IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i6p161-d1676167.html

Scientific Production on Physical Activity, Physical Education, Global Warming and Climate Change: A Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Castillo-Paredes

    (Grupo AFySE, Investigación en Actividad Física y Salud Escolar, Escuela de Pedagogía en Educación Física, Facultad de Educación, Universidad de Las Américas, Santiago 8370040, Chile)

  • Angel Denche-Zamorano

    (Promoting a Healthy Society Research Group (PHeSO), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain)

  • Mario Fuentes-Rubio

    (Departamento de Educación Física, Deportes y Recreación, Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educación, Santiago 7780450, Chile)

  • Matias Portela-Estinto

    (Departamento de Promoción de la Salud y Participación Ciudadana, Ministerio de Salud, Santiago 8320076, Chile)

  • José Carmelo Adsuar

    (Promoting a Healthy Society Research Group (PHeSO), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
    CIPER, Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Diana Salas-Gómez

    (Departamento de Desporto e Saúde, Escola de Saúde e Desenvolvimento Humano, Universidade de Évora, 7004-516 Évora, Portugal)

Abstract

Physical activity allows people to obtain multidimensional benefits. Regular practice and following the recommendations can provide the benefits mentioned above. However, it has been evidenced that the variability in the environmental temperature is a determining factor to adhere to the regular practice of physical activity. From this point of view, it has become evident that researchers have joined criteria to explore the effects of climate change or global warming on physical activity or physical education. This study is the first bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature related to physical activity, physical education, global warming, and climate change. The objective of the present bibliometric review was to examine annual publication trends, identifying the categories, journals, and countries with the highest number of publications on this topic. In addition, the secondary objective was to identify the most productive and prominent authors, highlight the most cited articles, and determine the keywords most used by the authors. We analyzed 261 papers published in journals indexed in the Web of Science, examining the trend followed by annual publications, identifying prolific and prominent co-authors, leading countries and journals, most cited papers, and most used author keywords. The annual publications followed an exponential growth trend (R 2 = 90%), which means that there is great interest in the scientific community for this object of study. The Journal of Physical Activity & Health was the journal with the most published papers. M.S. Tremblay and E.Y. Lee were the most prominent co-authors, and as reference authors on the subject, M. Nieuwenhuijsen and H. Khreis were the most prominent authors. The three countries with the highest productivity are the USA, the UK, and Canada. Although a total of 29 keywords were identified, only 25 of them were commonly recurrent, with the most used being climate change and physical activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Castillo-Paredes & Angel Denche-Zamorano & Mario Fuentes-Rubio & Matias Portela-Estinto & José Carmelo Adsuar & Diana Salas-Gómez, 2025. "Scientific Production on Physical Activity, Physical Education, Global Warming and Climate Change: A Bibliometric Analysis," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:161-:d:1676167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/6/161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/6/161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachele Pojednic & Emma D'Arpino & Ian Halliday & Amy Bantham, 2022. "The Benefits of Physical Activity for People with Obesity, Independent of Weight Loss: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Higgins, Paul A. T. & Higgins, Millicent, 2005. "A healthy reduction in oil consumption and carbon emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 1-4, January.
    3. Li Yan & Wang Zhiping, 2023. "Mapping the Literature on Academic Publishing: A Bibliometric Analysis on WOS," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    4. Carly Ray & Xue Ming, 2020. "Climate Change and Human Health: A Review of Allergies, Autoimmunity and the Microbiome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-7, July.
    5. J. E. Hirsch, 2010. "An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(3), pages 741-754, December.
    6. Philip M. Morse & Ferdinand F. Leimkuhler, 1979. "Technical Note—Exact Solution for the Bradford Distribution and Its Use in Modeling Informational Data," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 187-198, February.
    7. María Mendoza-Muñoz & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Jorge Carlos-Vivas & Ángel Denche-Zamorano & José Camelo Adsuar & Armando Raimundo & Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda & Nicolás Contreras-Barraza & Nicolás Muñoz-Ur, 2022. "The Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Physical Literacy for a Healthy Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Catherine B. Chan & Daniel A. Ryan, 2009. "Assessing the Effects of Weather Conditions on Physical Activity Participation Using Objective Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Higgins, Paul A.T. & Higgins, Millicent, 2005. "Corrigendum to "A healthy reduction in oil consumption and carbon emissions?" [Energy Policy 33 (2005) 1-4]," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 425-425, February.
    10. Antonio Castillo-Paredes & Natalia Inostroza Jiménez & Maribel Parra-Saldías & Ximena Palma-Leal & José Luis Felipe & Itziar Págola Aldazabal & Ximena Díaz-Martínez & Fernando Rodríguez-Rodríguez, 2021. "Environmental and Psychosocial Barriers Affect the Active Commuting to University in Chilean Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Werner Marx, 2016. "Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1477-1495, December.
    12. James Dollman, 2018. "Social and Environmental Influences on Physical Activity Behaviours," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-3, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mrkajic, Vladimir & Vukelic, Djordje & Mihajlov, Andjelka, 2015. "Reduction of CO2 emission and non-environmental co-benefits of bicycle infrastructure provision: the case of the University of Novi Sad, Serbia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 232-242.
    2. Bram Boettge & Damon M. Hall & Thomas Crawford, 2017. "Assessing the Bicycle Network in St. Louis: A PlaceBased User-Centered Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Antonio Fernandez-Cano & Inés M. Fernández-Guerrero, 2017. "A multivariate model for evaluating emergency medicine journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 991-1003, February.
    4. Yingjin Song & Ruiyi Li & Guanyi Chen & Beibei Yan & Lei Zhong & Yuxin Wang & Yihang Li & Jinlei Li & Yingxiu Zhang, 2021. "Bibliometric Analysis of Current Status on Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils during 2000–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Deming Lin & Tianhui Gong & Wenbin Liu & Martin Meyer, 2020. "An entropy-based measure for the evolution of h index research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2283-2298, December.
    6. Ben Zhang & Xiaohong Wang, 2017. "Empirical study on influence of university-industry collaboration on research performance and moderating effect of social capital: evidence from engineering academics in China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 257-277, October.
    7. Daniela Filippo & Pablo Sastrón-Toledo, 2023. "Influence of research on open science in the public policy sphere," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1995-2017, March.
    8. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Ho, Mei Hsiu-Ching, 2012. "Total influence and mainstream measures for scientific researchers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 496-504.
    9. Gao, Qiang & Liang, Zhentao & Wang, Ping & Hou, Jingrui & Chen, Xiuxiu & Liu, Manman, 2021. "Potential index: Revealing the future impact of research topics based on current knowledge networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    10. Ash Mohammad Abbas, 2011. "Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(1), pages 107-131, July.
    11. Eszter Füzéki & Jan Schröder & Nicolò Carraro & Laura Merlo & Rüdiger Reer & David A. Groneberg & Winfried Banzer, 2021. "Physical Activity during the First COVID-19-Related Lockdown in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-11, March.
    12. Abdelkebir Sahid & Yassine Maleh & Karim Ouazzane, 2025. "Changing landscape of fake news research on social media: a bibliometric analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 901-954, April.
    13. Jiang Wu, 2013. "Geographical knowledge diffusion and spatial diversity citation rank," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(1), pages 181-201, January.
    14. Wu, Jiang, 2013. "Investigating the universal distributions of normalized indicators and developing field-independent index," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 63-71.
    15. Daniele Checchi & Alberto Ciolfi & Gianni De Fraja & Irene Mazzotta & Stefano Verzillo, 2021. "Have you Read This? An Empirical Comparison of the British REF Peer Review and the Italian VQR Bibliometric Algorithm," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 88(352), pages 1107-1129, October.
    16. Ransome Epie Bawack & Samuel Fosso Wamba & Kevin Daniel André Carillo & Shahriar Akter, 2022. "Artificial intelligence in E-Commerce: a bibliometric study and literature review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 297-338, March.
    17. Yang, Chao & Huang, Cui, 2022. "Quantitative mapping of the evolution of AI policy distribution, targets and focuses over three decades in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Bornmann, Lutz & Haunschild, Robin, 2018. "Normalization of zero-inflated data: An empirical analysis of a new indicator family and its use with altmetrics data," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 998-1011.
    19. Jun Ma & Jianpeng Zhang & Jinliang Wang & Vadim Khromykh & Jie Li & Xuzheng Zhong, 2023. "Global Leaf Area Index Research over the Past 75 Years: A Comprehensive Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    20. Xiaozan Lyu & Rodrigo Costas, 2020. "How do academic topics shift across altmetric sources? A case study of the research area of Big Data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(2), pages 909-943, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:161-:d:1676167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.