numerous attempts to identify what makes the ground floor interfaces of street edges engaging for pedestrians. Their subdivision has often been highlighted as important, predominantly, in line with functions along their length. However, the effect of subdivision on street edge engagement is yet to be empirically tested. We use mobile eye-tracking to systematically examine where and for how long pedestrians visually engage ground floors in relation to their subdivision. We consider three scales of subdivision: morphologically defined plinths (different building ground floors), territorially defined segments (different areas of territorial ownership) and spatially defined micro-segments (different spaces separated by pillars and partitions). Results show that segments dominate ground floor visual engagement, with micro-segments also having a significant influence. Plinths were shown to have no direct effect upon such engagement. We subsequently use these findings to show how subdivision should be approached by design decision-makers when seeking to actively encourage pedestrian engagement with ground floors along street edges.

Suggested Citation

  • James Simpson & Megan Freeth & Kimberley Jayne Simpson & Kevin Thwaites, 2022. "Street edge subdivision: Structuring ground floor interfaces to stimulate pedestrian visual engagement," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1775-1791, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:6:p:1775-1791
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083211068050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083211068050
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083211068050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Halekoh, Ulrich & Højsgaard, Søren, 2014. "A Kenward-Roger Approximation and Parametric Bootstrap Methods for Tests in Linear Mixed Models The R Package pbkrtest," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 59(i09).
    2. James Simpson & Kevin Thwaites & Megan Freeth, 2019. "Understanding Visual Engagement with Urban Street Edges along Non-Pedestrianised and Pedestrianised Streets Using Mobile Eye-Tracking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Oh, Hyunjoo & Petrie, Jenny, 2012. "How do storefront window displays influence entering decisions of clothing stores?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 27-35.
    4. Kim Dovey & Stephen Wood, 2015. "Public/private urban interfaces: type, adaptation, assemblage," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Vikas Mehta & Binita Mahato, 2019. "Measuring the robustness of neighbourhood business districts," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 99-118, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nawaf Saeed Al Mushayt & Francesca Dal Cin & Sérgio Barreiros Proença, 2021. "New Lens to Reveal the Street Interface. A Morphological-Visual Perception Methodological Contribution for Decoding the Public/Private Edge of Arterial Streets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Paul E. Rose & James E. Brereton & Lewis J. Rowden & Ricardo Lemos Figueiredo & Lisa M. Riley, 2019. "What’s new from the zoo? An analysis of ten years of zoo-themed research output," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Pantano, Eleonora, 2016. "Engaging consumer through the storefront: Evidences from integrating interactive technologies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 149-154.
    4. Aimee Felstead & Kevin Thwaites & James Simpson, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework for Urban Commoning in Shared Residential Landscapes in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Byron C. Jaeger & Lloyd J. Edwards & Kalyan Das & Pranab K. Sen, 2017. "An statistic for fixed effects in the generalized linear mixed model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 1086-1105, April.
    6. King, K.W. & Hanrahan, B.R. & Stinner, J. & Shedekar, V.S., 2022. "Field scale discharge and water quality response, to drainage water management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    7. Mirna Zordan & Gianni Talamini & Caterina Villani, 2019. "The Association between Ground Floor Features and Public Open Space Face-To-Face Interactions: Evidence from Nantou Village, Shenzhen," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Peter H. Bloch & Omid Kamran-Disfani, 2018. "A framework for studying the impact of outdoor atmospherics in retailing," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 195-213, December.
    9. Govaerts, B. & Francq, B. & Marion, R. & Martin, M. & Thiel, M., 2020. "The essentials on linear regression, ANOVA, general linear and linear mixed models for the chemist," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2020012, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    10. Evgeniya Bobkova & Meta Berghauser Pont & Lars Marcus, 2021. "Towards analytical typologies of plot systems: Quantitative profile of five European cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 604-620, May.
    11. Lange, Fredrik & Rosengren, Sara & Blom, Angelica, 2016. "Store-window creativity's impact on shopper behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1014-1021.
    12. Kalantari, Saleh & Xu, Tong Bill & Govani, Viraj & Mostafavi, Armin, 2022. "Analyzing the effects of storefront window display transparency on perceived store Attractiveness and Approach behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    13. Dogerlioglu-Demir, Kivilcim & Akpinar, Ezgi & Gurhan-Canli, Zeynep & Koçaş, Cenk, 2022. "Are 1-endings the new 9-endings? An alternative for generating price discount perceptions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    14. Zhi Yue & Ying Zhong & Zhouxiao Cui, 2022. "Respondent Dynamic Attention to Streetscape Composition in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Yim, Mark Yi-Cheon & Lee, JeongGyu & Jeong, Haeyoung, 2021. "Exploring the impact of the physical conditions of mannequin displays on mental simulation: An embodied cognition theory perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    16. Lindström, Annika & Berg, Hanna & Nordfält, Jens & Roggeveen, Anne L. & Grewal, Dhruv, 2016. "Does the presence of a mannequin head change shopping behavior?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 517-524.
    17. García-Callejas, David & Araújo, Miguel B., 2016. "The effects of model and data complexity on predictions from species distributions models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 4-12.
    18. Moroni, Stefano & Minola, Luca, 2019. "Unnatural sprawl: Reconsidering public responsibility for suburban development in Italy, and the desirability and possibility of changing the rules of the game," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 104-112.
    19. Hesam Kamalipour & Nastaran Peimani, 2019. "Negotiating Space and Visibility: Forms of Informality in Public Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Blake B. Anderson & Andrew Scott & Reuven Dukas, 2016. "Social behavior and activity are decoupled in larval and adult fruit flies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(3), pages 820-828.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:6:p:1775-1791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.