IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i13p3587-d244148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Organizational Culture of a Major Social Work Institution in Romania: A Sociological Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Florina Luiza Vlaicu

    (The Department of Social Work, The West University of Timișoara, Timișoara 300223, Romania)

  • Alexandru Neagoe

    (The Department of Social Work, The West University of Timișoara, Timișoara 300223, Romania)

  • Laurențiu Gabriel Țîru

    (The Department of Sociology, The West University of Timișoara, Timișoara 300223, Romania)

  • Adrian Otovescu

    (The Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Science, The University of Craiova, Craiova 200585, Romania)

Abstract

This study aims to document the specific organizational culture existing in the General Directorate for Social Work and Child Protection (DGASPC) in the Gorj county, Romania. This is a major social work institution in Romania, but one which (like most other social work institutions in this country) have rarely been subject to the type of sociological research as the one reported in this article. The present analysis can help leaders in this organization and other similar organizations to assess and improve the cultural aspects that can influence the achievement of objectives, as well as the quality of the social services provided to service users. Our study has included 286 participants that hold various positions at DGASPC Gorj (social workers, psychologists, and educators). The chosen investigative instrument is the organizational culture assessment instrument (OCAI), a questionnaire designed to interpret organizational phenomena, developed by Cameron and Quinn and based on the conceptual framework of the “competing values framework”. The authors have identified four types of culture (clan, adhocracy, hierarchy, and market culture) and the tool allows an analysis of organizational culture based on the employees’ perception of the existing culture as well as also on their preferences regarding the way they would like to change the organizational culture in the future. The results show that the dominant culture is the hierarchy culture, closely followed by elements of clan culture. Other cultural dimensions are also explored and reported (leadership, success criteria, etc.).

Suggested Citation

  • Florina Luiza Vlaicu & Alexandru Neagoe & Laurențiu Gabriel Țîru & Adrian Otovescu, 2019. "The Organizational Culture of a Major Social Work Institution in Romania: A Sociological Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3587-:d:244148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3587/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3587/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antoniοs D. Kargas & Dimitrios Varoutas, 2015. "On the relation between organizational culture and leadership: An empirical analysis," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1055953-105, December.
    2. Oana-Bianca Bercea & Elena-Simina Lakatos & Laura Bacali, 2019. "Comparative Study Regarding Organizational Culture: Nonprofit Organization and Profit-Oriented Organization," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Sebastian A. Văduva & Randolph Wilt & Ioan Fotea & Lois P. Văduva (ed.), Civil Society: The Engine for Economic and Social Well-Being, chapter 0, pages 41-52, Springer.
    3. Brody Heritage & Clare Pollock & Lynne Roberts, 2014. "Validation of the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Verónica Sansabas-Villalpando & Iván Juan Carlos Pérez-Olguín & Luis Asunción Pérez-Domínguez & Luis Alberto Rodríguez-Picón & Luis Carlos Mendez-González, 2019. "CODAS HFLTS Method to Appraise Organizational Culture of Innovation and Complex Technological Changes Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Mangalane du Toit & Liezel Lues, 2021. "Transitioning to Sustainable Administrative Gatekeeping in Access to Social Grants for South African Adult Persons with Disabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rudolf Kampf & Silvia Lorincová & Miloš Hitka & Ondrej Stopka, 2017. "Generational Differences in the Perception of Corporate Culture in European Transport Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Antonios Kargas & Alexios Tsokos, 2020. "Employer Branding Implementation and Human Resource Management in Greek Telecommunication Industry," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Sapna Rijal, 2016. "The influence of transformational leadership and organizational culture on learning organization: A comparative analysis of the it sector," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 2(3), pages 121-130.
    4. Silvia Lorincova & Milos Hitka & Jozef Durian & Daniel Rauser, 2024. "Effectiveness factors of small and medium-sized enterprises from the perspective of corporate culture: A case study in Slovakia," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 27(1), pages 145-160, March.
    5. Li Xu & Suleiman Jamal Mohammad & Nishad Nawaz & Sarminah Samad & Naveed Ahmad & Ubaldo Comite, 2022. "The Role of CSR for De-Carbonization of Hospitality Sector through Employees: A Leadership Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Samuel Ogbeibu & Abdelhak Senadjki & Jude Emelifeonwu & Paramjeet Singh Vohra, 2020. "Inspiring Creativity in Diverse Organizational Cultures: An Expatriate Integrity Dilemma," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 28-41, March.
    7. Marie-Josée Fleury & Guy Grenier & Jean-Marie Bamvita & Lambert Farand, 2018. "Variables associated with job satisfaction among mental health professionals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Afiqah AMIN, 2022. "Analysis Of Organizational Culture In The Public Sector," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(4), pages 47-61, December.
    9. Limaj, Everist & Bernroider, Edward W.N., 2019. "The roles of absorptive capacity and cultural balance for exploratory and exploitative innovation in SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 137-153.
    10. Pooja Singh Negi & R. C. Dangwal, 2019. "Organisational Sustainability through Culture and Managerial Effectiveness: An Indian Perspective," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 5(1), pages 22-36, January.
    11. Ogbeibu, Samuel & Senadjki, Abdelhak & Gaskin, James, 2018. "The moderating effect of benevolence on the impact of organisational culture on employee creativity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 334-346.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3587-:d:244148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.