IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i8p2860-d163296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Administrative Reform on Labour Market Transformations in Large Polish Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Przybyła

    (Department of Spatial Economy, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Marian Kachniarz

    (Department of Spatial Economy, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Maria Hełdak

    (Department of Spatial Economy, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

The purpose of the article was to discuss the impact of administrative reforms on the dynamics and the direction of changes occurring in the labour market structure of cities. In the existing research the view prevails that the loss of the voivodship capital function contributes strongly to the socio-economic degradation of the city. In Poland, this discussion has been caused by an administrative reform, as a result of which 49 existing voivodships and the related 49 voivodship capitals were replaced by 16 voivodships and 18 regional capitals. The carried out research focused on both these Polish urban centres which lost their voivodship status and the ones which retained it and become the centres of new, large regions. The Bray-Curtis measure was used to analyse the studied transformations. The data for 2005 and 2016 were used in the research. The conducted study allowed the identification of groups of the cities characterised by a similar range of changes in labour market structure. The research focused on answering the question whether retaining or losing the status of a voivodship city is related to the scale of these changes. The research results presented in the article seem to confirm that the role of administrative changes in the development of cities is not as extensive as it has commonly been attributed. The actual reasons for the economic growth of large centres, or the shrinking of some former voivodship cities, cannot be reduced to the effects of the reform itself. They result, to a much greater extent, from the processes of deindustrialisation, predominantly related to the regression of the declining industry sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Przybyła & Marian Kachniarz & Maria Hełdak, 2018. "The Impact of Administrative Reform on Labour Market Transformations in Large Polish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2860-:d:163296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2860/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2860/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglass C. North, 1955. "Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 63(3), pages 243-243.
    2. Maja Ročak & Gert-Jan Hospers & Nol Reverda, 2016. "Searching for Social Sustainability: The Case of the Shrinking City of Heerlen, The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Dascher, Kristof, 2000. "Are Politics and Geography Related? Evidence from a Cross-Section of Capital Cities," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 105(3-4), pages 373-392, December.
    4. Katarzyna Przybyła & Marian Kachniarz, 2017. "The Impact of Administrative Reform on the Central Functions of Larger Polish Cities," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3), pages 843-862, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beata Raszka & Halina Dzieżyc & Maria Hełdak, 2021. "Assessment of the Development Potential of Post-Industrial Areas in Terms of Social, Economic and Environmental Aspects: The Case of Wałbrzych Region (Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Elżbieta Sobczak & Bartosz Bartniczak & Andrzej Raszkowski, 2021. "Implementation of the No Poverty Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) in Visegrad Group (V4)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Agnieszka Stacherzak & Maria Hełdak, 2019. "Borough Development Dependent on Agricultural, Tourism, and Economy Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Andrzej Raszkowski & Bartosz Bartniczak, 2019. "Sustainable Development in the Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs): Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Olha Kravchenko & Anatolii Kucher & Maria Hełdak & Lesia Kucher & Joanna Wysmułek, 2020. "Socio-Economic Transformations in Ukraine towards the Sustainable Development of Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Bartosz Bartniczak & Andrzej Raszkowski, 2018. "Sustainable Development in African Countries: An Indicator-Based Approach and Recommendations for the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Andrzej Raszkowski & Bartosz Bartniczak, 2019. "On the Road to Sustainability: Implementation of the 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Przybyla, Katarzyna & Kachniarz, Marian & Ramsey, David, 2020. "The investment activity of cities in the context of their administrative status: A case study from Poland," MPRA Paper 100230, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Arun Natarajan Hariharan & Arindam Biswas, 2020. "A Critical review of the Indian knowledge‐based industry location policy against its theoretical arguments," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 431-454, June.
    3. Lego, Brian & Gebremedhin, Tesfa & Cushing, Brian, 2000. "A Multi-Sector Export Base Model of Long-Run Regional Employment Growth," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 192-197, October.
    4. Tomaz Dentinho & Vanda Serpa & Paulo Silveira & Joana Goncalves, 2006. "Land Use Change and Socio-Economic Evaluation in São Jorge Island (Between 15th and 20th Century)," ERSA conference papers ersa06p91, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Qiu, Bingwen & Li, Haiwen & Tang, Zhenghong & Chen, Chongcheng & Berry, Joe, 2020. "How cropland losses shaped by unbalanced urbanization process?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Zaborowski Tomasz, 2020. "Factors of Divergence between Peripheral and Central Subregions: The Case of Mazovia Province, Poland," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(4), pages 39-51, December.
    7. Antoine Grandclement & Guilhem Boulay, 2021. "From The Uneven De-Diversification Of Local Financial Resources To Planning Policies: The Residentialization Hypothesis," Post-Print halshs-03322259, HAL.
    8. A. I. Treivish, 2016. "Capital cities and state borders: Spatial relationships and shifts," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 244-257, July.
    9. JoseÌ Antonio de França & Wilfredo Sosa Sandoval, 2021. "Knowledge Economy in Brazil: Analysis of Sectoral Concentration and Production by Region," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(11), pages 1-53, November.
    10. Bieri, David, 2006. "Picking a Winner? Evidence from the Non-Manufacturing High-Tech Industry in the Blacksburg MSA," MPRA Paper 1079, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 06 Dec 2006.
    11. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2017. "A critical survey of the resource curse literature through the appropriability lens," CEPN Working Papers hal-01583559, HAL.
    12. Russo, Francesco & Musolino, Giuseppe, 2012. "A unifying modelling framework to simulate the Spatial Economic Transport Interaction process at urban and national scales," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 189-197.
    13. John B Parr, 2008. "Cities and Regions: Problems and Potentials," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(12), pages 3009-3026, December.
    14. Dustin L. Herrmann & William D. Shuster & Audrey L. Mayer & Ahjond S. Garmestani, 2016. "Sustainability for Shrinking Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-9, September.
    15. Sven Wardenburg & Thomas Brenner, 2021. "Analysing the spatio-temporal diffusion of economic change - advanced statistical approach and exemplary application," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2021-01, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    16. Gavin Bridge, 1999. "Harnessing the bonanza: economic liberalization and capacity building in the mineral sector," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 23(1), pages 43-55, February.
    17. Thomas R. Harris & J. Scott Shonkwiler & George E. Ebai, 1999. "Dynamic Nonmetropolitan Export-Base Modeling," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 29(2), pages 115-138, Fall.
    18. Banerjee, Swagata (Ban) & Harris, Thomas R., 2001. "A Disaggregated Time-Series Analysis Of Export-Base Models: A Case Study On Elko County Of Nevada," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20640, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Neil Lee & Stephen Clarke, 2017. "Who gains from high-tech growth? High-technology multipliers, employment and wages in Britain," SPRU Working Paper Series 2017-14, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    20. Sébastien Breau & David L. Rigby, 2006. "Is There Really an Export Wage Premium? A Case Study of Los Angeles Using Matched Employee-Employer Data," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 29(3), pages 297-310, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2860-:d:163296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.