IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i10p3689-d175669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes of Ecosystem Services and Landscape Patterns in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study in the Mentougou District in Beijing

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Yi

    (School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    Shanghai Urban Forest Ecosystem Research Station, State Forestry Administration, Shanghai 200240, China
    Beijing Engineering Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Mingchang Shi

    (Beijing Engineering Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Chunjiang Liu

    (School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    Shanghai Urban Forest Ecosystem Research Station, State Forestry Administration, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Bin Wang

    (Beijing Engineering Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Hongzhang Kang

    (School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    Shanghai Urban Forest Ecosystem Research Station, State Forestry Administration, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Xinli Hu

    (School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    Shanghai Urban Forest Ecosystem Research Station, State Forestry Administration, Shanghai 200240, China)

Abstract

Land use types have been strongly modified across mountainous areas. This has substantially altered the patterns and processes of ecosystems and the components of ecosystem services (ESs), and could in turn impact the sustainable development. In the mountainous Mentougou district of Beijing, we explored the changes in land use type (cropland, orchard, forested land, scrubland, grassland, bare land, water bodies, wasteland and built-up land), landscape patterns and ESs as well as their interactions during the past 30 years (1985–2014). The ESs included water yield (WY), carbon stocks (CS) and soil retention rate (SR). The results showed that 23.65% of the land use changed and the wasteland decreased by 80.87%. As for ESs, WY decreased by 47.32% since the year 2000, probably due to the increases in temperature and evapotranspiration. Although the decrease of forested land led to the decrease of CS, the increase of vegetation coverage improved SR. CS decreased by 0.99%from 1990 to 2014, and SR increased by 1.38% from 1985 to 2014. Landscape patterns became fragmented and dispersed, and MPS and CS, SHDI and SR were significantly negatively correlated. IJI and CS was positively correlated. This indicated that landscape patterns were highly correlated with ESs. In order to maintain the sustainable development of ESs, we should not only plan land use types, but also consider the rationality of landscape patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Yi & Mingchang Shi & Chunjiang Liu & Bin Wang & Hongzhang Kang & Xinli Hu, 2018. "Changes of Ecosystem Services and Landscape Patterns in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study in the Mentougou District in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3689-:d:175669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3689/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3689/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jayachandran, Seema & de Laat, Joost & Lambin, Eric F. & Stanton, Charlotte, 2016. "Cash for Carbon: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Payments for Ecosystem Services to Reduce Deforestation," CEPR Discussion Papers 11349, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Yang Yi & Yuanyuan Zhao & Guodong Ding & Guanglei Gao & Mingchang Shi & Yue Cao, 2016. "Effects of Urbanization on Landscape Patterns in a Mountainous Area: A Case Study in the Mentougou District, Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Díaz, Francisco J. & O′Geen, Anthony T. & Dahlgren, Randy A., 2012. "Agricultural pollutant removal by constructed wetlands: Implications for water management and design," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 171-183.
    4. Mônica Bahia Schlee & Kenneth R. Tamminga & Vera Regina Tangari, 2012. "A Method for Gauging Landscape Change as a Prelude to Urban Watershed Regeneration: The Case of the Carioca River, Rio de Janeiro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(9), pages 1-45, August.
    5. Chunhua Zhang & Weimin Ju & Jing Chen & Mei Zan & Dengqiu Li & Yanlian Zhou & Xiqun Wang, 2013. "China’s forest biomass carbon sink based on seven inventories from 1973 to 2008," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 933-948, June.
    6. John M. Antle & Jetse J. Stoorvogel, 2006. "Predicting the Supply of Ecosystem Services from Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(5), pages 1174-1180.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang Yi & Chen Zhang & Jinqi Zhu & Yugang Zhang & Hao Sun & Hongzhang Kang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution, Prediction and Optimization of LUCC Based on CA-Markov and InVEST Models: A Case Study of Mentougou District, Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Yi & Chen Zhang & Jinqi Zhu & Yugang Zhang & Hao Sun & Hongzhang Kang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution, Prediction and Optimization of LUCC Based on CA-Markov and InVEST Models: A Case Study of Mentougou District, Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Antoine Leblois, 2021. "Mitigating the impact of bad rainy seasons in poor agricultural regions to tackle deforestation," Post-Print hal-03111007, HAL.
    3. Jean-Marc Blazy & Julie Subervie & Jacky Paul & François Causeret & Loic Guinde & Sarah Moulla & Alban Thomas & Jorge Sierra, 2020. "Ex ante assessment of the cost-effectiveness of Agri-Environmental Schemes promoting compost use to sequester carbon in soils in Guadeloupe," CEE-M Working Papers hal-02748634, CEE-M, Universtiy of Montpellier, CNRS, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro.
    4. Pedro Garcia-Caparros & Juana Isabel Contreras & Rafael Baeza & Maria Luz Segura & Maria Teresa Lao, 2017. "Integral Management of Irrigation Water in Intensive Horticultural Systems of Almería," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Wollni, M. & Lanza, G. & Ibanez, M., 2018. "Social capital and conservation under collective and individual incentive schemes: a framed field experiment in Indonesia," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275968, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Valdivia, Roberto O. & Antle, John M. & Stoorvogel, Jetse J., 2012. "Coupling the Tradeoff Analysis Model with a market equilibrium model to analyze economic and environmental outcomes of agricultural production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 17-29.
    7. Bryan, Gharad & Chowdhury, Shyamal & Mobarak, Ahmed Mushfiq & Morten, Melanie & Smits, Joeri, 2021. "Encouragement and Distortionary Effects of Conditional Cash Transfers," IZA Discussion Papers 14326, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Muhammad Zada & Syed Jamal Shah & Cao Yukun & Tariq Rauf & Naveed Khan & Syed Asad Ali Shah, 2019. "Impact of Small-to-Medium Size Forest Enterprises on Rural Livelihood: Evidence from Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Solomon Hsiang & Paulina Oliva & Reed Walker, 2019. "The Distribution of Environmental Damages," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 13(1), pages 83-103.
    10. Paolo Vassallo & Claudia Turcato & Ilaria Rigo & Claudia Scopesi & Andrea Costa & Matteo Barcella & Giulia Dapueto & Mauro Mariotti & Chiara Paoli, 2021. "Biophysical Accounting of Forests’ Value under Different Management Regimes: Conservation vs. Exploitation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Bocci, Corinne F. & Lupi, Frank & Sohngen, Brent, 2018. "Timber or Carbon? Evaluating forest conservation strategies through a discrete choice experiment conducted in northern Guatemala," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274011, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Li Dai & Yufang Zhang & Lei Wang & Shuanli Zheng & Wenqiang Xu, 2021. "Assessment of Carbon Density in Natural Mountain Forest Ecosystems at Northwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, February.
    13. Richards, Ryan C. & Kennedy, Chris J. & Lovejoy, Thomas E. & Brancalion, Pedro H.S., 2017. "Considering farmer land use decisions in efforts to ‘scale up’ Payments for Watershed Services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 238-247.
    14. Araujo, Rafael & Costa, Francisco J M & Sant'Anna, Marcelo, 2020. "Efficient Forestation in the Brazilian Amazon: Evidence from a Dynamic Model," SocArXiv 8yfr7, Center for Open Science.
    15. Faraz Usmani & Marc Jeuland & Subhrendu K. Pattanayak, 2018. "NGOs and the effectiveness of interventions," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-59, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    16. Grillos, Tara & Bottazzi, Patrick & Crespo, David & Asquith, Nigel & Jones, Julia P.G., 2019. "In-kind conservation payments crowd in environmental values and increase support for government intervention: A randomized trial in Bolivia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Birte Snilsveit & Jennifer Stevenson & Laurenz Langer & Natalie Tannous & Zafeer Ravat & Promise Nduku & Joshua Polanin & Ian Shemilt & John Eyers & Paul J. Ferraro, 2019. "Incentives for climate mitigation in the land use sector—the effects of payment for environmental services on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A mixed‐meth," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), September.
    18. Vassiliki Vlami & Stamatis Zogaris & Hakan Djuma & Ioannis P. Kokkoris & George Kehayias & Panayotis Dimopoulos, 2019. "A Field Method for Landscape Conservation Surveying: The Landscape Assessment Protocol (LAP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Luc Behaghel & Karen Macours & Julie Subervie, 2019. "How can randomised controlled trials help improve the design of the common agricultural policy?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 46(3), pages 473-493.
    20. Chabé-Ferret, Sylvain & Voia, Anca, 2019. "Are Grassland Conservation Programs a Cost-Effective Way to Fight Climate Change? Evidence from France," SocArXiv cx8j6, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3689-:d:175669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.