IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9245-d441198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adopting Agile Project Management Practices in Non-Software SMEs: A Case Study of a Slovenian Medium-Sized Manufacturing Company

Author

Listed:
  • Tena Žužek

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 6, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Žiga Gosar

    (Elvez d.o.o., Ulica Antona Tomšiča 35, 1294 Višnja Gora, Slovenia
    Jozef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Janez Kušar

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 6, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Tomaž Berlec

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 6, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

In today’s highly dynamic and unpredictable project environment, companies need to be able to manage changes quickly and effectively, otherwise, the final product will not be current and will only go to waste. Traditional project management approaches that focus on planning are no longer efficient and companies are forced to adopt new ways of working. As a result, more flexible agile project management (APM) approaches have emerged over the last decades. Originally developed for the software industry, APM is now increasingly recognized and adopted also by other industry sectors. However, due to some discipline-specific differences, the adoption of APM by non-software companies is challenging and requires many adjustments and high financial input. While the larger organizations have sufficient resources to make such a transition, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) generally cannot afford to do so, and therefore need alternative strategies to increase their agility and stay competitive on the global market. In this paper, we present a case study of a Slovenian medium-sized manufacturing company that implemented only certain APM practices separately and not as part of a structured APM methodology, and still managed to achieve significant benefits: improved communication, faster detection of discrepancies, more effective problem-solving and greater flexibility. The results also suggest that APM practices, even when implemented separately, positively impact project success in terms of both efficiency and stakeholder satisfaction, and can thus help in establishing an economically, socially, and environmentally more sustainable workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Tena Žužek & Žiga Gosar & Janez Kušar & Tomaž Berlec, 2020. "Adopting Agile Project Management Practices in Non-Software SMEs: A Case Study of a Slovenian Medium-Sized Manufacturing Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9245-:d:441198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9245/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9245/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Leicht & Daniel Castro-Fresno & Joaquìn Dìaz & Christian Baier, 2020. "Multidimensional Construction Planning and Agile Organized Project Execution—The 5D-PROMPT Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Abigail López-Alcarria & Alberto Olivares-Vicente & Fátima Poza-Vilches, 2019. "A Systematic Review of the Use of Agile Methodologies in Education to Foster Sustainability Competencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-29, May.
    3. Christoph Schmidt, 2016. "Agile Software Development," Progress in IS, in: Agile Software Development Teams, chapter 0, pages 7-35, Springer.
    4. Lea Hannola & Joel Friman & Jyri Niemimuukko, 2013. "Application of agile methods in the innovation process," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 84-98.
    5. Kasper Edwards & Robert G. Cooper & Tomas Vedsmand & Giulia Nardelli, 2019. "Evaluating the Agile-Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: Experiences From Three SME Manufacturing Firms," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(08), pages 1-32, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Orlando Lima & Gabriela Fernandes & Anabela Tereso, 2023. "Benefits of Adopting Innovation and Sustainability Practices in Project Management within the SME Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Victor Jiménez & Paulo Afonso & Gabriela Fernandes, 2020. "Using Agile Project Management in the Design and Implementation of Activity-Based Costing Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Tena Žužek & Žiga Gosar & Janez Kušar & Tomaž Berlec, 2021. "A New Product Development Model for SMEs: Introducing Agility to the Plan-Driven Concurrent Product Development Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Francisco José Gomes Silva & Konstantinos Kirytopoulos & Luis Pinto Ferreira & José Carlos Sá & Gilberto Santos & Maria Carolina Cancela Nogueira, 2022. "The three pillars of sustainability and agile project management: How do they influence each other," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1495-1512, September.
    5. Taimour Khalid Claudhary & Stefan Trzcielinski, 2021. "Agile Enterprise and Opportunity Recognition in SMEs: A Concise Bibliometric Analysis," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 48-63.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taimour Khalid Claudhary & Stefan Trzcielinski, 2021. "Agile Enterprise and Opportunity Recognition in SMEs: A Concise Bibliometric Analysis," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 48-63.
    2. Nina Tura & Lea Hannola & Mikko Pynnönen, 2017. "Agile Methods for Boosting the Commercialization Process of New Technology," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Tena Žužek & Žiga Gosar & Janez Kušar & Tomaž Berlec, 2021. "A New Product Development Model for SMEs: Introducing Agility to the Plan-Driven Concurrent Product Development Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Gupta, Manjul & George, Joey F. & Xia, Weidong, 2019. "Relationships between IT department culture and agile software development practices: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 13-24.
    5. Shivam Gupta & Vinayak A. Drave & Surajit Bag & Zongwei Luo, 2019. "Leveraging Smart Supply Chain and Information System Agility for Supply Chain Flexibility," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 547-564, June.
    6. Cecilia Smaniotto & Anna Saramin & Laura Brunelli & Maria Parpinel, 2022. "Insights and Next Challenges for the Italian Educational System to Teach Sustainability in a Global Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández & Juan José Maldonado-Briegas, 2019. "Sustainable Entrepreneurial Culture Programs Promoting Social Responsibility: A European Regional Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Sunkuk Kim, 2021. "Technology and Management for Sustainable Buildings and Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-3, August.
    9. Linying Dong, 2023. "Strengthening Sustainability in Agile Education: Using Client-Sponsored Projects to Cultivate Agile Talents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Pearson, R.J. & Costley, A.E. & Phaal, R. & Nuttall, W.J., 2020. "Technology Roadmapping for mission-led agile hardware development: a case study of a commercial fusion energy start-up," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Florin DUMITRIU & Gabriela MESNITA & Laura Diana RADU, 2019. "Challenges and Solutions of Applying Large-Scale Agile at Organization-al Level," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(3), pages 61-71.
    12. Berea Cristi, 2018. "Negotiation Analysis. The Context," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 284-288, July.
    13. Feldmann Anna, 2021. "The 5 P’s to success in intrapreneurial programs," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 71(1), pages 5-37, March.
    14. C. J. Torrecilla-Salinas & O. Troyer & M. J. Escalona & M. Mejías, 2019. "A Delphi-based expert judgment method applied to the validation of a mature Agile framework for Web development projects," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 9-40, March.
    15. Marinho, Marcelo & Amorim, Luís & Camara, Rafael & Oliveira, Brigitte Renata & Sobral, Marcos & Sampaio, Suzana, 2021. "Happier and further by going together: The importance of software team behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Paloma Lanza‐León & Lidia Sanchez‐Ruiz & David Cantarero‐Prieto, 2021. "Kanban system applications in healthcare services: A literature review," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 2062-2078, November.
    17. Čelesnik Goran & Radujković Mladen & Vrečko Igor, 2018. "Resolving Companies in Crisis: Agile Crisis Project Management," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 51(4), pages 223-237, December.
    18. Appiah, Gloria & Bonsu, Samuel K. & Sarpong, David, 2021. "The unpowered customer: Co-creation as tactics of the weak," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 317-326.
    19. Marco Brand & Victor Tiberius & Peter M. Bican & Alexander Brem, 2021. "Agility as an innovation driver: towards an agile front end of innovation framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 157-187, January.
    20. Damjan Vavpotič & Marko Robnik-Šikonja & Tomaž Hovelja, 2020. "Exploring the Relations Between Net Benefits of IT Projects and CIOs’ Perception of Quality of Software Development Disciplines," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(4), pages 347-360, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9245-:d:441198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.