IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i16p8859-d619701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bibliometric Analysis of Current Status on Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils during 2000–2019

Author

Listed:
  • Yingjin Song

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Ruiyi Li

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Guanyi Chen

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)

  • Beibei Yan

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Lei Zhong

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Yuxin Wang

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Yihang Li

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Jinlei Li

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Yingxiu Zhang

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    China-Australia Centre for Sustainable Urban Development, Tianjin 300350, China)

Abstract

Petroleum contaminated soils have become a great concern worldwide. Bioremediation has been widely recognized as one of the most promising technologies and has played an important role in solving the issues of petroleum contaminated soils. In this study, a bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer based on Web of Science data was conducted to provide an overview on the field of bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soils. A total of 7575 articles were analyzed on various aspects of the publication characteristics, such as publication output, countries, institutions, journals, highly cited papers, and keywords. An evaluating indicator, h -index, was applied to characterize the publications. The pace of publishing in this field increased steadily over last 20 years. China accounted for the most publications (1476), followed by the United States (1032). The United States had the highest h -index (86) and also played a central role in the collaboration network among the most productive countries. The Chinese Academy of Sciences was the institution with the largest number of papers (347) and cooperative relations (52). Chemosphere was the most productive journal (360). Our findings indicate that the influence of developing countries has increased over the years, and researchers tend to publish articles in high-quality journals. At present, mainstream research is centered on biostimulation, bioaugmentation, and biosurfactant application. Combined pollution of petroleum hydrocarbons and heavy metals, microbial diversity monitoring, biosurfactant application, and biological combined remediation technology are considered future research hotspots.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingjin Song & Ruiyi Li & Guanyi Chen & Beibei Yan & Lei Zhong & Yuxin Wang & Yihang Li & Jinlei Li & Yingxiu Zhang, 2021. "Bibliometric Analysis of Current Status on Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils during 2000–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8859-:d:619701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8859/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8859/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. E. Hirsch, 2010. "An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(3), pages 741-754, December.
    2. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    3. Arezoo Dadrasnia & Salmah Ismail, 2015. "Biosurfactant Production by Bacillus salmalaya for Lubricating Oil Solubilization and Biodegradation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Chen, Lujie & Zhao, Xiande & Tang, Ou & Price, Lydia & Zhang, Shanshan & Zhu, Wenwen, 2017. "Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 73-87.
    5. Kun-Yang Chuang & Ya-Li Huang & Yuh-Shan Ho, 2007. "A bibliometric and citation analysis of stroke-related research in Taiwan," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 72(2), pages 201-212, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jadwiga Wyszkowska & Agata Borowik & Magdalena Zaborowska & Jan Kucharski, 2023. "Biochar, Halloysite, and Alginite Improve the Quality of Soil Contaminated with Petroleum Products," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Suzanne C. Henderson & Amalesh Dhar & M. Anne Naeth, 2023. "Reclamation of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils Using Soil Amendments and Native Plant Species," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiancheng Guan & Yan Yan & Jingjing Zhang, 2015. "How do collaborative features affect scientific output? Evidences from wind power field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 333-355, January.
    2. Alireza Mesdaghinia & Masoud Younesian & Simin Nasseri & Ramin Nabizadeh Nodehi & Mahdi Hadi, 2015. "Analysis of the microbial risk assessment studies from 1973 to 2015: a bibliometric case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 691-707, October.
    3. Luis Javier Cabeza-Ramírez & Fernando J. Fuentes-García & Guzmán A. Muñoz-Fernandez, 2021. "Exploring the Emerging Domain of Research on Video Game Live Streaming in Web of Science: State of the Art, Changes and Trends," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-27, March.
    4. Kristina Galjanić & Ivan Marović & Nikša Jajac, 2022. "Decision Support Systems for Managing Construction Projects: A Scientific Evolution Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Amanda Augusta Fernandes & Cristina Adams & Luciana Gomes de Araujo & João Paulo Romanelli & João Paulo Bispo Santos & Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues, 2022. "Forest Landscape Restoration and Local Stakeholders: A Global Bibliometric Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Youssef Elomari & Masoud Norouzi & Marc Marín-Genescà & Alberto Fernández & Dieter Boer, 2022. "Integration of Solar Photovoltaic Systems into Power Networks: A Scientific Evolution Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Abeer Elshater & Hisham Abusaada, 2022. "Developing Process for Selecting Research Techniques in Urban Planning and Urban Design with a PRISMA-Compliant Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Jacob Wood & Gohar Feroz Khan, 2015. "International trade negotiation analysis: network and semantic knowledge infrastructure," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 537-556, October.
    9. Antonio Fernandez-Cano & Inés M. Fernández-Guerrero, 2017. "A multivariate model for evaluating emergency medicine journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 991-1003, February.
    10. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    11. Niccolò Comerio & Fernanda Strozzi, 2019. "Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(1), pages 109-131, February.
    12. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    13. Deming Lin & Tianhui Gong & Wenbin Liu & Martin Meyer, 2020. "An entropy-based measure for the evolution of h index research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2283-2298, December.
    14. Maria Lourdes Ordoñez Olivo & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Shaping the Knowledge Base of Bioeconomy Sectors Development in Latin American and Caribbean Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Akinpelu, O.A. & Olaleye, O. & Fagbola, O., 2023. "The Soil Organic Matter Decomposers: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 9(4), August.
    16. Urša Golob & Mark A. P. Davies & Joachim Kernstock & Shaun M. Powell, 2020. "Trending topics plus future challenges and opportunities in brand management," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 123-129, March.
    17. Natalya Ivanova & Ekaterina Zolotova, 2023. "Landolt Indicator Values in Modern Research: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    18. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    19. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    20. J. Gómez-Verjan & I. Gonzalez-Sanchez & E. Estrella-Parra & R. Reyes-Chilpa, 2015. "Trends in the chemical and pharmacological research on the tropical trees Calophyllum brasiliense and Calophyllum inophyllum, a global context," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1019-1030, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8859-:d:619701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.