IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i10p2915-d233468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review of the Use of Agile Methodologies in Education to Foster Sustainability Competencies

Author

Listed:
  • Abigail López-Alcarria

    (Department of Research Methods in Education, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
    Current address: Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Alberto Olivares-Vicente

    (Independent Scholar, 18014 Granada, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Fátima Poza-Vilches

    (Department of Research Methods in Education, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
    Current address: Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain.)

Abstract

Life-long learning and Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in the current fast-evolving and ever-changing society requires modern pedagogical tools and methodologies that help the transmission of key competencies such as coping with uncertainty, adaptability, creativity, dialog, respect, self-confidence, emotional intelligence, responsibility and systemic thinking. The recent trend of the application of Agile methodologies for the management of projects in different fields can be a valuable tool to convey these competencies due to the participative, collaborative and constructionist principles in which they are deeply rooted. Some experiences of the application of Agile Methodologies in education—originating what is known as Agile Education—are, therefore, starting to appear in the literature. This work carries out a systematic review to analyze how this modern pedagogical tool is being used to foster key sustainable development competencies in the field of education. Results are presented for 11 out of 121 analyzed studies which present a direct link between key ESD competencies and Agile Education. It is shown that Agile Education creates a learning environment favorable for the creation of responsible and sustainable citizens while improving the performance, satisfaction and motivation of both faculty and students.

Suggested Citation

  • Abigail López-Alcarria & Alberto Olivares-Vicente & Fátima Poza-Vilches, 2019. "A Systematic Review of the Use of Agile Methodologies in Education to Foster Sustainability Competencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-29, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2915-:d:233468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2915/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2915/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham Room, 2011. "Complexity, Institutions and Public Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14394.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria José Sá & Sandro Serpa & Carlos Miguel Ferreira, 2022. "Citizen Science in the Promotion of Sustainability: The Importance of Smart Education for Smart Societies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Diego Galán-Casado & Alvaro Moraleda & María Luisa Martínez-Martí & Miguel Ángel Pérez-Nieto, 2020. "Sustainable Environments in Education: Results on the Effects of the New Environments in Learning Processes of University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Cecilia Smaniotto & Anna Saramin & Laura Brunelli & Maria Parpinel, 2022. "Insights and Next Challenges for the Italian Educational System to Teach Sustainability in a Global Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández & Juan José Maldonado-Briegas, 2019. "Sustainable Entrepreneurial Culture Programs Promoting Social Responsibility: A European Regional Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Tena Žužek & Žiga Gosar & Janez Kušar & Tomaž Berlec, 2020. "Adopting Agile Project Management Practices in Non-Software SMEs: A Case Study of a Slovenian Medium-Sized Manufacturing Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Katja Crnogaj & Polona Tominc & Maja Rožman, 2022. "A Conceptual Model of Developing an Agile Work Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. María Belén Calavia & Teresa Blanco & Roberto Casas & Belén Dieste, 2022. "Improving Design Project Management in Remote Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Maurisete Fernando Ferreira & Marcos Aurélio Vasconcelos Freitas & Neilton Fidelis da Silva & Antonia Francimar da Silva & Luciana Rocha Leal da Paz, 2020. "Insertion of Photovoltaic Solar Systems in Technological Education Institutions in Brazil: Teacher Perceptions Concerning Contributions towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Figen Akça, 2019. "Sustainable Development in Teacher Education in Terms of Being Solution Oriented and Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Linying Dong, 2023. "Strengthening Sustainability in Agile Education: Using Client-Sponsored Projects to Cultivate Agile Talents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Richard Glassey & Olle Bälter, 2021. "Sustainable Approaches for Accelerated Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, October.
    12. Taimour Khalid Claudhary & Stefan Trzcielinski, 2021. "Agile Enterprise and Opportunity Recognition in SMEs: A Concise Bibliometric Analysis," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 48-63.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bauer, Johannes M., 2014. "Platforms, systems competition, and innovation: Reassessing the foundations of communications policy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 662-673.
    2. Michal Shur‐Ofry & Ofer Malcai, 2021. "Collective action and social contagion: Community gardens as a case study," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 63-81, January.
    3. Bauer, Johannes M., 2018. "The Internet and income inequality: Socio-economic challenges in a hyperconnected society," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 333-343.
    4. Bale, Catherine S.E. & McCullen, Nicholas J. & Foxon, Timothy J. & Rucklidge, Alastair M. & Gale, William F., 2013. "Harnessing social networks for promoting adoption of energy technologies in the domestic sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 833-844.
    5. Pečarič Mirko, 2020. "Regulatory Cybernetics: Adaptability and Probability in the Public Administration’s Regulations," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 133-156, June.
    6. Elsner, Wolfram, 2015. "Policy Implications of Economic Complexity and Complexity Economics," MPRA Paper 63252, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Wolfram Elsner, 2019. "Policy and state in complexity economics," Chapters, in: Nikolaos Karagiannis & John E. King (ed.), A Modern Guide to State Intervention, chapter 1, pages 13-48, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Bloom, Gerald & Wolcott, Sara, 2013. "Building institutions for health and health systems in contexts of rapid change," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 216-222.
    9. Walton, Mat, 2014. "Applying complexity theory: A review to inform evaluation design," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 119-126.
    10. Abigail N. Devereaux, 2019. "The nudge wars: A modern socialist calculation debate," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 32(2), pages 139-158, June.
    11. Liz Johnson, 2015. "A call for complexity: integrated models to solve complex policy problems," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 14(2), pages 259-271, November.
    12. Bauer, Johannes M., 2022. "Toward new guardrails for the information society," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5).
    13. Kuhmonen, Tuomas, 2017. "Exposing the attractors of evolving complex adaptive systems by utilising futures images: Milestones of the food sustainability journey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 214-225.
    14. Kasianiuk, Krzysztof, 2016. "Towards a More Agile Public Policy Making," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 3(3), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Albert Breton, 2012. "Constitutional effectiveness," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 397-401, September.
    16. Robertson Munro, Fiona & Cairney, Paul, 2020. "A systematic review of energy systems: The role of policymaking in sustainable transitions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Cairney, Paul & McHarg, Aileen & McEwen, Nicola & Turner, Karen, 2019. "How to conceptualise energy law and policy for an interdisciplinary audience: The case of post-Brexit UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 459-466.
    18. Anzoise, Valentina & Sardo, Stefania, 2016. "Dynamic systems and the role of evaluation: The case of the Green Communities project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 162-172.
    19. Abigail Devereaux, 2019. "The Augmented Commons: How Augmented Reality Aids Agile Self-Organization," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 34(Summer 20), pages 81-101.
    20. Peeters, Paul, 2012. "A clear path towards sustainable mass tourism? Rejoinder to the paper ‘Organic, incremental and induced paths to sustainable mass tourism convergence’ by David B. Weaver," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 1038-1041.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2915-:d:233468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.